Jump to content

17,171 topics in this forum

    • 540 replies
    • 238.9k views
    • 31 replies
    • 29.1k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 1.7m views
    • 2 replies
    • 19k views
    • 17 replies
    • 262 views
  2. How Many Cameras?

    • 8 replies
    • 427 views
    • 19 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 16 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 1 reply
    • 64 views
    • 5 replies
    • 518 views
    • 440 replies
    • 98.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 82 views
    • 136 replies
    • 32.4k views
  3. How to mount Isco

    • 1 reply
    • 197 views
    • 243 replies
    • 131.5k views
    • 695 replies
    • 267.8k views
    • 11 replies
    • 985 views
    • 6 replies
    • 509 views
    • 6 replies
    • 625 views
    • 15 replies
    • 893 views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.5k views
  4. The D-Mount project 1 2 3 4

    • 61 replies
    • 30.4k views
    • 64 replies
    • 31.4k views
    • 14 replies
    • 9.1k views
    • 5 replies
    • 419 views
    • 9 replies
    • 983 views
    • 22 replies
    • 2.9k views
    • 29 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 111 replies
    • 49.6k views
    • 13 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 7 replies
    • 937 views
  5. new camera purchase 1 2 3 4 5

    • 91 replies
    • 69.6k views
    • 9 replies
    • 781 views
    • 0 replies
    • 418 views
    • 92 replies
    • 34.2k views
    • 5 replies
    • 2k views
    • 48 replies
    • 24.1k views
    • 25 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 10 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 8 replies
    • 1.2k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.2k
    • Total Posts
      350.2k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,314
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    KnutL
    Joined
  • Posts

    • It wouldn't shock me. Those cheap Chinese brands like Viltrox that are putting out very good quality AF lenses for a fraction of what Sony sells their lenses for have to be hurting. When the E-mount was new and competing against DSLR and even M43, it needed all the help it could to expand how many lenses it had. Now, not so much. The L-Mount Alliance makes more sense for Leica, Lumix, and Sigma now, because while the alliance has grown to include some of those Chinese companies that have flooded e-mount, there hasn't been that free for all for L-Mount, presumably because of the agreements? 
    • Apparently, the A7V AF is struggling with 3rd party lenses.  When Sony was asked about the issue, their response as “We do no guarantee compatibility”.  Maybe Sony has dumbed down the AF for the 3rd party lenses.  Something to watch.      
    • How is Sony's IBIS still so bad? How is it still missing features that the S5II X had 2 1/2 years ago? Even Canon has caught up.  I get it's a hybrid, but this is stuff that social media professionals need/use.
    • It's not going to be groundbreaking as the standard model, leave that for the a1 II and a9 III which are indeed ground-breaking, especially that world first on a full frame global shutter sensor in a mirrorless camera. The big appeal of the a7 V for me is: Only E-mount and Z has the wonderful Techart Leica M autofocus adapter, which means ALL of my best lenses can now be used with back-button AF for stills. When I go back to a Panasonic or L-mount camera, I have to focus it all manually, such a drag after you have experienced the other way. Then there is the GFX 100, which is now my main system. You are happy to put vintage full frame glass on it, because it changes the look in a very nice way. It makes a full frame camera look like a crop. Darker, softer corners are the trade off - usually, I don't mind it. So if I am to pick up a full frame camera it has to compliment the GFX 100, do things that can't - like the Techart adapter, an eco-system with the most adapters, the outright best mount, great AF, great ergonomics and colour (Sony have improved a lot in these areas), and Sony has a lead in terms of their outright best full frame cameras. Which means, should the a7 V borrow from the a1 II, it ends up rather good - which it is. Whereas, Panasonic's latest $3k cameras tend to borrow from the S5 II, rather than a higher-end $6k Panasonic, which doesn't exist (yet) and no S1H II either. So Sony is attractive for a lot of shooters... And over Canon RF mount, E mount takes the win by far in terms of the available glass, adapters and pricing thereof.
×
×
  • Create New...