Subforums
-
-
- 28
- posts
17,117 topics in this forum
-
- 24 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.5m views
-
- 2 replies
- 11k views
-
- 527 replies
- 178.1k views
-
- 29 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 664 replies
- 82.7k views
-
- 21 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 552 views
-
- 11 replies
- 626 views
-
- 12 replies
- 2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 324 views
-
- 14 replies
- 4.2k views
-
- 48 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 23 replies
- 5.6k views
-
- 13 replies
- 10.3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 71 replies
- 11.8k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 82 replies
- 14.9k views
-
- 16 replies
- 823 views
-
- 75 replies
- 16.5k views
-
- 13 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 511 replies
- 81.6k views
-
Anyone with a Panasonic S5 II or S9 interested in testing my in-cam ARRI compatible LOG C3 profile? 1 2
- 35 replies
- 9.4k views
-
- 9 replies
- 651 views
-
- 42 replies
- 6.8k views
-
- 29 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 83 replies
- 10.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 532 views
-
- 234 replies
- 87.7k views
-
- 8 replies
- 4.1k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 429 replies
- 126.4k views
-
- 88 replies
- 10.5k views
-
- 723 replies
- 226.6k views
-
- 4 replies
- 687 views
-
- 23 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 631 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 22 replies
- 1.6k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.1k
-
Total Posts348.6k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
I didn’t actually but did same sensor cameras which would have been D3/D700 or something of that era because I was all Nikon back then. I am getting curious about the Sigma BF now…but must resist, must resist, must resist… -
I think they saw the high prices the previous RX1 models go for after 10 or more years. As for a electronic tech goes, the RX1 line has held up like no other tech out there, maybe only surpassed by the Digital Bolex videocam and the Fujifil X100 line in this regard. Other than those two outliers, I can't find any other old or very old digital cameras that still garner such high prices relative to their age. So Sony saw that and the recent compact camera fad and thought that they were leaving a ton of cash on the table. -
Just out of curiosity, did you by any chance ever shoot with the older Nikon DF? Seems it was a banger for stills.
-
Well the 28-200 is going back. Hate it. Suspected I might… I just cannot stand slow, variable aperture zooms, even in good light. Going to find me a used Sigma 28-45mm f1.8 ASAP and just skip the second whole long zoom thing as after all, I already have the f4 70-200. Oh well, I tried. Switched it for the Sigma 28-70mm f2.8 and phew, crisis over 😉 The S1Rii is working out OK so far for stills. Not as snappy as my A7RV which itself is not as snappy as my Zf, but neither of those fit in with The Greater Plan. S9 still my fave for video.
-
By zerocool22 · Posted
Allthough it is not entirenly only my issue. Clients (production companies) ask footage to be shot in log. And while it is no longer my issue but the editor or color grader issue. I prefer the colours coming straight out of camera to be nice. Especially when they are combinging footage from different shooters and camera's. I don't want to be the guy where they have the most work in post with. As most production companies ask feedback forms from everyone involved, and if an editor writes down "I prefer the footage from shooter B because the colours are ready to go, and I am shooter A, then I might move down the list of shooters to call for a new project". Alllthough I will try to always use the C500 ii for these types of clients when possible. Where the colours are stellar straight out of camera.
-
