Jump to content

17,144 topics in this forum

    • 28 replies
    • 26.9k views
    • 537 replies
    • 232.5k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 1.6m views
    • 2 replies
    • 18.7k views
    • 29 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 37 replies
    • 13.9k views
    • 347 replies
    • 73.6k views
    • 90 replies
    • 31k views
    • 240 replies
    • 128k views
    • 2 replies
    • 336 views
    • 12 replies
    • 747 views
    • 32 replies
    • 15.3k views
    • 3 replies
    • 3k views
    • 3 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 27 replies
    • 30.7k views
    • 192 replies
    • 43k views
    • 1 reply
    • 3.4k views
    • 1 reply
    • 390 views
    • 10 replies
    • 5.7k views
    • 681 replies
    • 254.2k views
  2. new camera purchase 1 2 3 4 5

    • 90 replies
    • 67.6k views
    • 29 replies
    • 24.9k views
  3. Video on Sony a7iv

    • 0 replies
    • 3k views
    • 4 replies
    • 4.3k views
    • 9.1k replies
    • 2.3m views
    • 83 replies
    • 58k views
    • 57 replies
    • 28.9k views
    • 15 replies
    • 5.6k views
    • 123 replies
    • 75.3k views
    • 66 replies
    • 42.9k views
    • 26 replies
    • 25.2k views
    • 36 replies
    • 16.3k views
    • 44 replies
    • 38.1k views
    • 26 replies
    • 16.2k views
    • 33 replies
    • 16.1k views
    • 3 replies
    • 7.8k views
    • 12 replies
    • 9.4k views
    • 26 replies
    • 15.7k views
    • 56 replies
    • 24.2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 7k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.2k
    • Total Posts
      349.6k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,317
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    KnutL
    Joined
  • Posts

    • Is there somewhere where we can see an example of this problem vs. another camera with a better implementation of h.265? I think it's understandable that when a highly compressed video codec is used, there is noticeable quality loss and the manufacturer is trying to mitigate this with some algorithmic processing of the data. Is it really the case that the quality of the h.265 is worse than in a previous model from Panasonic or another camera in a similar price class, or could it be a case of increasing expectations over time as we see high-quality footage using better screens more often? 
    • Is this something? ; ) To me, this outcome doesn’t seem negligible at all. Quite the contrary. No one invented the wheel this time. But it seems that has now been perfected, evolving in a way even the most oblivious cannot miss. To me, it would/will likely be the 1st round :- )
    • That's true!  I did guess that.  Apparently my guess was off, as was my memory of the ZR price.  Thanks for the reminder/correction!  😅  
    • Well, I was responding to all the comparisons with those more expensive cameras. This is your own statement: "Though I'd also guess that outside of that sort of over/under test, the ZR will have better apparent/usable dynamic range than the OG Komodo and maybe even vs the Komodo-X which is noticeably better than the OG." Also, for future reference, these are the current prices for the ZR and Pyxis 6K on B&H:        
    • Wait, so the very small $1,800 camera has compromises when compared with a series of larger $3,000ish cameras? I think it's useful to understand the characteristics of the camera, but for me, the more useful comparisons would be to other small cameras in the <$2,000 price range - i.e. S9, X-M5, and even maybe EOS R6 II/S5 II (though they're a bit bulkier IIRC).
×
×
  • Create New...