Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,287 visits to this link)
17,289 topics in this forum
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 461.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 700 replies
- 305.9k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 752.8k views
-
- 76 replies
- 6.9k views
-
- 23 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 9 replies
- 239 views
-
- 0 replies
- 99 views
-
- 5 replies
- 529 views
-
- 314 replies
- 147k views
-
- 12 replies
- 5.6k views
-
- 51 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 16 replies
- 776 views
-
- 30 replies
- 33.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 180 views
-
- 8 replies
- 13.1k views
-
- 45 replies
- 12.3k views
-
- 13 replies
- 516 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 591 views
-
- 7 replies
- 407 views
-
- 7 replies
- 3k views
-
- 120 replies
- 63.4k views
-
- 560 replies
- 259.5k views
-
- 18 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 347 views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 57 replies
- 18.8k views
-
- 60 replies
- 19.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 788 views
-
- 126 replies
- 58.2k views
-
- 88 replies
- 58.4k views
-
- 71 replies
- 34.3k views
-
- 14 replies
- 980 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 10 replies
- 861 views
-
- 79 replies
- 55.7k views
-
- 26 replies
- 19.8k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.8k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
Oh, I wasn't getting as fancy as anybody's sensor stack or anything like that. I just meant smaller lenses which didn't need to decide to have an image circle that covers S35 or any other larger sensors. The Laowa 7.5mm that you mentioned is a fantastic example of a lens designed for Micro 4/3 and I'd be shocked if its image circle would cover S35. I'd contrast that with something like a Rokinon Xeen. You can go buy one with an MFT mount, but it'll be the same design/glass that you'd find on the same model of Xeen for FF. It'll work fine, of course - but the lens is bigger and heavier than it needs to be. In that case, of course, there's an EF mount version which would make more sense on a focal reducer. -
By Andrew - EOSHD · Posted
Does that mean we may stop hearing about action cams on the EOSHD Forum? -
Well it looks like they really need these new models to be a hit. Full story here… https://www.redsharknews.com/gopro-8k-going-concern-warning -
I am sure i have read / heard the internals are the same, so i presume its just different housings. Considering the pricing i guess which ever is dearer to make, takes a small hit on the profit margins. which is probably the mission1 ils, but then its probably going to sell less, so they can probably live with that. It is a niche product i think as well. I see the mission 1ils as a stepping stone. Once you have had a gopro or other action camera and done different things with it or if you have some kind of cinema expectations, you can become aware of some its limitations. I think the ils will help with bridging that gap perhaps even dragging things up a level. I suspect that you might even need two gropros the mission one for traditional gopro look and the mission 1 ils for the stuff the mission 1 cant do. Be interesting to see how things pan out. We have all seen some amazing stuff done with gopros however that all comes from a core group of people with a gopro , maybe 10% perhaps alot less then 10% i'm not sure. I was inspired by chris benchetler chasing el nino a series on snow skiing enough to buy a gopro 9. I realize he had a whole crew and helicopters to help however the gopros used for the pov was amazing. The only issue not a lot of snow around here... I'll have to continue with my thoughts later, got to go to town otherwise people are going to starve...🙄 -
Thanks! The more I get into this, and the more I think about what my own associations might have been, the more I realise how variable things are. Obviously people talk about how there isn't a single "look" for film, or even for an individual stock, as it depended on where it was developed and even who was running the machine that day, but if we zoom out then the look of film for one person might have been Hollywood movies at their local Megaplex and for someone else it might have been indy films at a tiny theatre with a super-worn projector, and for someone else it might have been the 8mm or 16mm their parents shot and projected. Even the examples on YT are stunningly different. I've linked to these videos before, but it's just amazing to me how different they are... S16mm on Bolex at night (IIRC on 500T and potentially pushed a stop?) S16 on Laowa Nanomorphs (Vision3 50D): I can tell you, the 35mm projection of Goodfellas I saw was absolutely nowhere near how sharp and clean this is! That's very encouraging to hear. I've shared this in a number of places and mostly got no feedback so I was wondering if it was more a case of "if you have nothing good to say then don't say anything", or potentially "you can't be serious, this guy is so far from the mark it's a lost cause and there's no point in me saying anything!" I didn't think I was doing that badly, but with film emulation some people have rather exacting standards! Assuming I've reached the goal of it not being obviously fake, I'm thinking about what I would do to grade it further, and the thing that comes to mind is a split-tone and the colour. Unfortunately the split-tone in FLC (and IIRC the separate OFX plugin in Resolve) aren't that great, so once again it looks like I might have to go the custom route. I'm also keen to play with the Subtractive Sat, Richness, and Bleach Bypass sliders too as I think they might be the key to getting a range of interesting looks. Some people do film emulations and have the saturated areas super dense, whereas others don't emphasise it so much. I remember someone posting their film emulation power grade to the LGG forums and the saturated areas were so dark I thought they were playing a practical joke on the forums, but people gave serious replies and they responded seriously too, so I just shook my head and didn't post any feedback.
-
