Subforums
17,124 topics in this forum
-
- 530 replies
- 191.7k views
-
- 27 replies
- 12.4k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.5m views
-
- 2 replies
- 11.4k views
-
- 53 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 26 replies
- 6.2k views
-
- 47 replies
- 6.3k views
-
- 106 replies
- 36.1k views
-
- 673 replies
- 206.1k views
-
- 11 replies
- 963 views
-
- 9 replies
- 739 views
-
- 235 replies
- 91.9k views
-
- 4 replies
- 511 views
-
- 74 replies
- 25k views
-
- 85 replies
- 32.1k views
-
- 45 replies
- 13.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1k views
-
- 43 replies
- 15.7k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 12 replies
- 5.3k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 14 replies
- 4.8k views
-
- 48 replies
- 14.5k views
-
- 23 replies
- 12.5k views
-
- 13 replies
- 15.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 17 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 75 replies
- 19.7k views
-
- 13 replies
- 5.7k views
-
- 511 replies
- 176.2k views
-
Anyone with a Panasonic S5 II or S9 interested in testing my in-cam ARRI compatible LOG C3 profile? 1 2
- 35 replies
- 16.8k views
-
- 9 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 29 replies
- 8.3k views
-
- 83 replies
- 28.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-
- 8 replies
- 4.8k views
-
- 8 replies
- 3.6k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.1k
-
Total Posts348.8k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
I don't really use the audio for dialogue so can't really comment on it specifically. To zoom out and think more holistically about sound, and also a bit about getting in front of the camera, there are a few approaches. High-quality sound on location. This is great but you pay for it in terms of paying for extra equipment, extra faff of charging it, setting it up, using it, cleaning and maintaining it, etc. High-quality in-camera audio is the most convenient and the most expensive to get. External audio makes it easier / cheaper but creates extra work to keep the audio files managed and to sync them in post. Acceptable sound on location. This could be through a combination of average in-camera audio and average external audio. The in-camera audio could potentially using on-camera mics like the Rode VideoMicro or a plugin Lav mic that don't require any power and are plug-and-forget but are dependent on the quality of preamps in the camera. The external audio could be as simple as using a smartphone right next to your mouth, or using the integrated mic in the headphones as a short lav mic. I've seen lots of vloggers do this in very noisy environments and it works fine. First example, second example. Record in post. ADR (Automated Dialogue Replacement) is where actors re-record their dialogue in post production to match their lips in the footage. It is so common that many films simply didn't bother to get good sound and created the audio (dialogue, sound effects, sound design, the lot) in post after the fact. I've done this before on short films and if you take a bit or time to do it then you can get results indistinguishable from doing it on-location. Recording in post also comes into the idea of appearing on screen, or not. By taking lots of notes and recording your thoughts during the trip (potentially just using voice memos on your phone at the end of each day) you can then narrate the finished film and have a significant presence in the finished edit, have high quality audio, and also take away the burden of getting great audio for everything that happens throughout the whole trip. Narrating the film will also enable you to communicate ideas and feelings and information in a concise way with carefully chosen words, rather than trying to piece together a coherent summary from fragmented snippets of footage. Narrating the final piece also takes a huge burden off the footage too, because anything you didn't capture can be explained in V/O so the film doesn't rest solely on the footage to be self-explanatory, which is a high-bar to achieve. There's a hidden mindset that you're at the cutting edge of (and being cut by), which is that the entire film-making industry assumes that anyone wanting high-quality equipment doesn't mind it being large, and that if you care about size then you don't care about quality. I've gone round and round with people online and it's like "small and good" is a combination that somehow doesn't exist in their world-view. This has lessened over recent years, but is still the elephant in the room. Speaking of the elephant in the room, be careful not to lose sight of the final prize, which is an engaging final product. I don't know how much editing experience you have, but making a doc is like making a bunch of lego pieces without knowing what you're eventually going to want to make, then designing the building, and then trying to assemble the building out of the lego blocks you have made. Obviously those with a lot of skill will be able to anticipate the final result better, and will make better pieces, but to a certain extent the more pieces you make and the more variety you include, the easier it will be to assemble the finished product you want. This is why I advocate for setups that: 1) you will use (giving you more footage) 2) is fast to use (giving you more footage of things that happen quickly) 3) is flexible (giving you more variety of footage) 4) is enjoyable to use (making you more likely to use it and also making the whole thing more enjoyable and more likely to be successful overall). Remember, this person is ready for anything, but misses almost everything switching equipment, and has a hernia by the end... You should start with the idea of just using your phone and only add equipment that will make the end result better, not worse. -
Might/probably is a different result with Sony? But yes, I need to try Andrew’s LUT as soon as I can but mid season very difficult as it will take some work as I bake in my LUT so will need to bake in a second conversion LUT also and well, not got the time to play with that and thoroughly test at this time. But I will! -
I actually mean Andrew’s profile. I downloaded it so have a copy. I didn’t love the Phantom LUT; used neutral on my friend’s FX3 footage. IDK, he wants a very clean white grade which is great, but the skin tends to lean heavy magenta which I need to correct for. My personal work is a lot more stylized so maybe it would look better in that context. -
If you mean the Phantom LUT, I’d suggest Neutral. Utopia is next ‘best’ but I prefer the Neutral so I can then do my own mild creative grade over the top whereas the others are more a look. I tried the official Arri Log C3 my S1Rii came with but can’t get it to look as good as the Phantom SOOC even before any twiddling, but maybe that is just me…
-
I’ll have to give this a try on my S9 for an upcoming shoot! Will let you know my thoughts.
-
