Jump to content

17,110 topics in this forum

  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 288

    • 5.7k replies
    • 1.4m views
    • 525 replies
    • 174.4k views
    • 21 replies
    • 5.7k views
    • 1 reply
    • 10.7k views
    • 83 replies
    • 8.1k views
    • 27 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 22 replies
    • 4.1k views
  2. Share our work 1 2 3 4

    • 67 replies
    • 15.3k views
    • 33 replies
    • 984 views
    • 1 reply
    • 131 views
    • 234 replies
    • 86.3k views
    • 8 replies
    • 3.7k views
    • 8 replies
    • 819 views
    • 41 replies
    • 5.4k views
    • 429 replies
    • 123.8k views
  3. Sony FX2 1 2 3 4 5

    • 88 replies
    • 8.6k views
    • 723 replies
    • 222.5k views
    • 4 replies
    • 383 views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 1 reply
    • 346 views
    • 12 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 11 replies
    • 656 views
    • 22 replies
    • 1k views
    • 61 replies
    • 4.8k views
    • 18 replies
    • 759 views
    • 12 replies
    • 8.5k views
    • 33 replies
    • 4.7k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 11 replies
    • 2.7k views
    • 28 replies
    • 2.1k views
  4. Panasonic G9 mk2 1 2 3 4 21

    • 415 replies
    • 66.7k views
    • 18 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 32 replies
    • 2.7k views
  5. new camera purchase 1 2 3 4 5

    • 80 replies
    • 13.1k views
    • 3 replies
    • 661 views
    • 63 replies
    • 19.1k views
    • 6 replies
    • 896 views
    • 16 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 7 replies
    • 4.9k views
    • 17 replies
    • 2.6k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.1k
    • Total Posts
      348.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,313
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    Farrell
    Joined
  • Posts

    • A second camera with a wider angle lens (or zoom) isn't a bad idea.  I'm afraid a second GF body is probably not going to be in the budget for me, but a second small camera or film camera isn't out of the question!  I'll hope that the elephant doesn't ram us too much, though - we're likely to rent a truck with a rooftop tent or some other form of camper or van.  It would stink to have our home get crushed. I may also bring my older Canon EF 100-400 - but carry-on space is limited! Definitely true about heat waves getting to be a problem eventually - and while they weren't a big deal here yesterday near sundown at about 24C, they're likely to be more of a thing in Namibia in September at 34C. That is definitely true.  I have an old Telyt-R 560mm ... maybe an f/5.6(?) around here somewhere (got it at a garage sale, of all things).  The biggest problem that I have with it, and by extension other vintage extreme telephotos, is that aside from the lens IS, things seem to have loosened up a bit and every time there's a slight breeze or I even look at it, it vibrates for about 20 seconds.  Might be better on the GH5?  
    • That's a hell of a lens! I have a Tokina 400mm F5.6 permanently on my GH5 now to act as a telescope because I looked into buying one and it was cheaper and more fun to buy a super-telephoto lens!  It's not super-sharp wide open but in daylight you can just stop down, plus anything that is quite far away suffers from heat haze anyway, so the sharpness of the air is the limiting factor. I've thought about going on safari for years but have never actually gone.  My thinking eventually lead me to the idea of having two bodies, one with a very long lens on it, and the other one with a very shot zoom on it so you can get shots of when the monkeys start stealing food out of your van, or the elephants ram you.  My impression from social media is that these things are practically guaranteed to happen. I have the PanaLeica 100-400mm on my "when I'm a millionaire" list as it seems it would be perfect for things like a safari where you never know how far away the subjects are going to be.
    • Ouch!! My GH7 (with battery, card, 14-140mm, and vND) is just over 1.1kg.  The 12-100mm is just a hair under 300g heavier, so the GH7 + 12-100mm combo would actually be a hair above 1.4kg by the time it's fully functional, and my setup doesn't even include any audio equipment, so that's also something to take into consideration. I walked around Pompeii carrying the GH5 + Voigtlander 17.5mm + Rode Videomic Pro (1.4kg) in my hand for several hours, raising it up when I saw something I wanted to shoot.  My wrist was sore for several days afterwards, just from having the weight on it for that long.  It might be something you'd get used to, but having to train so you have the strength and stamina to carry a camera around seems a bit much to me! I agree.  The high-ISO performance is actually quite impressive too.  For low-light I have the 9mm F1.7 with CrZ and if I want longer range than that I have the 12-35mm F2.8.  Probably the only other lens I would get for super-low-light shooting is the PanaLeica 15mm F1.7 because it's small and fast and being a Leica lens should be nice and sharp wide-open so the CrZ mode should be quite usable with it.
    • I own and use both. The Oly 12-100mm F4 is a great lens, but it's much bigger and heavier than the Pana 14-140mm (560g versus 265g) - both on an OM-1: On an E-M1 ii/iii or OM-1 the 12-100mm supports Sync-IS which gives sublime video IS performance, but even with the relatively light (for that kind of camera) OM-1, the combo is 1.2 kg and somewhat front-heavy if you're using it handheld. A GH7 + 12-100mm would be nearly 1.4 kg. As a 'travel' lens, IMHO the combination of low weight and focal length range makes the 14-140mm almost perfect (other than in really low light, of course).
    • But, imo, you/me/we are only capable of looking at this from our particular idea of art and what it means for art to have a soul. The next couple generations of kids will have different reference points for that same idea/measurement. This is why the big corps pushing AI don't care how we feel about it - bcuz they're looking at the long game. So they understand that we are not their target audience (bcuz we'll be dead, lol). Their target audiences are the generations coming up who will be born into a world where AI, etc is just the norm. So you're absolutely right that there will still be people who value art that has a soul - but again, what will prob be different is the criteria they use to decide what art with a soul looks/feels like. It will be different - but just as essential to their existence as it has always been throughout human history.  There is no technological advancement that will ever result in humans losing their desire to make/consume art with soul. What can and is happening is that we are losing our ability to monetize/exploit/make a living off art with soul on a large commercial scale. But that really only matters bcuz we currently live/work/exist within a capitalist system that is exploitative by design. 
×
×
  • Create New...