Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,429 visits to this link)
17,205 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.4m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 407k views
-
- 0 replies
- 466 views
-
- 700 replies
- 277.3k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.7m views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 688.7k views
-
- 543 replies
- 244.1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 294 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 246 views
-
- 78 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 514 views
-
- 5 replies
- 209 views
-
- 20 replies
- 636 views
-
- 66 replies
- 32.6k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 114 replies
- 52.5k views
-
- 8 replies
- 495 views
-
- 462 replies
- 108.3k views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 3 replies
- 830 views
-
- 16 replies
- 760 views
-
- 63 replies
- 32.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 607 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 10 replies
- 768 views
-
- 8 replies
- 571 views
-
- 3 replies
- 420 views
-
- 12 replies
- 789 views
-
- 0 replies
- 303 views
-
- 15 replies
- 8.4k views
-
- 103 replies
- 52.4k views
-
- 7 replies
- 483 views
-
- 6 replies
- 866 views
-
- 2 replies
- 494 views
-
- 5 replies
- 913 views
-
- 0 replies
- 320 views
-
- 20 replies
- 7.7k views
-
- 22 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 387 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts350.6k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By Eric Matyas · Posted
Hi Everyone, What a year...ugh. In these troubling times, I thought I'd finish out the year with a music track that maybe offers a little bit of hope: "THE MEADOW WE CALL HOME" (looping) You can listen to it here: https://soundimage.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/The-Meadow-We-Call-Home.ogg And download it here: https://soundimage.org/fantasy-13/ Have a safe New Years Eve. -
By Andrew - EOSHD · Posted
Once they brought the price down it made so much more sense to me, $2k region was always asking just a tad too much for a Micro Four Thirds camera, at least that was the perception. But this now has the specs of a $6k camera, only it's a Micro Four Thirds size sensor. So even at $2k it's a good deal. At nearly half that it's a total must-have. In the old days, the smaller sensor lacked dynamic range, low light performance and decent autofocus. This is just not the issue it used to be, gap has closed up. -
By BlueBomberTurbo · Posted
So in the end, I went with an R6 III. 🤷♂️ How did I end up here, you may ask. I originally wanted R7 and R8, but had a hard time reconciling their limitations (R7 = slow readout, crazy 4K60 crop, AF issues, shutter issues; R8 = no IBIS, tiny battery). So I was still stuck without a "hero" camera. Something I could use for handheld video in most situations, and for photo on the same job if needed. I decided to get an R6 II, due to the holiday discounts that I hadn't anticipated earlier, to get past all limitations. Though now, I'd need to get a Ninja V+ to get the highest quality out of it ($500ish used), but I was OK with that. And then I got a deal I couldn't refuse on a new R6 III, which would end up costing the same as the R6 II/V+ combo, while exceeding even their limitations. Grabbed a 28-70/2.8 STM and Godox V480C while I was at it. Everything arrived at the very last second, and I was able to use the combo for the Xmas Eve job I had lined up that same night (nightclub photo/video). Photo AF was about on par with my A9 in extreme low light (good but not amazing). Got hung up on too many unintended faces, so I turned off subject detection. Video AF was definitely better than photo (no noticeable wandering/searching), probably because it moves slower. Lighting was super dark, so I was at ISO 25,600 4K24 video/6400 photo + flash, but the video quality held up thanks to the second base ISO being close. Added Canon's own CMT LUT and some Topaz NR, and the video was good to go! Vs my old OM-1, it's not even a contest. R6 III feels like a decade newer. Even the IBIS is MUCH smoother with more natural movement, despite everyone constantly blanket-praising m4/3 IBIS. It's hard to make it look bad if you move somewhat deliberately (slow walking through a crowd), while OM-1 would twitch at random, no matter how smooth you were, even with plain old panning. And OM-1 would randomly lose video focus in much brighter situations than that night, no matter how large the focus box was. R6 III stayed in place through some absolute hell situations (nightclub strobes), though photo AF completely choked at that point. Wondering if it was the 1/8 mist filter causing AF issues (no noticeable flaring), but it doesn't matter. I got all the shots I needed, the client was happy with the output, and the R6 III roughly worked as expected. -
By zerocool22 · Posted
Well for me it is taking me out of the film right away. I feel there is something off in each shot. ( color, dof, detail, dynamic range, bad lighting,...) So for each their own I guess, but this is not for me. As I am constantly wondering why each shot looks off and that is keeping me off the story.. (not sure if people with no film experience can spot it, I think they can). But just my 2 cents. The only film I ever saw that kinda worked that way was "the blair witch project" but they tell you in the first minute. This is the footage of some students that went missing in the woods" so I could give it an place. -
In one interview the director spoke about a black forest diffusion filter. The key factor is that they really wanted to go unnoticed. On the first day of filming, they had to abort because the crew showed up all dressed in black; everyone realized they were doing something and a crowd gathered to see what was happening. They sent everyone home and the next day they forced everyone to wear normal clothes and disperse once their tasks were finished. The group following the actors consisted of only 4 or 5 people.
-
