Jump to content

Subforums

  1. The EOSHD YouTube Channel   (24,126 visits to this link)

    Follow Andrew Reid on YouTube

17,328 topics in this forum

    • 1.3k replies
    • 527.9k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 2m views
    • 706 replies
    • 341.1k views
    • 9.1k replies
    • 2.9m views
    • 0 replies
    • 2.6k views
  2. Panasonic GH6 1 2 3 4 88

    • 1.8k replies
    • 813.2k views
    • 2 replies
    • 29 views
    • 70 replies
    • 4.1k views
    • 18 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 48 views
    • 33 replies
    • 4.2k views
    • 13 replies
    • 963 views
  3. Log is Boring

    • 17 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 30 replies
    • 4.6k views
    • 1 reply
    • 537 views
    • 548 replies
    • 248.4k views
    • 322 replies
    • 163.9k views
    • 17 replies
    • 3.3k views
  4. Nikon Zr is coming 1 2 3 4 27

    • 521 replies
    • 180.2k views
    • 1 reply
    • 375 views
    • 6 replies
    • 653 views
    • 29 replies
    • 51.5k views
    • 57 replies
    • 10.4k views
    • 7 replies
    • 836 views
    • 22 replies
    • 3.3k views
    • 74 replies
    • 14.5k views
    • 5 replies
    • 615 views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 18 replies
    • 3.9k views
  5. Lumix S9 1 2 3 4 16

    • 315 replies
    • 153.3k views
    • 47 replies
    • 23.4k views
    • 4 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 2 replies
    • 714 views
    • 109 replies
    • 49k views
    • 573 replies
    • 278.2k views
    • 13 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 92 replies
    • 17.9k views
    • 14 replies
    • 1.6k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.3k
    • Total Posts
      352.6k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      35,911
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    dislitipet1983
    Joined
  • Posts

    • The ONLY thing 'missing' for me is IBIS but curious about how this gyro data will work. Not pulling the trigger just yet but waiting to see what LUMIX do themselves, rumoured to be 'something similar' next month. But so far, so good for the FP2, - it could become my workhorse in 2027...
    • Most importantly, but missing off these lists is internal L-log and internal 10-bit. Two really key things that were missing on the original. Also 32bit audio!  It's a shame the pin connections on the side are different from the original though.    
    • Key specs via PP: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigma-fp2-everything-is-better-for-the-second-gen-modular-mirrorless-camera/ 24MP partially stacked CMOS sensor Up to 20fps stills Video up to 6K open gate, including ProRes RAW output to SSD Two USB-C sockets Full-sized HDMI port Tilt up/down 3.2″ 2.1M dot rear LCD Optional 5.76M dot electronic viewfinder Optional OM System/Panasonic compatible hotshoe 70GB internal memory Larger, 16Wh battery, giving 370 shots/charge rating 460g (16.2oz) including battery and card The Sigma fp2 will be available from November 11th at a price of $2199, body only, or $2749 with the new EVF-21 accessory or $2749 with the I-series 50mm F2 DG lens.
    • Sigma FP II has officially been announced.  
    • There are so many trade-offs here it's impossible to actually discuss all of them in any sensible way, that's why I suggest simply trying them yourself, as the proof is in the pudding. The recommendation of 1/200s is 4 times shorter than 1/50, so the recommendation for 13mm and 11mm lenses are vastly different despite the focal lengths being quite similar.  I understand this is a generic recommendation, but that only works for generic people, and I have never met any of those before! I'm assuming your statement about the ILS producing more detail in RAW is about still images?  That's a whole other thing than video and these tradeoffs all go completely different since the modern standard for getting sharp images seems to require a shutter of 1/5000 or faster, if I go by the fact that people are photographing action sports and seem to want sub-pixel sharpness instead of their images representing the fact that there is any motion involved at all in the scene. Anyway, I'll leave you to your assessments, but I can tell you that if you shoot video on a potato and upload it to YT at 480p with a 180 shutter and compare that to video shot on the BM 17K URSA with a 45 shutter and uploaded at 8K, there will be people who prefer the 180 shutter just because the motion is so important to them.  This is perhaps a drastic example, but a more practical one would be why anyone at all still shoots on 16mm.  It is completely technically inferior in literally every regard, and yet, people still pay a huge amount of money for the pleasure.
×
×
  • Create New...