Subforums
-
-
- 27
- posts
17,105 topics in this forum
-
- 524 replies
- 171.5k views
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.4m views
-
- 21 replies
- 5.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 10.6k views
-
- 11 replies
- 284 views
-
- 22 replies
- 603 views
-
- 67 replies
- 6.3k views
-
- 61 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 84 replies
- 6.2k views
-
- 232 replies
- 85.7k views
-
- 5 replies
- 290 views
-
- 18 replies
- 459 views
-
- 18 replies
- 705 views
-
- 12 replies
- 7.5k views
-
- 39 replies
- 4.6k views
-
- 33 replies
- 2k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 11 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 28 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 415 replies
- 64.8k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 32 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 80 replies
- 12.3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 465 views
-
- 63 replies
- 18.5k views
-
- 6 replies
- 692 views
-
- 19 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 16 replies
- 874 views
-
- 10 replies
- 971 views
-
- 7 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 17 replies
- 2k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 249 replies
- 27k views
-
- 12 replies
- 804 views
-
- 7 replies
- 778 views
-
- 46 replies
- 4.4k views
-
- 6 replies
- 982 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 792 views
-
Anyone with a Panasonic S5 II or S9 interested in testing my in-cam ARRI compatible LOG C3 profile? 1 2
- 34 replies
- 6.8k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.1k
-
Total Posts348.2k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Well I think so 😉 I checked out the new Sigma as soon as it was announced but as soon as I saw the size & weight, it was game over vs the full frame 28-70. As I said above though, for the APSC shooter, great and would be superb on a Fuji X or or Sony FX30! -
By fuzzynormal · Posted
I have an outdoor shoot coming up and have been meaning to roll over my ND stuff. Might give it a go. https://shorturl.at/RWJJi https://shorturl.at/TE7qr -
-
Or, instead of forcing my 6k open gate camera into shooting 4k cropped, I can stick with my smaller and lighter Sigma 28-70 f2.8 🤔 Arguably, the new zoom is the equivalent of 1mm wider and 10mm longer in terms of focal range and arguably f1.8 is still f1.8 for light gathering purposes, but for DOF equivalencies, f2.7 = f2.8, but nah, zero real world gains for my needs and a HUGE downgrade from 6k open gate. Now if the lens was significantly smaller and lighter, maybe a small argument could be made, but nah… For APSC users, it’s a different matter and the lens makes sense. Just not for me.
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
"Much larger" is subjective. It's about 15% bigger (it's hard to get a real number since sites like cameradecision which you also used measure height, for example, to the top of the EVF - and Panny Boy's VF protrudes more. And yes, it's about 50% heavier. But when that 50% is a total of like 250g, I kind of shrug. Neither one is going to break your back if you carry it around all day. I'd make that trade-off for much better (but still not great) AF. I also think of my R5 as a very compact/light body and it weighs more than either of them. Years of medium and large format photography may have warped my perception. For a long time, I was doing abandoned buildings with an RB67 which meant jumping fences with it and a heavy tripod (carbon fiber wasn't even remotely affordable yet!) in a backpack. 😅
-
