Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,825 visits to this link)
17,227 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.5m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 435k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1k views
-
- 700 replies
- 290k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 719.7k views
-
- 8 replies
- 728 views
-
- 0 replies
- 7 views
-
- 4 replies
- 173 views
-
- 31 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 47 replies
- 16.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 178 views
-
- 552 replies
- 249.6k views
-
- 21 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 95 replies
- 37.6k views
-
- 12 replies
- 9.8k views
-
- 8 replies
- 726 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 36 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 64 replies
- 35.1k views
-
- 468 replies
- 126.2k views
-
- 11 replies
- 6.8k views
-
- 48 replies
- 12.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 401 views
-
- 0 replies
- 452 views
-
- 0 replies
- 344 views
-
- 28 replies
- 4.6k views
-
- 85 replies
- 8.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 419 views
-
- 3 replies
- 808 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 57 replies
- 6.3k views
-
- 67 replies
- 35.2k views
-
- 87 replies
- 64.7k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 880 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 677 views
-
- 5 replies
- 6.9k views
-
- 55 replies
- 28.5k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts351k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By John Matthews · Posted
That's a rather absolute statement and probably easy to debunk. Also, hinting progress isn't making an announcement of any kind. You'd probably agree that it shouldn't be expected that Lumix would make a announcement with CINED either. But, saying there's development is certainly doable. Does it? This is mature tech now and certainly not on the cutting edge. I think the cost is more in weight than anything else. Although, the E-P7 is only 337g and has proper 5-axis IBIS. I agree with this, except the new market could easily accept premium compacts too. There's also room for in-between products similar to the GX9, which wasn't really a bottom feeder either. A newer version of that camera would be exactly what I want, perhaps even smaller and lighter and even more premium. My feeling is that if they can do stuff in a phone, they could also do it in a camera. @Andrew - EOSHDwas right in saying that there's been an "Americanization" of these cameras, meaning bigger, chunkier cameras and seemingly without too much consideration for how components could be miniaturized. (I believe he said something like this in his GH6 review). The difference in size between the GH6/7 and a GH1 is massive; unapologetically ignoring all advancements in smaller components. I want smaller with M43, not more capable if it means massive bodies. Yeah, that really depends on the manufacturer. They're always giving up something, with a few exceptions. -
Hey everyone! I've just recently purchased a gh2 and I was looking for people who might still have any gh2 patches available since the personal-view site is down where they hosted most of the gh2 patches If someone could provide any sort of links to gh2 patches available, that would be highly appreciated -
-
-
Surely not ; ) But, it's something people out there do wonder about, y'all know? Here's just one (and finest) example — do not kill the messenger! : D I know this forum (or a few of you to be more precise ; ) loves to underestimate or undermine these insignificant devices... but I really also wonder if... it's not time for a change? What do you guys think? : ) Simon Wyndham's input (part of Alister Chapman's circle / aka Mr. XDCAM = given his Sony connection back in those early days) source : X
-
