Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,530 visits to this link)
17,301 topics in this forum
-
- 701 replies
- 314.3k views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 477.8k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.9m views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.7m views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 771.6k views
-
- 4 replies
- 200 views
-
- 10 replies
- 462 views
-
- 565 replies
- 266.3k views
-
- 31 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 61 replies
- 20.6k views
-
- 4 replies
- 424 views
-
Internal 32-bit float stereo paired with lossless 120mm reach from a 20mm lens — all inside a genuinely pocket-sized 10-bit 1-inch sensor gimbal camera? 1 2 3
- 44 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 129 replies
- 64.2k views
-
- 20 replies
- 840 views
-
- 106 replies
- 78.4k views
-
- 83 replies
- 9.8k views
-
- 60 replies
- 6.4k views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 12 replies
- 748 views
-
- 6 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 19 replies
- 13.1k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 650 views
-
- 14 replies
- 9k views
-
- 49 replies
- 4.1k views
-
- 14 replies
- 7.8k views
-
- 2 replies
- 521 views
-
- 0 replies
- 609 views
-
- 11 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 20 replies
- 2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 121 replies
- 67.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 620 views
-
- 0 replies
- 700 views
-
- 0 replies
- 714 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 314 replies
- 152.9k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts352k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By Nicolas-r02 · Posted
Thank you. I'm still hopeful that someone with a Blackmagic camera and a Rawlite filter will post this online. It wouldn't take long to put together something done properly, and I'm sure it would be helpful to others. In the meantime, that's a lot of money based on promises. -
I've seen some before and after tests a long time ago and they do work, but it's reduced not completely eliminated. I understand your frustration because they seem to cost a lot and it's hard to know what you're getting ahead of time. -
And I am far from alone on this one: https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/cameras/sony-rx10-v-review -
PS: That 600mm reach makes it interesting if/when it costs less than a grand... mandatory then? OK, less than a grand and a half! : P Anything over $2K would put it in a different category, for sure. And not only for wild life... Nonetheless. Disclaimer: FX30 + 16-300mm owner here. Has the FX30 + 16-300mm killed the RX10 V? ; ) The FX30 gives you a cinema body: APS-C/Super 35, 10-bit 4:2:2, S-Log3, S-Cinetone, 14+ stops of claimed latitude, 4K 120fps, active cooling, dual card slots, full-size HDMI, better rigging options, better audio with the XLR handle, and interchangeable lenses. The RX10 V is now much stronger than the RX10 IV for video: 4K60, 4K120 cropped — probably around 1.43x vs 1.62x on the FX30 — 10-bit 4:2:2, S-Log3, S-Cinetone, LUT support, 4K30 USB streaming, digital audio through the MI shoe, and AI subject recognition, whatever that means... But it still has one SD card slot, a fixed lens, a tilting rather than fully articulating screen, no IBIS, and remains more of a high-end bridge/photo camera than a cinema tool. Sorry to be the party pooper but yes: the RX10 V has more reach, about +33% compared with the FX30 + 16-300mm combo, plus an EVF and slightly less weight. The RX10 V lens is faster in pure exposure terms, but once you factor in sensor size, f/2.4–4 on a 1-inch sensor works out at roughly f/6.5–10.8 full-frame equivalent. The FX30 + Sigma 16-300mm is roughly f/5.3–10.1 equivalent on APS-C/Super 35, so between 28mm and 100mm equivalent the FX30/Sigma combo can be up to about one stop better in equivalent-aperture terms. The FX30 already gives you a 24-450mm equivalent range with that Sigma lens, plus everything above, plus interchangeable lenses, for a similar price or even less.
-
-
