Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,780 visits to this link)
17,224 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.5m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 432.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 968 views
-
- 700 replies
- 289.1k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 717.8k views
-
- 21 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 2 replies
- 269 views
-
- 95 replies
- 37.3k views
-
- 12 replies
- 9.4k views
-
- 8 replies
- 608 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 551 replies
- 249.2k views
-
- 45 replies
- 15.8k views
-
- 36 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 64 replies
- 34.9k views
-
- 468 replies
- 125.1k views
-
- 11 replies
- 6.7k views
-
- 48 replies
- 12k views
-
- 0 replies
- 335 views
-
- 0 replies
- 384 views
-
- 0 replies
- 257 views
-
- 28 replies
- 4.4k views
-
- 85 replies
- 8.5k views
-
- 29 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 354 views
-
- 3 replies
- 730 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 57 replies
- 6k views
-
- 67 replies
- 35k views
-
- 87 replies
- 64.4k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 797 views
-
- 9 replies
- 977 views
-
- 1 reply
- 609 views
-
- 5 replies
- 6.8k views
-
- 55 replies
- 28.1k views
-
- 34 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 75 replies
- 51.5k views
-
- 3 replies
- 725 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts351k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
This. Every review for the past decade has talked about firmware updates "hopefully the brand will do this of fix that". They never do. I'm in the Nikon ecosystem so I'm tempted to sell my xh2s for the ZR, but it's more of a sideways move. I'd lose open gate, and fuji has a great image. But the Fuji isn't reliable, especially with AF. -
Agree this is a waste of time. They should say "a cinema camera is coming" or "the S1ii is our cinema camera". Either would help a lot of consumers decide what their next move is. -
By Ilkka Nissila · Posted
On the cined web site, there is a text version summarizing the interview - much less time-consuming to digest. -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
These days, my travel setup looks a bit different, but with a similar goal of traveling light. I just bring the GFX 100 II and for lenses, the EF 35/1.4L II and the Fujinon 110/2. I used to bring the Fujinon 32-64/4 instead, but then I needed to bring something for lower light/night shooting. Plus a 2x zoom makes less sense when I can just crop anyway. I was looking at the GFX 100RF, but it's really not all that small and when I realized I was willing to accept a fixed 35 with that, I decided to just do the same thing, but, y'know, fast. For video, the GFX also makes it more like I have 4 lenses instead of 2. I can record in 4K or 5.8K at full sensor width - so effectively a 28mm or 80mm lens in FF terms - but if I switch to 8K, the crop is close to FF so I also have a 35 and 110mm lenses - with plenty of resolution to crop in if I want to. The fact that it's 8K is less interesting than it being a bit cropped. 😅 I don't really need to get all that wide so the 35 is usually enough, even if I crop in a little when IBIS darkens the corners a little. For photos, there's enough room to crop in that I can get reasonable results going anywhere from around 27-28mm on full frame to... something like 200-300mm after cropping. For ND filters, I just bring a set of Kase clip-in filters - ND8, ND64, and ND1000. The entire set fits in a tiny little box and weighs almost nothing. For a tripod, I... don't. The IBIS in the GFX is decent enough that I can get sharp photos handheld as long there's at least some light (if it's too dim for around 1/15second at f/1.4 at ISO 6400, that's rough - but it's just not a scenario I'm optimizing for these days). Limitations? Longer exposures for waterfalls are hit and miss. I usually just turn on the 2s timer at about a 1 second exposure and shoot it like 5 times and if I don't get something that's sharp with smooth water, I decide that wasn't meant to be. I have a lot of pictures of waterfalls already (I really like waterfalls). The camera and lenses are obtrusive - the GFX 100 II is smaller than my GFX 100 was and that's nice, but it's still not small. Rolling shutter in some modes is enough to be noticeable even with relatively small movement. The fact that it's obtrusive can be a really big problem - in a lot of cities, it's not a camera to casually hang around the neck and stroll around. I'm in Sao Paulo right now - there are only a few parts of the city where I'd even bring it out. BUT the good news is that my phone (iPhone 16 Pro) works absolutely fine in all of the places where I wouldn't take out my big obtrusive camera. The iPhone is good enough that I take out the big camera less and less, even when it would be totally safe to take it out. -
By John Matthews · Posted
My take: Panasonic’s Head of Imaging practices a rare art: saying almost nothing with exceptional stamina. The translator deserve a standing ovation for turning sprawling verbal marathons into neat, meaningful summaries. I read each phrase 3 times before moving on to the next.
-
