Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,262 visits to this link)
17,286 topics in this forum
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 459.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 700 replies
- 304.7k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 750.3k views
-
- 12 replies
- 263 views
-
- 5 replies
- 223 views
-
- 18 replies
- 921 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 61 replies
- 5.9k views
-
- 2 replies
- 490 views
-
- 7 replies
- 286 views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 120 replies
- 62.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 330 views
-
- 560 replies
- 257.6k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 2 replies
- 240 views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 57 replies
- 18.5k views
-
- 46 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 60 replies
- 19.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 701 views
-
- 126 replies
- 57.2k views
-
- 88 replies
- 57.9k views
-
- 71 replies
- 34k views
-
- 14 replies
- 856 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 10 replies
- 757 views
-
- 79 replies
- 55.3k views
-
- 26 replies
- 19.6k views
-
- 3 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 105 replies
- 42.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 458 views
-
- 15 replies
- 927 views
-
- 33 replies
- 6.5k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 561 views
-
- 4 replies
- 622 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.7k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By fuzzynormal · Posted
All that's true, but, honestly, I just always liked the image coming out of the GX7 better than the GH5. One's 1080 one's 4k, but ... something about that GX7 sensor. It's a damn old camera and this is a tangent from the OP, but did anybody ever figure out what was the secret sauce from that era of M43 LUMIX? I don''t think I imagined it. 😉 I mean, I look at stuff I did over a decade ago and still think, "shoot, that particular 1080 has a certain quality I like better than things I've done recently." For instance, from 2014: -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
Not quite. It's announced, but not available yet, last I checked - unless the latest Resolve 21 beta included it. Though if there's really something to inclusion of additional near-infrared wavelengths making the subtle difference for skin tones is true and if BMD's ir cut filter removes that wavelength, there would always be at least some difference. That said, a lot of the way that guy describes things remind me of someone explaining why they think their $4,000 toslink cable is giving richer midtones than someone else's $30 toslink cable. There seems to be a mix of some genuine understanding of things mixed in with pseudo-scientific bullshit. Regardless, even if were all 100% true and based in pure science, a decent colorist is a big equalizer for a bunch of differences in the SOOC image. 😅 -
By Aussie Ash · Posted
Looking at the bigger picture the current lead that ARRI has in this field can be eroded over the next few years by other camera manufacturers.As an example Black Magic is already up to Generation 6 color science and each generation is a step better than the last -
100%. ......and if you switch the question from "is it visible" to "is it important for the content of the video" the answer gets even clearer! -
Just thinking more about this, in a studio setup where everything is controlled the 'weaknesses' of older cameras often cease to be important or even relevant. IBIS doesn't matter, DR is irrelevant as you can just adjust lighting, size and weight don't matter, AF doesn't matter (and isn't desirable as the last thing you want is it focusing on your hands and the background whenever you move around), etc etc.
-
