Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,130 visits to this link)
-
- 57
- posts
17,180 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 121 views
-
- 31 replies
- 29.3k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.7m views
-
- 0 replies
- 52 views
-
- 0 replies
- 41 views
-
- 700 replies
- 271.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 103 views
-
- 3 replies
- 381 views
-
- 31 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 450 replies
- 100.8k views
-
- 11 replies
- 952 views
-
- 0 replies
- 124 views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 32 replies
- 11.3k views
-
- 9 replies
- 675 views
-
- 0 replies
- 138 views
-
- 11 replies
- 608 views
-
- 32 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 2 replies
- 300 views
-
- 0 replies
- 194 views
-
- 1 reply
- 226 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 540 replies
- 240k views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 203 views
-
- 136 replies
- 33.3k views
-
- 243 replies
- 132k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 618 views
-
- 6 replies
- 710 views
-
- 61 replies
- 30.7k views
-
- 64 replies
- 31.7k views
-
- 14 replies
- 9.3k views
-
- 5 replies
- 508 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 22 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 29 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 111 replies
- 50.3k views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts350.3k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Just came across this written by a dp in 2010: "The film was shot in 720p, mostly using an AJA I/O HD box and recording to a HD in Apple ProRes HQ, though a bit was recorded to tape and a few scenes (mostly in cars) were shot with an HPX170. The camera was set to FilmRec mode and we used the lowest setting that could capture the needed dynamic range of the scene. This was usually Dynamic Level 200%, but higher when necessary. This meant that the uncorrected movie looks a little bit low in contrast and saturation so the Quicktime player was set to slightly increase contrast and saturation. I was a little bit nervous that the 720p image on such a large screen might look a little soft, but it looked amazing! Going next door to glimpse a big Hollywood 35mm print revealed that the 720p digital projection looked as detailed as the 35mm print, and much cleaner and steadier of course. The Varicam projected had much more "life" than the dull 2k DI film print in the next theater (I'm talking about basic image quality, not the cinematography 🙂 )" -
Just came across this written by a dp in 2010: "The film was shot in 720p, mostly using an AJA I/O HD box and recording to a HD in Apple ProRes HQ, though a bit was recorded to tape and a few scenes (mostly in cars) were shot with an HPX170. The camera was set to FilmRec mode and we used the lowest setting that could capture the needed dynamic range of the scene. This was usually Dynamic Level 200%, but higher when necessary. This meant that the uncorrected movie looks a little bit low in contrast and saturation so the Quicktime player was set to slightly increase contrast and saturation. I was a little bit nervous that the 720p image on such a large screen might look a little soft, but it looked amazing! Going next door to glimpse a big Hollywood 35mm print revealed that the 720p digital projection looked as detailed as the 35mm print, and much cleaner and steadier of course. The Varicam projected had much more "life" than the dull 2k DI film print in the next theater (I'm talking about basic image quality, not the cinematography 🙂 )"
-
Commenting underneath “articles” that have blatantly been “inspired” by discussions here citing the original wouldn’t go amiss either. -
Here is some completely unbiased coverage of Scotland’s previous meetings with Brazil.
-
By Andrew Reid · Posted
My opinion on the buyout of Hollywood by an oligarchy mafia. https://www.eoshd.com/opinion/warner-bros-risk-talent-exodus-over-trump-ellison-deal-who-will-follow-christopher-nolan-and-jump-ship-next/
-
