Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (24,058 visits to this link)
17,326 topics in this forum
-
- 5.8k replies
- 2m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 520.5k views
-
- 706 replies
- 338.3k views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.9m views
-
- 0 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 806.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 9 views
-
- 10 replies
- 447 views
-
- 44 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 322 replies
- 161.4k views
-
- 14 replies
- 603 views
-
- 17 replies
- 3k views
-
- 546 replies
- 244.9k views
-
- 521 replies
- 177.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 161 views
-
- 6 replies
- 367 views
-
- 29 replies
- 50.8k views
-
- 57 replies
- 9.4k views
-
- 7 replies
- 613 views
-
- 22 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 74 replies
- 13.2k views
-
- 5 replies
- 418 views
-
- 11 replies
- 808 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 241 views
-
- 3 replies
- 961 views
-
- 18 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 32 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 315 replies
- 151.5k views
-
- 47 replies
- 23k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 597 views
-
- 109 replies
- 48.2k views
-
- 573 replies
- 276.1k views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 92 replies
- 16.6k views
-
- 14 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 14 replies
- 3.3k views
.thumb.jpg.dd92759bb2822fdc7e13dd70abd53569.jpg)
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts352.5k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
-
I'm at a point where I ALMOST see no point in shooting log profiles. There are a few good ones, but most require more grading after a utility LUT is applied and/or creates scenarios where everybody's footage looks pretty much exactly the same. So if you're just slapping on a LUT and calling it a day, for 9 out of 10 shots, you could just use a standard rec709 picture profile and get similar results. With the advent of 10bit video, in recent years, most standard picture profiles look even better than they ever have with thicker color and near perfect skintones. Sure there are instances when you may need the extra stop or two of dynamic range a Log profile offers, or a specific LUT gets you a relatively quick look by shooting Log, but again... 9 out of 10 times, a slightly tweaked Rec709 picture profile will end up looking better and get you there so much easier without worrying about CSTs and color pipelines... especially since damn near ever Log profile is just trying to emulate Arri LogC which in turn was designed to emulate film. Speaking of, I have the Arri LogC3 software key on my GH6 and it's pretty good... better than vLog but it's still noisy as hell with ugly chroma noise in the midtones and shadows so I recently went back to CineLikeD and V and I am back to making a couple contrast and saturation adjustments and being happy with it. I'm sure there is a slight hit in DR, but nothing so drastic that I'm surprised or wish I shot in Log instead. So Log is cool, I'm glad it's available, but it's fairly unnecessary in most situations and can cause a bigger headache. -
No idea about y'all but, the more I find the more I see it as a no-brainer purchase, no other way, plus stabilization to say the least : ) https://www.stufftaiwan.com/2026/10/08/vivo-x500-pro-max＋400mm增距鏡周杰倫演唱會實測，解鎖4k動態照片/ And the guy or gal or whoever is behind the cam shoots bad as hell... However, with current and proper AI (am I Mr. Trump's enemy from now on? LOL) techniques, I'm pretty sure we can all get incredible results out of it, external SSD and all ;- )
-
By John Matthews · Posted
Went for a walk this morning. I was able to make a short video: Sorry for the music. Everything is hand-held. Shot it at various frame rates. Most everthing shot in GoPro Log 2 (the slow-mo shots are in Natural) and plopped into a timeline for cutting and added FilmConvert with the GoPro Mission 1 Pro and GoPro Log 2 profile. No grain was applied. Anyway, you'll get an idea of the colors, electronic stab, etc. I also wanted to say that I was able to update the ILS to the GoPro Labs firmware and use a QR code for putting a super-helpful histogram (better than the Lumix one on the GX800). -
Very cool! I'm so glad you are keeping this thread alive. One of my first interchangeable lens cameras was the eos-m and I loved that camera. The last time I used it, almost 10 years ago, was when I tested Magic Lanter on it... I did test the raw but it was pretty abysmal back then... so I was more interested in the bitrate bump. Shortly afterwards, my camera path led me through BM and into my 5D iii, so the the eos-m just sat in the closet for years. A couple years ago I was thinking I'd take it out and mess with it again. Hadn't really thought about using it in years, so I grabbed it from the closet, charged one of my old batteries and pushed the on button... and nothing. I just figured it died... so back into the closet it went. I recently realized it may need a card with ML boot flag (or whatever it's called) on it. I ordered some new batteries and I'm going to figure out which cards are good for the new builds and cross my fingers. Anyway @QuickHitRecord thanks again for keeping this topic alive. No disrespect to the other forum members, but basic camera chat about new releases is fun and all, but the reason I started posting on EOS HD was because of posts like this.
-
