Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,176 visits to this link)
17,278 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 455.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 700 replies
- 301.6k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 744.4k views
-
- 28 replies
- 600 views
-
- 2 replies
- 47 views
-
- 3 replies
- 145 views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 26 replies
- 19k views
-
- 78 replies
- 54.3k views
-
- 118 replies
- 61.3k views
-
- 125 replies
- 55.4k views
-
- 69 replies
- 33.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 105 replies
- 41.5k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 248 views
-
- 15 replies
- 712 views
-
- 9 replies
- 995 views
-
- 0 replies
- 397 views
-
- 4 replies
- 448 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 44 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 307 views
-
- 56 replies
- 5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 406 views
-
- 14 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 373 views
-
- 59 replies
- 18.6k views
-
- 32 replies
- 6k views
-
- 122 replies
- 24.4k views
-
- 10 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 5 replies
- 750 views
-
- 470 replies
- 139.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 840 views
-
- 27 replies
- 5.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 488 views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.5k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.6k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
I now think that calling it the L10 was also a mistake. I watched the Micro Four Nerds video about it earlier anud the camera looked very big in the presenter's hands. I looked it up the Panasonic L10 on cameradecision and compared it to some other cameras and was outraged by how much bigger it was than the LX100. Then I noticed something about 10 megapixels and realized that the Panasonic L10 was a 10 megapixel Micro 4/3 camera from 2007. The Panasonic Lumix L10, on the other hand, is quite small. Was L10 such a great name that they couldn't change it after somebody pointed out that they already had a camera called the L10 and there would be some confusion from people who looked it up? -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
There are a bunch of weird 🔨 limitations on the R6 V. Nowadays, I'd expect a $2,500 video-centric camera to have shutter angle, at least. I'm not sure if a dedicated timecode port is a reasonable expectation, but in my mind, it should have one. Those would go al long way to making it a proper B cam to one of the cinema line cameras. -
The battle of Resolution vs Common Sense was over long ago and us consumers were the losers. -
By Andrew - EOSHD · Posted
The clearest sign yet that people's critical thinking might be in a dodgy place... 7K RAW on a content creator's camera with a tripod mount to shoot in portrait orientation. Now let's remind ourselves: Why do people shoot vertical video - because of phones How big is a phone screen - Erm, about 7 inches tall How much resolution is 7K in vertical format... 1000 dots per inch! What DPI are the best flagship phone displays? Well, iPhone 17 Pro Max is 2868 ×1320, so about 450dpi, and that is overkill already because to make out the individual pixels you need a microscope. Those Instagram stories never looked so good. -
Well, that intern got Panasonic 20 hours of clear air, but the intern from Canon that chose when to announce the R6V only managed to get about an hour before Sony released the A7R VI, so I guess everything is relative! Still, they're all for different audiences and at different price points etc. A $1500 P&S vs a $2500 FF camera vs a $4500 67MP beast. I doubt many people went "oh no, I preordered the L10 but the Sony has higher resolution - pre-order cancelled!"
-
