Subforums
16,739 topics in this forum
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.2m views
-
- 1.7k replies
- 359.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 7.2k views
-
- 8 replies
- 174 views
-
- 446 replies
- 35k views
-
- 28 replies
- 815 views
-
- 474 replies
- 126.8k views
-
- 35 replies
- 987 views
-
- 1.1k replies
- 130.9k views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 147 views
-
- 5 replies
- 346 views
-
- 2 replies
- 342 views
-
- 3 replies
- 552 views
-
- 7 replies
- 414 views
-
- 14 replies
- 764 views
-
- 1 reply
- 340 views
-
- 55 replies
- 6.1k views
-
- 103 replies
- 12.5k views
-
- 127 replies
- 5k views
-
- 15 replies
- 810 views
-
- 8 replies
- 712 views
-
- 4 replies
- 526 views
-
- 14 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 25 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 8 replies
- 734 views
-
- 331 replies
- 77.1k views
-
- 55 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 13 replies
- 735 views
-
- 41 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 39 replies
- 16.4k views
-
- 39 replies
- 7.5k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 834 views
-
- 235 replies
- 18.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 510 views
-
- 17 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 30 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 18 replies
- 2.6k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics16.7k
-
Total Posts338k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
The above is exactly why I say there are asterisks and "it depends" in the answer. Will either computer be able to play back 12K braw in Resolve without dropping frames? As long as the storage is fast enough, absolutely. Will it be able to play back in Premiere without dropping frames? 🤷♂️ FCP? 🤷♂️ As I said before, my M2 Max (the weaker version) w/ 64GB is just able to play back 8K raw from my R5 in Resolve. If I put on a grade where I tweak a few raw options, add FilmConvert Nitrate, and tweak some curves/color warper stuff afterward, I still get 23.98 on it as long as I'm not doing anything else in the background. Canon raw is a nightmare codec in terms of performance. Braw is easier. One other thing to consider is that I'm sure that the local Apple store (if there is one) has some M3 Max models on the showroom floor. If you're nice about it, they might be willing to at least put FCP on one (or let you download Resolve) to load a sample project file and some footage. Since the UM12K has been out for a long time, I'm sure some nice reviewer/youtuber has put some raw files online for you to download. You could just give it a try with one of your sample grades to understand if it performs as needed. -
there is a cost effect ratio here too. other than magic lantern cameras, uncompressed raw cameras are extremely expensive, like the Alexa family. on the other hand, a 60p camera with a low end codec can be very cheap. doing action packed shots, the latter one will be more suitable. try a 24p thin codec camera, you can hardly see clearly anything once the camera is panning, tilting, or doing other complexing movements. -
Here is an answer from a pro colorist / editor. It will give you a perspective and a cool tip how to edit any footage on a not very powerful computer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olvTKnLJCJc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTes9KkwmME According to another of his videos, 12K BRAW is so well optimized that it can play without a problem on a Macbook Pro 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ShXVTiGD80 -
It would be great to be able to give a straight answer, but there are too many variables. Even something like the SSD option of the Mac model chosen might mean that it can or cannot do something. Going to Resolve, there are literally dozens of variables involved. Even if it's just 12K footage on a 4K timeline with a LUT - will Resolve be using Linear or Tetrahedral interpolation for the LUT? This matters as it's extra processing power required, etc. -
True. I think the point is to exactly realise what such difference actually means... in resolution numbers, as for instance : ) What one allows and the other one instead :- )
-
