Jump to content

17,126 topics in this forum

    • 530 replies
    • 192k views
    • 27 replies
    • 12.4k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 1.5m views
    • 2 replies
    • 11.4k views
    • 1 reply
    • 42 views
    • 5 replies
    • 138 views
    • 674 replies
    • 206.7k views
    • 53 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 26 replies
    • 6.4k views
    • 47 replies
    • 6.4k views
    • 106 replies
    • 36.3k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 9 replies
    • 783 views
    • 235 replies
    • 91.9k views
    • 4 replies
    • 552 views
    • 74 replies
    • 25.1k views
  2. new camera purchase 1 2 3 4 5

    • 85 replies
    • 32.1k views
    • 45 replies
    • 13.2k views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
    • 43 replies
    • 15.8k views
    • 4 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 12 replies
    • 5.4k views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 14 replies
    • 4.8k views
    • 48 replies
    • 14.7k views
    • 23 replies
    • 12.6k views
    • 13 replies
    • 15.3k views
    • 6 replies
    • 4.8k views
    • 17 replies
    • 4.5k views
    • 16 replies
    • 2.8k views
  3. Share our work 1 2 3 4

    • 75 replies
    • 19.7k views
    • 13 replies
    • 5.8k views
    • 511 replies
    • 176.6k views
    • 35 replies
    • 16.9k views
    • 9 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 29 replies
    • 8.4k views
    • 83 replies
    • 28.7k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.4k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.1k
    • Total Posts
      348.8k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,315
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    Farrell
    Joined
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure of the current prices, but I have an old Elmar 35mm f/3.5 which is one of the most gorgeous pieces of glass I've ever seen or used. Also, I have an old Elmar 90mm f/4 collapsible which is pretty gorgeous.  I'd take the 90/2 'cron over it any day, but I'd shed no tears if the 90/4 were the only portrait lens in my bag. Sorry neither one is even remotely adaptable to EF, though!
    • Oh wow. It’s been this price for at least a month now, surprised it’s still up. I was able to take advantage, had a mate grab it for me since I’m not in the UK.
    • I'm exploring the idea of assembling a set of "super slow" vintage primes with an f/stop of f/3.5 or slower for use on short films, personal projects, etc. Why super slow? Because I want the benefits of shooting wide open (circular bokeh & potentially softer image) without throwing the background totally out of focus. Plus, I've been trying to shoot at a deeper depth of field lately because it is a look that I find myself gravitating towards more and more. Plus, slow lenses shouldn't cost much and might even open up the opportunity to work with some real sleepers that no one really cares about these days. Ideally: Focal lengths: ~20mm, 28/35mm, 50/55/58mm, 85/105mm OR a super simple set like 24mm, 50/55mmm, 85/105mm  f/3.5 or slower (preferably all the same f/stop) Same series of lens for consistency Preferred: Old and weird (single-coating, etc.) Adaptable to Canon EF mount Focuses the "right away" (focus scale to the left of infinity) Readily available and under $200/each Does anyone have any recommendations?
    • No additional functionality. I’m not really that bothered about it either currently but I figure for the price of a McDonalds then I might as well get it in case I do want to use it at some point. Also, when the price of this reverts back to £160 then for barely any money I’ve made my S5ii a bit more desirable/slightly more valuable when I come to sell it or part ex it.
    • For the S5ii, unless they slipped something in, no. And if they slipped anything in of slightest interest, they generally say, but I suspect they do sneak in little corrective things they don't wish to tell us about, but then again, probably only with the free firmware stuff?
×
×
  • Create New...