Subforums
16,731 topics in this forum
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.2m views
-
- 1.7k replies
- 353.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 7.1k views
-
- 9 replies
- 203 views
-
- 14 replies
- 255 views
-
- 7 replies
- 316 views
-
- 20 replies
- 710 views
-
- 125 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 1.1k replies
- 126.7k views
-
- 4 replies
- 257 views
-
- 14 replies
- 3k views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 419 views
-
- 100 replies
- 10.9k views
-
- 331 replies
- 74.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 296 views
-
- 55 replies
- 3k views
-
- 13 replies
- 468 views
-
- 41 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 39 replies
- 15.8k views
-
- 443 replies
- 32.5k views
-
- 39 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 617 views
-
- 235 replies
- 16.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 339 views
-
- 53 replies
- 4.9k views
-
- 17 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 30 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 18 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 78 replies
- 14.4k views
-
- 17 replies
- 5.3k views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 473 replies
- 125.2k views
-
- 55 replies
- 10k views
-
- 2 replies
- 567 views
-
- 0 replies
- 296 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.1k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics16.7k
-
Total Posts338.2k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
I agree (as someone who has done all my editing for years on either gaming or workstation-class laptops). Generally, decent laptops in both of those categories should have cooling good enough for long-term high CPU and GPU loads, but you do need to choose carefully - and expect them to be noisy when they are working hard! Also be careful when comparing desktop and laptop GPUs - they can have the same or very similar model numbers, but the laptop version might have different performance specs (and more aggressive thermal management) e.g. : (info from Wikipedia) The desktop version of the nVidia Quadro RTX 4000 (100-125 watts Thermal Design Power): ...versus the mobile version (60-80 watts TDP): -
CP16. Cinema Products brand…who were also making this new gadget called a Steadicam that’s about to be 50 years old. It was a common news film camera. They also had mag film where the sound was recorded directly onto a mag stripe on the film itself. It wasn’t as good as the open reel recorder of course. I used one on my first short movie. It feels very cheap and lightweight but it was a staple. -
Maybe Canon are thinking that they'll keep their exclusivity on the super-sharp super-expensive lenses, but let the third-parties develop lower cost less technically perfect lenses? It would make sense and make the system a lot more accessible and attract a lot of new customers that wouldn't want to spend top dollar on pristine lenses. Their success on the EF line and how ubiquitous it was must have been a critical factor in their earnings over the decades, so making RF a new default standard is very much in their interests. You might be right about the split between FF and APS-C lenses though - that's still a strategy in a similar direction. -
This might be a blessing-in-disguise, as a lot of cameras actually lose the last few seconds of footage before you hit stop. So it might be compensating for that and making sure no clips are cut short.
-
It's worth pointing out that the thermals might be the dominant factor here, considering that laptops will throttle down on their performance in order to manage overheating, so a few extra fans in the laptop can make more difference than which model of CPU / GPU you buy!
-
