Subforums
17,085 topics in this forum
-
- 518 replies
- 163.3k views
-
- 20 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.4m views
-
- 1 reply
- 10.2k views
-
- 156 replies
- 6.1k views
-
Anyone with a Panasonic S5 II or S9 interested in testing my in-cam ARRI compatible LOG C3 profile? 1 2
- 28 replies
- 5.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 76 views
-
- 21 replies
- 562 views
-
- 56 replies
- 4.1k views
-
- 23 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 5 replies
- 425 views
-
- 5 replies
- 317 views
-
- 13 replies
- 484 views
-
- 0 replies
- 229 views
-
- 70 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 29 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 35 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 14 replies
- 773 views
-
- 36 replies
- 11.4k views
-
- 228 replies
- 84k views
-
- 9 replies
- 623 views
-
- 118 replies
- 22.9k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 25 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.9k views
-
Grant Petty on the future of DaVinci Resolve Studio pricing: "We'll probably eventually charge some kind of upgrade for this." 1 2
- 22 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 757 replies
- 165.9k views
-
- 3 replies
- 633 views
-
- 7 replies
- 543 views
-
- 36 replies
- 6.8k views
-
- 8 replies
- 759 views
-
- 0 replies
- 450 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 23 replies
- 5.3k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 832 views
-
- 14 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 163 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 56 replies
- 8.5k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.3k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.1k
-
Total Posts347.5k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Not interested! All of these current and recent models can do everything I need them to do and my only interest now is how compact a total kit I can make and do so at the lowest possible cost without sacrificing anything. -
An FX3II or something is expected in the next few weeks so Pana will be again one step behind. -
Here is the summary: give Panasonic engineers a random sensor, and they give you the most video featured camera around that sensor that you could imagine. The problem is 1. Nobody gives them the state of the art sensor (or they don't like to pay high price) 2. They're asked to repeat themselves for similar sensor/bodies with overlapping customer target. 3. What they do is attractive for niche part of the hybrid market and not enough to absorb new customers. 4. "Similar offering to big three but at cheaper price" could kick the can down the road for a while, but even that strategy is no more with these prices. 5. When a market is saturated, and there are big players in that saturated market, the only way to survive is to be bold and different. Just like what Chinese discovered in the lens market, and so we're seeing 15mm macro! -
I will wait too. The S1ii extra DR sounds nice, but not at the expence of overly sharp details with too much baked in NR. If the PRRaw is the only option to get rid of this with S1ii, Z6iii and N-Raw is the better option, as it works with Resolve and file sizes are less than half of PRRaw. After Z6iii got the latest 1.10 firmware update, there’s not much to complain about the Z6iii IQ in shadows, no need to use NR any more, unless you need to lift shadows over 1 or 2 stops. Could be the 135mm 1.8 Plena is doing it’s magic too in low light. After 2.5 months shooting only N-Raw with normal quality I’ve got 1.5TB of footage. With PRRaw that would be over 3TB, and with H.265 only around 300GB🤪 -
By newfoundmass · Posted
I don't think Lumix gets nearly the credit they deserve for everything they throw into these cameras. You could argue that they almost put too much in. The codecs, frame rates, and aspect ratio options could be considered overwhelming by some folks.
-
