Jump to content

Subforums

  1. The EOSHD YouTube Channel   (22,341 visits to this link)

    Follow Andrew Reid on YouTube

17,187 topics in this forum

  1. Pinned topics

    • 0 replies
    • 56 views
    • 20 replies
    • 503 views
    • 1 reply
    • 97 views
    • 0 replies
    • 89 views
    • 0 replies
    • 104 views
    • 28 replies
    • 966 views
    • 458 replies
    • 103.2k views
    • 32 replies
    • 2.7k views
    • 12 replies
    • 569 views
    • 102 replies
    • 51.5k views
    • 2 replies
    • 145 views
    • 19 replies
    • 7.1k views
  2. what is motion cadence?

    • 13 replies
    • 262 views
    • 4 replies
    • 342 views
    • 3 replies
    • 261 views
    • 5 replies
    • 728 views
    • 1 reply
    • 512 views
    • 19 replies
    • 561 views
    • 700 replies
    • 272.5k views
  3. How to mount Isco

    • 3 replies
    • 610 views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 25 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 32 replies
    • 11.8k views
    • 9 replies
    • 869 views
    • 11 replies
    • 933 views
    • 32 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 396 views
    • 1 reply
    • 420 views
    • 16 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 540 replies
    • 242.1k views
    • 16 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 1 reply
    • 398 views
    • 31 replies
    • 31.4k views
    • 136 replies
    • 34.1k views
    • 243 replies
    • 132.4k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 6 replies
    • 820 views
    • 6 replies
    • 893 views
  4. The D-Mount project 1 2 3 4

    • 61 replies
    • 31.1k views
    • 64 replies
    • 32k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.2k
    • Total Posts
      350.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,329
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    bradysmith
    Joined
  • Posts

    • A lot of this criticism assumes that value only comes from personally inventing things or never having bad ideas. That’s not how execution works. Ideas are cheap. Execution is what matters. Plenty of people had ideas about reusable rockets, EVs, satellite internet, or brain–computer interfaces long before Musk. What almost no one managed to do was turn those ideas into working, scaled systems in industries where startups usually fail. SpaceX didn’t win because Musk designs fuel tanks. It won because it executed faster and cheaper than legacy aerospace giants with decades of experience. Tesla didn’t invent EVs, but it forced the entire auto industry to electrify years earlier than planned. Starlink is the largest satellite constellation ever deployed, providing connectivity where no real alternative existed. Yes, he has bad ideas. Every aggressive executor does. The difference is that his companies survive them and still outperform competitors. You don’t have to like Musk — but dismissing his role because he isn’t the inventor misses what execution actually means.
    • Easy to fall upwards when you have 498 billion in the bank! What with all that money his personal life is still a binfire. Only have to look at that to see the true character of the man. All the messy multiple affairs and abandoned sons, daughters. That's what he's singularly able to achieve merely as a man when he's not got the billionaire oligarch hat on. When he's got the billions and the companies he's able to take the credit for other people's hard work and that's how he built his entire reputation.
    • There have been numerous stories over the years, apocryphal maybe, but they were coming out even when the media loved Muskrat... anyway, the stories were frequently about how employees of companies like SpaceX believed him to be an absolute idiot and upper management believed that their main role with him was to block him from getting in the way. One of the most famous stories was about some fuel tank that was fracturing in flight.  The engineers had some ideas, but Muskrat came up with some idea to put a layer of fast-set glue/resin on the outside that would stay liquid - and when the cracks started to appear in the tank, the adhesive would leak out and set, automatically healing the crack.  All of the best engineers in the company said that the idea could not possibly work and explained why it couldn't.  Yet, Muskrat insisted on an all hands on deck and everybody worked non-stop with the vessel and the resin until...  Muskrat finally acknowledged that the idea couldn't possibly work. It sort of fits with a man who has basically failed upward for most of his life - such as how he got fired as CEO of PayPal after nearly running the company into bankruptcy with his bad ideas, but still owning a bunch of stock so that when Thiel transformed it to a profitable company and sold it to eBay, Muskrat came out with billions. Would SpaceX exist without him?  No.  Would Starlink exist without SpaceX?  Also no.  Did he invent Starlink?  Also no. Would Neuralink exist without him?  No, and who cares?  It's a good accessibility play for people who can't otherwise operate a computer, but for the rest of us, do you know anybody who is loudly complaining that they don't have some shitty device in their head that will ultimately be used to shovel ads directly into their brain?  Do you spend every day glaring at your computer wishing that your brain could directly control it? For Tesla, he didn't invent it at all.  Outside of having a strong first mover advantage in terms of modern electric cars, they aren't very good.  Quality control has always been lacking.  Muskrat decides that for full self driving, they don't need industry-standard tools like proximity sensors, but instead they'll rely only on cameras.  He did, apparently, invent the truck that looks like a small child drew it and which is almost universally reviled.  So yay. Otherwise, what has Muskrat invented?  Hyperloop - the dumbest mass transit invention in the history of humanity?  12 years later, there isn't a single operating hyperloop that you can go ride.  And it turns out that vactrain concepts had existed for years before he "invented" that too.  So...  has he had a single novel idea in his entire history?  Or is his "genius" really just in ways to exploit existing wealth to extract more money, mostly from the government?
    • I interviewed a university professor recently that said that these AI companies don’t even understand how their own AI’s work. Unlike any other technology in history where all the work it took to create the tech means the creators have a complete understanding of how it works, he says AI is “alien tech” to its makers.  Puts a new perspective on all these tech companies and the markets betting so big on AI… they have little idea what will happen. So glad the entire U.S. economy is propped up by it at the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...