Subforums
16,739 topics in this forum
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.2m views
-
- 1.7k replies
- 359.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 7.2k views
-
- 446 replies
- 35k views
-
- 7 replies
- 155 views
-
- 28 replies
- 803 views
-
- 474 replies
- 126.8k views
-
- 35 replies
- 978 views
-
- 1.1k replies
- 130.9k views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 145 views
-
- 5 replies
- 343 views
-
- 2 replies
- 339 views
-
- 3 replies
- 551 views
-
- 7 replies
- 413 views
-
- 14 replies
- 752 views
-
- 1 reply
- 338 views
-
- 55 replies
- 6.1k views
-
- 103 replies
- 12.5k views
-
- 127 replies
- 5k views
-
- 15 replies
- 779 views
-
- 8 replies
- 710 views
-
- 4 replies
- 517 views
-
- 14 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 25 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 8 replies
- 726 views
-
- 331 replies
- 77.1k views
-
- 55 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 13 replies
- 733 views
-
- 41 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 39 replies
- 16.4k views
-
- 39 replies
- 7.5k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 833 views
-
- 235 replies
- 18.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 509 views
-
- 17 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 30 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 18 replies
- 2.6k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics16.7k
-
Total Posts338k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
there is a cost effect ratio here too. other than magic lantern cameras, uncompressed raw cameras are extremely expensive, like the Alexa family. on the other hand, a 60p camera with a low end codec can be very cheap. doing action packed shots, the latter one will be more suitable. try a 24p thin codec camera, you can hardly see clearly anything once the camera is panning, tilting, or doing other complexing movements. -
Here is an answer from a pro colorist / editor. It will give you a perspective and a cool tip how to edit any footage on a not very powerful computer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olvTKnLJCJc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTes9KkwmME According to another of his videos, 12K BRAW is so well optimized that it can play without a problem on a Macbook Pro 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ShXVTiGD80 -
It would be great to be able to give a straight answer, but there are too many variables. Even something like the SSD option of the Mac model chosen might mean that it can or cannot do something. Going to Resolve, there are literally dozens of variables involved. Even if it's just 12K footage on a 4K timeline with a LUT - will Resolve be using Linear or Tetrahedral interpolation for the LUT? This matters as it's extra processing power required, etc. -
True. I think the point is to exactly realise what such difference actually means... in resolution numbers, as for instance : ) What one allows and the other one instead :- ) -
Sure, but crucial for what? If it's the difference between being able to play realtime with a LUT for editing purposes or not then it's probably a critical amount, but that will depend on the timeline resolution. If you want to colour grade then some things need to be done at full timeline resolution and some things don't. Grading in front of clients is a specific need that some have and some don't have. If you're only grading with simple adjustments then that is very very different to doing intensive tasks like NR or any of the AI things. So, "critical" really depends on the application. For typing on these forums, I'd say no, but everything else is a question mark....
-
