Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,035 visits to this link)
17,263 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 447.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 700 replies
- 295.8k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 732.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 45 views
-
- 3 replies
- 102 views
-
- 60 replies
- 7.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 46 views
-
- 5 replies
- 409 views
-
- 121 replies
- 22.9k views
-
- 44 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 13 replies
- 292 views
-
- 120 replies
- 52.3k views
-
- 558 replies
- 252.8k views
-
- 9 replies
- 851 views
-
- 19 replies
- 470 views
-
- 3 replies
- 215 views
-
- 1 reply
- 213 views
-
- 5 replies
- 533 views
-
- 102 replies
- 39.8k views
-
- 29 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 244 views
-
- 1 reply
- 208 views
-
- 1 reply
- 252 views
-
- 58 replies
- 17.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 285 views
-
- 3 replies
- 357 views
-
- 0 replies
- 224 views
-
- 1 reply
- 687 views
-
- 5 replies
- 566 views
-
- 3 replies
- 326 views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 6 replies
- 536 views
-
- 2 replies
- 683 views
-
- 1 reply
- 457 views
-
- 0 replies
- 314 views
-
- 8 replies
- 650 views
-
- 1 reply
- 438 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.3k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By Aussie Ash · Posted
Their share price is up by 170 % compared to a nasty low in March so I think your theory is right ! Put on a show for the shareholders and speculators !!! They have lost market share as well -
By fuzzynormal · Posted
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1964095-REG/gopro_mission_1_pro_ils.html A "dumb" m43 mount on 1"? Honestly, from my perspective, it's a perfectly fine idea. If people out there don't understand why a dumb m43 mount is going onto a 1" sensor, those folks can just stick with GPro's fixed lens offerings. For those that know how to utilize the tool, it'll be fine and even a bit more than adequate -- as the people that'll use this gear/mount aren't really fretting about AF or e-iris. The big thing here, I think, is that with adapters you can put anything on there now. FF to C-mount. Hell, go back decades and buy some of the lenses camera companies were putting on their NTSC video cams, if that would work. Whatever. That said, my speculation is that they're not even that interested in this camera doing anything special sales-wise in the marketplace. Most likely this iteration of their product is a loss leader put out there for bragging rights. Basically, like, "Look, our products are a serious cinematic tool now!" "Lenses!" "Prestigious-Lens-Brand-This!" "Prestigious-Lens-Brand-That!" The real value in that sort of BS, in this era of YT marketing, is more than worthwhile. As for sensor size, the best footage I ever filmed in my life was captured on 1" sensors. So, it's hard for me to by too concerned about a small'ish sensor -- as far as that ever matters anyway. -
-
🤷♂️ sexy as fcuk ? But being serious, a question I have already asked myself and pondering further on… Ideally, I’d like a longer version of the photo 28-45mm f1.8, something like a 45-90mm f1.8 also with internal non-extending zoom, but no sign of that as of yet… -
It’s for a personal travel/ski film next winter in northern Finland (supplemented by a Sony rx0ii). I have several manual Nikon lens which I previously adapted to the Pocket 4k. The 85mm is a favourite. Plus all my M/ZM/VM (one of my favourites is the Voigtlander 50mm f3.5 Vintage Line Heliar). I want the Panasonic/Leica 100-400 (not sure why but it seems ridiculously fun to go to 800mm equivalent!). I’ve also ordered the 9mm f/1.7 Panasonic/Leica to replace a MFT Voigtlander 10.5 (far too heavy). A healthy mix of MF and AF. Shallow dof is certainly not a priority. Interestingly, I am finding that the “fun of using” is far more important that ultimate IQ… after all, none of this really matters!
-
