Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,828 visits to this link)
17,227 topics in this forum
-
- 1.2k replies
- 435.4k views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.5m views
-
- 0 replies
- 1k views
-
- 700 replies
- 290.1k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 720k views
-
- 141 replies
- 42.7k views
-
- 11 replies
- 823 views
-
- 2 replies
- 86 views
-
- 4 replies
- 236 views
-
- 31 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 47 replies
- 16.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 194 views
-
- 552 replies
- 249.6k views
-
- 21 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 95 replies
- 37.6k views
-
- 12 replies
- 9.8k views
-
- 8 replies
- 742 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 36 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 64 replies
- 35.1k views
-
- 468 replies
- 126.3k views
-
- 11 replies
- 6.8k views
-
- 48 replies
- 12.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 411 views
-
- 0 replies
- 460 views
-
- 0 replies
- 351 views
-
- 28 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 85 replies
- 8.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 427 views
-
- 3 replies
- 816 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 57 replies
- 6.4k views
-
- 67 replies
- 35.3k views
-
- 87 replies
- 64.7k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 892 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 686 views
-
- 5 replies
- 6.9k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts351k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Anyone got a recommendation for a half cage for the S1ii? I can't find many. I have a Small Rig Black Mamba on the S5ii and it's pretty good. I could get one for the S1ii but as I only really use the cage for attaching a hand grip on the left hand side of the camera I was thinking a half cage might be better with overheating in mind. -
By John Matthews · Posted
@Ilkka Nissila, I think you're chasing a very different camera than me. Just because a camera is small doesn't necessarily mean it must have bad ergos. Panasonic has said nothing at CP+ 2026, except a stupid microphone that supposedly someone wants. In this interview, they said virtually nothing, a feat in itself. Really, I think they should have been a little more reassuring to the customers. No investor would have watched this anyway. -
By Ilkka Nissila · Posted
That's a rather absolute statement and probably easy to debunk. Also, hinting progress isn't making an announcement of any kind. You'd probably agree that it shouldn't be expected that Lumix would make a announcement with CINED either. But, saying there's development is certainly doable. There is always development. My point is just that mentioning an upcoming product too much before its launch can negatively affect the sales of current products and could be seen as acting against the interests of the company's owners. Obviously if the current products are not competitive, then this is an issue, but still, I think most companies would prefer to promote to consumers what they have rather than what they may have in the future. Of course, when trying to get investment into the company, then future products become critical. Does it? This is mature tech now and certainly not on the cutting edge. I think the cost is more in weight than anything else. Although, the E-P7 is only 337g and has proper 5-axis IBIS. IBIS was originally developed by Konica-Minolta and later Sony bought the camera division and got this technology. Olympus developed improvements to the technology. Other companies probably need to pay license fees to use this technology, including Panasonic. The least expensive Canon camera with IBIS is the R7 which costs $1,549.00 at B&H; for Nikon it is the Z5II ($1,596.95); Sony A6700 is $1,598.00. These manufacturers all have much less expensive camera models which do not feature IBIS. Since it requires motors and sensors, and in case of Nikon, they also use a separate locking mechanism to avoid the sensor moving while the IBIS is not active, these all add to the cost and complexity and make the camera slightly bigger. There is also heat dissipation to consider (it is more difficult to transfer heat from the sensor if it is mounted on a lightweight moving platform). Since the E-P7 is also micro four thirds, it could be used with the same lenses as the Panasonic MFT cameras, so why not use that for situations requiring extremely small size and low weight? Or does that camera miss something that Panasonic could offer without making the camera larger? My feeling is that if they can do stuff in a phone, they could also do it in a camera. Cameras are sold at most in a hundred thousand copies (or so) per model, whereas a phone can sell a hundred million copies, so the phone has the advantage of a 1000x larger scale of production. The camera manufacturers certainly cannot do all the things that phone manufacturers can do because of the cost of development of a camera or a lineup of cameras is divided among several orders of magnitude smaller number of units. there's been an "Americanization" of these cameras, meaning bigger, chunkier cameras and seemingly without too much consideration for how components could be miniaturized. For me small cameras don't work as I have fairly large hands and it's not possible to hold a camera like many of the smaller Olympus/OM-D models comfortably in my hands, I'd be holding the camera in my fingertips, and the controls are too small and difficult to use. A camera like the Zf is just about the smallest I can handle (with added grip) and consider it a comfortable experience. Miniaturization requires development of custom integrated circuits which is very expensive. Sony can do it because that's their main thing and they make so many electronics products they have the special knowledge on how to do that, and it seems they've made it the overwhelming priority (high performance in the smallest possible size). -
I'll genuinely appreciate that a lot. Please preserve the gh2 history, don't let it vanish -
Private Lady In Your City - No Verify - Anonymous Adult Dating https://PrivateLadyEscorts.com [url=https://PrivateLadyEscorts.com] Private Lady In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Sex Dating - No Verify NEW GIRLS [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/maria-luna-94.html]Maria Luna[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/sam-81.html]Sam[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/busty-anastasia-52.html]Busty Anastasia[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/kate-katysha-117.html]Kate Katysha[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/emma-47.html]Emma[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/bamby-belle-104.html]Bamby Belle[/url]
-
