Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,342 visits to this link)
17,188 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 74 views
-
- 700 replies
- 272.6k views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.4m views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.7m views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 680.3k views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 399k views
-
- 2 replies
- 28 views
-
- 22 replies
- 569 views
-
- 1 reply
- 114 views
-
- 0 replies
- 116 views
-
- 0 replies
- 133 views
-
- 28 replies
- 996 views
-
- 458 replies
- 103.2k views
-
- 32 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 12 replies
- 582 views
-
- 102 replies
- 51.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 150 views
-
- 19 replies
- 7.2k views
-
- 13 replies
- 267 views
-
- 4 replies
- 355 views
-
- 3 replies
- 269 views
-
- 5 replies
- 737 views
-
- 1 reply
- 519 views
-
- 19 replies
- 570 views
-
- 3 replies
- 614 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 25 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 32 replies
- 11.8k views
-
- 9 replies
- 876 views
-
- 11 replies
- 941 views
-
- 32 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 399 views
-
- 1 reply
- 425 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 540 replies
- 242.2k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 404 views
-
- 31 replies
- 31.4k views
-
- 136 replies
- 34.2k views
-
- 243 replies
- 132.4k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts350.3k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By newfoundmass · Posted
They are outdated in that they are older cameras that don't have all the bells and whistles of the most modern camera released but in terms of image quality, I think every single one still holds up. I'd very much miss the lack of IBIS and shutter degree, but I could absolutely do my work with three GH3 bodies if I had to and I don't think most people would notice or care. The cons were low light and auto focus (though I still think the GH5's auto focus was usable in real situations despite others proclaiming it to be unusable.) You also needed to hack the GH2 to get the most out of it, so that could be seen as a con for it. The pros? Great IBIS in the cameras that have it (the GH5's IBIS still blows away IBIS in Sony's newest cameras), the battery life was incredible (at least up to the GH5; haven't used the GH6 or 7), no overheating, excellent image quality, decent audio preamps (GH3 on, from my experience), plus you get all the benefits of usinga M43 camera, like the smaller lenses and the ability to adapt anything. -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
There isn't a single camera in the entire GH line that wouldn't be usable today. If you want 4K, you'd need to go GH4 or newer. If you want reliable video autofocus, the only option is the GH7. For the best low-light performance, the GH5s is probably your best bet (though I'm not sure if the GH6 or GH7 have great low light performance). The older models struggled more in low light. With the GH1 and GH2, hacking them for more bitrate is suggested for best quality. The most popular models were the GH2 and GH5, but the GH7 seems also to be well-regarded. -
-
By Andrew Reid · Posted
Anyway I'm going to lock the thread, it's been completely wreaked as usual and it would be better to go back to cameras. -
By Andrew Reid · Posted
I think praising someone that dangerous, with that kind of low moral standing, for being a good at executing a business plan is missing the point, but then each to their own. His PayPal chum is even worse. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/10/peter-thiel-lectures-antichrist
-
