Jump to content

Subforums

  1. The EOSHD YouTube Channel   (24,021 visits to this link)

    Follow Andrew Reid on YouTube

17,325 topics in this forum

  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 2m views
    • 1.2k replies
    • 515.7k views
    • 706 replies
    • 336.1k views
    • 9.1k replies
    • 2.8m views
    • 0 replies
    • 2.5k views
  2. Panasonic GH6 1 2 3 4 88

    • 1.8k replies
    • 801.9k views
  3. Choosing bad video quality

    • 5 replies
    • 139 views
    • 29 replies
    • 936 views
    • 6 replies
    • 135 views
    • 57 replies
    • 8.8k views
    • 7 replies
    • 457 views
    • 22 replies
    • 2.4k views
    • 2 replies
    • 97 views
    • 28 replies
    • 50.3k views
    • 74 replies
    • 12.5k views
    • 0 replies
    • 22 views
    • 5 replies
    • 299 views
    • 11 replies
    • 637 views
    • 5 replies
    • 982 views
    • 0 replies
    • 159 views
    • 3 replies
    • 833 views
    • 18 replies
    • 3.3k views
    • 32 replies
    • 3.5k views
  4. Nikon Zr is coming 1 2 3 4 26

    • 517 replies
    • 174k views
  5. Lumix S9 1 2 3 4 16

    • 315 replies
    • 150.5k views
    • 47 replies
    • 22.6k views
    • 4 replies
    • 1k views
    • 2 replies
    • 538 views
    • 109 replies
    • 47.5k views
    • 573 replies
    • 275.3k views
    • 13 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 92 replies
    • 15.9k views
    • 14 replies
    • 1.3k views
  6. My new lens?

    • 7 replies
    • 2.8k views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 14 replies
    • 3.2k views
    • 28 replies
    • 16k views
    • 24 replies
    • 3.8k views
    • 3 replies
    • 836 views
    • 74 replies
    • 9.2k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.3k
    • Total Posts
      352.5k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      35,660
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    lickrocknalmo1981
    Joined
  • Posts

    • some client work i did this year that switches between nicer video camera - iphone and minidv:  i think the artifacts from minidv are really cool in an age of constant video recordings from phones and mirrorless cameras. the built in super long zooms on these old camcorders are also super useful. 
    • It's surprising to me because I was around for the early digital cameras and then the quality wasn't considered "good" and we hoped for something better in the future. I think it's nostalgic for someone younger though. Their baby pictures were taken with these things and to them, not me, it brings back a time.  So, I get it. But the Charmera does not look like film. It looks like early digital camera.s Which is cool. I don't like the jello-cam rolling shutter on the videos, but again, for some people that's nostalgic. Object-wise, I've never seen a Charmera in person but seems like it's fun. In a culture in which having fashion accessories matters, then it makes sense. If you're the cool kid with the little clicky device then you're considered cool.  I think the lack of screen gives a sense of chance. You won't know until later just how (bad) it turned out.  Anyway, it's fun and I think it's a cool thing. Someday I'll find one at a thrift store for five bucks and I'll probably get it.  So, this interest in early digicams has made me re-asses my drawer of mostly broken pocket digitals I've collected over the years. I went through it and found a small Nikon Coolpix S570. 12Megapixals, 5 times zoom.  Not broken. I think I stopped using it because I wanted something that saved in raw. This only has JPEG. Anyways, I've been shooting with it and it's nice. Not good in low light though. The JPEG compression isn't bad. It's kinda fun and it's nice having a zoom lens. (My phone doesn't have one.)
    • I did a few more tests this morning. I wanted to check the 4K IQ, and I tried everything I could to induce moiré, but to no avail. I scrutinized the Red, Green, and Blue channels as well, and the results were impressive. I'm fairly certain it's due to the image processing because it blows away the already respectable 4K image from my Panasonic GX800. And all of my tests were done with HyperSmooth on; it only gets better with it off. I also tried my Konica 300mm f/4.5 on a tripod in 8K. I'm not sure there's much point in using 8K for distant landscapes, but for closer subjects, why not? I still think 4K looks just as good. One thing this camera is not is a 1080p camera. IMO, they should let us use 10-bit in 1080p, but they don't. Also, when you switch to 1080p, it changes the color profile too. You have to go back and reset it when you resume shooting in 4K or 8K. I think I'll just stay away from the 1080p modes unless I really need the 480fps and up.
    • Apples to oranges, not exactly the same but I basically agree with you : )  Huawei Collector's Edition is going today for EUR 2250 / USD 2500, so too much for a camera phone... We buy a ZR for less : D A much fair price would be around the EUR 1500 mark... We buy the Honor/ARRI (not the Robot*, more expensive, especially comparing with other gimbal counterparts) and the 16/1TB version (against the Huawei's 16/512) for less these days... And you double the tele range with. So, a more interesting deal IMHO. Let's see what Black Friday brings us next month... - E.   * For the same ticket you pay the other Honor/ARRI (without teleconverters, for a fraction of that Huawei's Ruiying Z10 module zoom lens) and you can even pick 1x Luna Ultra or Osmo 4P... ; ) two-in-one purchase, that is, Huawei is decidedly playing a pricey game for now : ) Makes me closer to be prone to end out there instead ; ) In any case, overheating has been my beef against these capture devices...
    • Emanuel, I've been on many concerts 🙂 Mostly rock, pop groups and individual performers. 🙂 More or less concept is the same as Sony maybe Honor has a better implementation. IMHO it will have low market demand. I am motioncam user and visit their community forum from time to time. How many members do you think this forum has ? It recently crossed the 10K mark. More than half of the people who bought the application will run a few test clips and forget about it. Let's assume it has 10K active users or 3x this number. It is still a tiny number compared to the billions of smartphones sold per year. While the economics work for the application and team of 2 people I doubt it will work for the design and production of an add on module + related application and software that can be used only with specific smartphone model.  Smarthones are primarily communication devices, then cameras. It doesn't make sense to spend 2000 Euro for a smartphone only because of a particular camera module or add on. 1000 Euro for a phone with decent cameras + 1000 Euro for a better cameras with interchangeable lenses makes more sense. Again IMHO those add on camera / lenses, telephoto lenses, robot phones, they will not last long. We'll see. Let us know if you buy this particular smartphone / camera.
×
×
  • Create New...