Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,852 visits to this link)
17,311 topics in this forum
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.9m views
-
- 706 replies
- 327.1k views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 499.9k views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.8m views
-
- 0 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 789.7k views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 27 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 5 replies
- 685 views
-
- 571 replies
- 271.6k views
-
- 14 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 505 replies
- 165.5k views
-
- 28 replies
- 14.8k views
-
- 24 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 391 views
-
Internal 32-bit float stereo paired with lossless 120mm reach from a 20mm lens — all inside a genuinely pocket-sized 10-bit 1-inch sensor gimbal camera? 1 2 3 4
- 74 replies
- 7.1k views
-
- 26 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 5 replies
- 711 views
-
- 1 reply
- 396 views
-
- 38 replies
- 4.4k views
-
- 29 replies
- 8.9k views
-
- 39 replies
- 17.2k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 86 replies
- 13k views
-
- 14 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 794 views
-
- 1 reply
- 420 views
-
- 53 replies
- 6.7k views
-
- 62 replies
- 22.7k views
-
- 64 replies
- 9.6k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 108 replies
- 81.6k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 42 replies
- 12.2k views
-
- 31 replies
- 7.9k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 129 replies
- 68.8k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.7k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts352.3k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
FFS, got to be THE WORST 'soft' launch ever as I have never heard of this until 2 minutes ago...and been in the market for something like this for months to replace my broken LUMIX 70-200mm f4!! Just bought the Sigma 28-105mm f2.8 to do the job instead not really needing 200mm but would have preferred 150... Hey ho, might consider it for next year but spent up now having just made the decision to exchange my LUMIX f1.8: 18/35/50/85 and spare Sigma 28-70 for the Sigma f1.4 trio of: 20/35/85 I was considering a different camera for stills for 2027 but dropped the idea after downloading some files and trying them earlier today... -
I would have published the demo already, but I’m currently having a problem with GUI rotation between portrait and landscape modes — it used to work, and then suddenly stopped. RAW/RAWC does a nice job of compressing the full usable dynamic range of the smartphone sensor.I'm still making little adjustments -
I will say that even though the Beastgrip adapters are made for phone use, they actually have very good build quality and the newest versions have pretty decent optics, with 1.33x being better corrected than the 1.55x. They also have good front filter threads - the 1.33 uses 58mm and the 1.55 is 62mm. Once you get them properly attached to your lens, they aren't going anywhere. The first versions are not as well corrected, but that may be what you are looking for. The build quality seems consistently good across all models and versions. I'm guessing you could find some on the used market for reasonable prices, as they aren't super expensive to begin with. -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
And owners of many cinema cameras. And, to a large extent, owners of cameras with sensor shift IS. I've found that, in general, lens IS is a lot better than sensor shift IS when at longer focal lengths. There are already a bunch of used Sigma/Tamron 70-200/2.8 available in that price range. Plus even some first party options aren't much more used - the EF 70-200/2.8L IS series tend to be right around $1,000-1,200 at MPB here. If you really want the extra 10mm at the wide end, though, it looks fine. -
Well, here's another interesting one from Samyang for L-mount. Previously Sony FE only... ...now also available in L-mount ; ) The new LK Samyang AF 60-180mm F2.8 weighs only 728g, which is remarkably light for a constant f/2.8 full-frame telephoto zoom (and at about a grand it is also considerably cheaper than the usual 70-200mm f/2.8 options). It has no optical stabilization (OIS), in either L-mount or Sony FE, unfortunately : ( A deal breaker for Sigma FP owners/lovers, as for instance. 60mm at the wide end is actually quite useful for video, and losing 20mm at the long end seems a very reasonable trade-off for that size and weight.
-
