Subforums
17,091 topics in this forum
-
- 519 replies
- 164k views
-
- 20 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.4m views
-
- 1 reply
- 10.3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 446 views
-
- 224 replies
- 10k views
-
- 37 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 10 replies
- 714 views
-
- 5 replies
- 163 views
-
- 5 replies
- 242 views
-
- 8 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 5 replies
- 136 views
-
- 10 replies
- 446 views
-
- 6 replies
- 285 views
-
- 73 replies
- 8.4k views
-
Anyone with a Panasonic S5 II or S9 interested in testing my in-cam ARRI compatible LOG C3 profile? 1 2
- 34 replies
- 5.8k views
-
- 21 replies
- 741 views
-
- 56 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 23 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 5 replies
- 529 views
-
- 5 replies
- 401 views
-
- 13 replies
- 575 views
-
- 0 replies
- 321 views
-
- 29 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 35 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 14 replies
- 873 views
-
- 36 replies
- 11.7k views
-
- 228 replies
- 84.2k views
-
- 118 replies
- 23.2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 25 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.9k views
-
Grant Petty on the future of DaVinci Resolve Studio pricing: "We'll probably eventually charge some kind of upgrade for this." 1 2
- 22 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 757 replies
- 166.7k views
-
- 3 replies
- 683 views
-
- 7 replies
- 608 views
-
- 36 replies
- 6.9k views
-
- 8 replies
- 854 views
-
- 0 replies
- 504 views
-
- 23 replies
- 5.4k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.1k
-
Total Posts347.7k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Where are these from? Nikonrumors didn't post these? I'd like to see 14bit readout too though. This is also a comment from Phil Holland, which isn't too different: "If I was a guessing man, I think the efforts of RED and Nikon could lead to a smaller sized FX3-ish sort of Komodo, probably a model with in body stabilization to appease the crowd. But perhaps sticking to a more useful Komodo-X body type with a focus on trimming some length and weight. Maybe getting it down to 2lbs again. Perhaps with a flip up top LCD that folds down and rotates for protection with a decent latch so you can still use it for things Komodo really does well." Personally I'd really like to see open gate, and ND's. -
@MrSMWYeah I agree, I pre-ordered the S1 right as it came out, did the same thing with the S5iiX, have shot them together on pretty much every job since, across a huge variety of use cases, never seen any kind of real, noticeable difference between them, at all. Ditto with the original S5, which I have also had with those other two cams on many dozens if not hundreds of shoots over the past several years. I think people just always find something to complain about. Especially when it comes to super arbitrary, impossible-to-prove image-quality mumbo jumbo, i.e. "motion cadence," "video look," "micro-contrast" or "3D-Pop," etc. -
By Caleb Genheimer · Posted
The elephant in the room for all us sensor nerds is gonna be that Pyxis 12K for the next ~5yrs when looking at flagship mirrorless, and anyone building cameras with sensors from Sony just got undercut by BMD’s RGBW. I expect to see some sort of answer in under two years, and it’ll probably come from Sony putting something new silicone in their own lineup first, but let’s be honest here. I could upgrade from my (still excellent BTW) S1H to this new LUMIX, and get, what? A bit better AF, a bit more frame rate, and a pick-your-poison of either improved DR or improved readout depending on the mode. Or… I pay a bit more and get the Pyxis 12K. Or (and I’m betting on this option,) I wait ~80 weeks, and whaddayaknow?! BMD has either dropped the 12K’s price, or they come out with something new and people sell the 12K at a discount in response. There’s no way a BMD camera holds at launch price past 24 months, it simply never happens. If we’re after a top-tier sensor in a sensible body? Everything else is up against that. Unless you need AF, but if you need AF why haven’t you already bought either a Sony or a Canon? Panasonic has a slim chance with an S1H successor, but IMO it can’t be a hybrid type body. People who like that kind of physical handling already have a figurative bagillion LUMIX bodies to pick from. One more would be the nail in the coffin. -
I'm all for smarter addons like magic mask or smarter tools, but if it starts telling me how to make something better, no thanks. Not sure you'll see much discussion on it. I'm guessing it will decided for our own good what we are allowed do with it. Its in its infancy at the moment, give it some time. From a male third person perspective, not literally i assure you.. i'd expect there to be lots of her husband in her. I presume if english isnt your primary language then chagpt could be beneficial. However is it you ? is it authentic ? -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
Not directly, but the Zoom F3 is close to the same size as the Panasonic XLR adapter, but only costs $300 where the Panasonic adapter adds $500. It can mount on top of the Z3 and record 32-bit internally while giving a clean feed to the camera which can record 24-bit internally. While it's less convenient to sync files in post, you would also only have to do that in cases where you actually need 32-bit which, for a vast majority of people, will be rare. Also unlike the Panasonic adapter which will probably only work on Lumix cameras, it will work on any camera you want to use. Less convenient, but the goal is accomplished. https://zoomcorp.com/en/us/field-recorders/field-recorders/f3/ That's also fair enough. I don't rule out that there's much bigger demand for a feature than I'd expect, but that is certainly a weird one. Yes, 3:2 is certainly useful with a 1.5 or 1.6x anamorphic adapter which, at least, gives a bit more of the anamorphic look. Though for a 2x anamorphic, it's still far from ideal since you end up with 3:1 which looks nice, but ends up being a really thin strip on a lot of TV's and monitors and isn't a native aspect ratio on a lot of theater screens.
-
