Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,336 visits to this link)
17,185 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 37 views
-
- 28 replies
- 906 views
-
- 10 replies
- 361 views
-
- 0 replies
- 20 views
-
- 458 replies
- 102.9k views
-
- 32 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 12 replies
- 543 views
-
- 102 replies
- 51.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 131 views
-
- 19 replies
- 7.1k views
-
- 13 replies
- 248 views
-
- 4 replies
- 328 views
-
- 3 replies
- 242 views
-
- 5 replies
- 715 views
-
- 1 reply
- 500 views
-
- 19 replies
- 550 views
-
- 700 replies
- 272.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 597 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 25 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 32 replies
- 11.7k views
-
- 9 replies
- 862 views
-
- 11 replies
- 917 views
-
- 32 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 391 views
-
- 1 reply
- 414 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 540 replies
- 242.1k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 393 views
-
- 31 replies
- 31.4k views
-
- 136 replies
- 34.1k views
-
- 243 replies
- 132.4k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 812 views
-
- 6 replies
- 885 views
-
- 61 replies
- 31.1k views
-
- 64 replies
- 32k views
-
- 14 replies
- 9.6k views
-
- 5 replies
- 698 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts350.3k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By Andrew Reid · Posted
Some thoughts from film industry workers in Hollywood: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8dyy47qy82o They can't decide whether a streaming company or right wing oligarch is the solution. I suppose it's a bit like trying to choose between Epstein and Jimmy Saville because the usual babysitter isn't available and the restaurant was booked in advance 3 weeks ago. You'll notice that not many of the people in the article still have a house. Even fewer want to be identified, presumably because they value the roof over their heads more than fame. Although I feel sorry for them, I am coming to terms with the thought that maybe a bit of a reset for cinema is what's needed. Not just because most of what's being made nowadays is complete shite anyway, but that theatre going can be removed, extracted, saved from the general public who have the combined IQ of 1000 PE teachers. Then real cinema-lovers can go in peace, to our smaller niche cinemas and watch actually good movies with emotional depth in them and substance. Leaving the Homer Simpsons of the world to stay on the sofa watching League of legends: the movie on their fucking phone with one hand and wanking to AI porn with the other. Wait. Did I just describe the average American? -
By Andrew Reid · Posted
I don't remember Bill Clinton's government combing through a non-US citizen's personal politics at customs. It makes tourism a bit shit, doesn't it? If I had to go to NAB or to the US for work I would just not bother. Really I didnt know that It was him was it? Have you ever considered it might instead be the thousands of employees of these companies backed by billions in venture capitalist funds and government NASA contracts. Also as far as "the world" and "the future" goes, they haven't moved the needle that far. SpaceX is just a private NASA contractor and they haven't even gone to the moon. Tesla is a failing car company, completely outgunned by China. Starlink consists of some satellites that ruin photos of the sky. And Neural link is an allegedly deeply immoral pig experiment. No. Critical thinking, and criticism is not the issue. Gullible bastards are. -
By zerocool22 · Posted
Well honestly I am not sure the old style of politics was even better. Before social media, there was TV and newspapers (there still is). And the story was very onesided. Allthough they claim to be impartial, they were/are def not. And classic media was more easy to control. (yet also easy to pay ads for social media..) For example, I read an article about Elon Musk gets 96% more negative media coverage (not sure who wrote it or funded the research, but in my experience it def feels true). The man is a wacko, sure, but he is def the n1 executing entrepreneur who pushing the world towards the future. (spacex, tesla, starlink, x, neuralink, ...) The media criticizes every step he does and reposts it daily. Yet he saves 2 astronauts, and its almost crickets everywhere unless you are looking for that specific news. Offcourse bashing/hatefull posts get more attention over positive news, and that might also have an big part of the (human) problem. -
By Andrew Reid · Posted
Was it all a bit of a sham? EOSHD investigates... https://www.eoshd.com/news/users-are-complaining-openai-wreaked-sora-2-eoshd-takes-a-look-at-what-happened/ -
By Ilkka Nissila · Posted
I believe it's just mainstream social media sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, LinkedIn etc., that they care about, not small niche forums on very specific topics not related to politics. I think it's safe to visit the US unless you have a written record of publicly speaking against Trump or his policies, in which case it might not currently be safe.
-
