Subforums
17,127 topics in this forum
-
- 531 replies
- 193.2k views
-
- 27 replies
- 12.8k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.5m views
-
- 2 replies
- 11.7k views
-
- 49 replies
- 7.1k views
-
- 15 replies
- 831 views
-
- 5 replies
- 332 views
-
- 112 replies
- 37.5k views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 680 replies
- 209.3k views
-
- 58 replies
- 13.8k views
-
- 54 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 5 replies
- 469 views
-
- 26 replies
- 6.9k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1k views
-
- 235 replies
- 92.8k views
-
- 4 replies
- 759 views
-
- 74 replies
- 25.8k views
-
- 85 replies
- 32.8k views
-
- 45 replies
- 13.9k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.3k views
-
- 43 replies
- 16.3k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 12 replies
- 5.7k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 14 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 48 replies
- 15.1k views
-
- 23 replies
- 13.2k views
-
- 13 replies
- 16.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 17 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 16 replies
- 3k views
-
- 75 replies
- 20k views
-
- 13 replies
- 6.1k views
-
- 511 replies
- 178k views
-
Anyone with a Panasonic S5 II or S9 interested in testing my in-cam ARRI compatible LOG C3 profile? 1 2
- 35 replies
- 17.2k views
-
- 9 replies
- 2.5k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.1k
-
Total Posts348.8k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Shot a quick test with the Tokina RMC 28-70mm F3.5-4.5 zoom wide open with the wide-angle adapter. Combined with Resolve Film Look Creator it's super super analog, and maybe a bit too analog for what I would find uses for. Still, interesting reference. GH7 shooting C4K Prores 422 >> M42-M43 SB >> Tokina 28-70mm >> cheap wide-angle adapter >> cheap vND Resolve with 1080p timeline: CST to DWG >> exposure / WB >> slight sharpening >> FLC >> export Personally I am not really a fan of the hard-edged bubble-bokeh and the flaring with strong light-sources in frame is too much for most of what I shoot (mostly exterior locations and uncontrolled lighting) but it's great to know that looks with this level of texture are possible. I'm keen to compare it to the setup but without the wide-angle adapter. That would be less degraded but maybe in the right kind of way. -
Imo, you're describing two different strategic approches to AI. Yes, it's important for us to get familiar with it as a tool in our work - but there are also managers/execs, etc looking at AI as a way to cut costs, which includes human labor, at all levels of production. So the only people kind of protected at the moment are ones in unionized jobs... but of course even that is temporary. -
Could you show me some of your a.i. works? IDK if with a.i. it's the same like ordinary filmmakers which make reels... Or could you show me some pro work made with a.i.? -
Sounds good, can you name that specialized AI and the purpose it serves in your workflow? Thanks. -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
There's a lot of "well...." and "it depends" in there. - If you have a manual focus lens with FF gears on it, the R4D is infinitely better, in that it can do it at all (after you buy the focus gear for additional money and spend time calibrating the lens) - If the subject is within between 1.5m and 4m of the camera, the R4D might be better (it's really good here, but I haven't tested the S1R II which might also be very good there) - If there is haze in the air, the S1R II will probably be infinitely better. Haze reflects light which makes lidar throw up its hands and give up - If focusing closer than 1m or so, R4D can get weird because of parallax (the lidar unit sits above the lens - this becomes more relevant the closer you get) - If focusing more than 4-5m away with r4d, the lidar keeps doing alright until about 10m or so and then it just doesn't work at all and calls it infinity. This is fine with wider lenses, but awful with long lenses. That's probably also why the calibration doesn't understand that there are lenses longer than 100mm or so.
-
