Subforums
17,082 topics in this forum
-
- 20 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.4m views
-
- 517 replies
- 162.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 10.2k views
-
- 36 replies
- 10.9k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 39 views
-
- 69 replies
- 7.7k views
-
- 228 replies
- 83.7k views
-
- 11 replies
- 456 views
-
- 21 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 9 replies
- 425 views
-
- 0 replies
- 93 views
-
- 118 replies
- 22.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 85 views
-
- 47 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 25 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.7k views
-
Grant Petty on the future of DaVinci Resolve Studio pricing: "We'll probably eventually charge some kind of upgrade for this." 1 2
- 22 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 757 replies
- 164.6k views
-
- 33 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 522 views
-
- 7 replies
- 412 views
-
- 36 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 596 views
-
- 0 replies
- 340 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 23 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 12 replies
- 858 views
-
Anyone with a Panasonic S5 II or S9 interested in testing my in-cam ARRI compatible LOG C3 profile? 1 2
- 25 replies
- 5.2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 727 views
-
- 14 replies
- 988 views
-
- 163 replies
- 7.5k views
-
- 56 replies
- 8.3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1k views
-
- 605 replies
- 37.8k views
-
- 69 replies
- 5k views
-
- 55 replies
- 6.9k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.1k
-
Total Posts347.3k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
-
It's not a Lumix but an update FX3 killer! : D Just arrived... FX3A, here's a crucial breakdown (from this source) : Key Differences (FX3A vs FX3) LCD Screen: The most significant change is an upgraded rear LCD screen. The original FX3 featured a screen with approximately 1.44 million dots. The new FX3A incorporates a higher-resolution LCD with approximately 2.36 million dots, the same used in the FX30. This should provide a sharper and more detailed image for monitoring and menu navigation. USB Port: Some sources indicate the FX3A features a more standardized USB-C connection, potentially replacing an older USB 3.2 Gen 1 port on the original FX3. This aims to improve compatibility with modern accessories and streamline workflows. Included Charger: The FX3A is reported to ship with a dual battery charger (BC-QZ1), an improvement over the single-slot charger that came with the original FX3. Removed Features: Some minor, largely defunct features like the infrared remote function and NFC may have been removed in the FX3A. Excluded Accessories: The FX3A reportedly no longer ships with a USB-C cable or power cord. Price: There are indications that the FX3A might have a higher price point (around $4500 in the USA) due to new tariff rules, though this can vary by region and retailer. Some UK retailers list it around £3,599.00. $3,899.99 https://electronics.sony.com/imaging/interchangeable-lens-cameras/all-interchangeable-lens-cameras/p/ilmefx3a
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
In my experience, if you're editing on a laptop - and especially if you want to do it while not plugged in, modern Macbooks are really hard to beat. My M2 Max is good enough that I no longer see any reason that I'd keep a desktop computer around (I still have one for gaming and if selling it wouldn't be a big pain, I'd probably do that since I boot it up about once per month). On the other hand, if you want the highest price to performance (and absolute highest performance) on a desktop computer, PC hardware is more powerful - and in many cases, you will be able to upgrade pieces instead of needing to upgrade the entire unit. As far as your proposed spec, I think you'll be unbalanced in favor of a very high-end processor and a mid-range graphics card. You might consider a somewhat lesser CPU, again knowing that upgrading in the future will be an option if needed. Do you plan to overclock the CPU? If not, there's not much benefit to a K vs non-K variant. One other consideration might be whether you plan to use any of the "AI" features that are being added to Resolve. If so, it might be worth considering one of the newer Intel Core Ultra chips (if the price difference isn't huge) since the main "benefit" of them over 14th generation is that they have a coprocessor for machine learning. I have no idea if Resolve can even use it yet, but even if it doesn't yet, it's a safe bet that BMD will add support in the near future. Anyway, that setup will be night and day faster than what you're using now. You definitely won't be going wrong with it. -
By zerocool22 · Posted
Oh I do have an m1 macbook lying around, but I never use it. I prefer windows. But if it works better, I might need to switch. -
By zerocool22 · Posted
Hi guys, So my pc is getting old around 5 years now. Playback rate is not that great in davinci resolve to the point I am losing too much time, still running an amd ryzen 1700x and gtx1080, SSD's and 32GB RAM. Not sure if there are any major breakthroughs that have sped up your editing workflow through your pc hardware lately. Thinking about getting an i9 14900k and an rtx 4070. But open to any advice! Thanks!
-
