Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,435 visits to this link)
17,205 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.4m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 407.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 477 views
-
- 700 replies
- 277.4k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.7m views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 689.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 490 views
-
- 543 replies
- 244.2k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 290 views
-
- 78 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 8 replies
- 545 views
-
- 5 replies
- 234 views
-
- 20 replies
- 697 views
-
- 66 replies
- 32.6k views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 114 replies
- 52.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 515 views
-
- 462 replies
- 108.5k views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 3 replies
- 837 views
-
- 16 replies
- 776 views
-
- 63 replies
- 32.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 615 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 10 replies
- 785 views
-
- 8 replies
- 579 views
-
- 3 replies
- 429 views
-
- 12 replies
- 806 views
-
- 0 replies
- 311 views
-
- 15 replies
- 8.4k views
-
- 103 replies
- 52.5k views
-
- 7 replies
- 494 views
-
- 6 replies
- 877 views
-
- 2 replies
- 502 views
-
- 5 replies
- 921 views
-
- 0 replies
- 326 views
-
- 20 replies
- 7.7k views
-
- 22 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 397 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts350.7k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Good call. I have spent years and years going back and forth between primes and zooms and in the end came to what should have been a very obvious conclusion and that is I need both. Depending on the circumstances. In an ideal world, I could do it all with fast zooms but fast zooms (faster than f2.8) are a rarity and come with the penalty of size & weight. I was debating (yet again) at the end of my most recent season the case for continuing with just primes (needs +1 body) or going back to zooms (needs -1 body) but there are compromises to both scenarios. Instead, I decided to go with the -1 body, but keep the primes and though it means a couple of extra lenses in my bag, that (and having to do a lens swap every now and again) is my only compromise. I took a very hard look at the G9II and I think if my needs were different, I might have gone for it (over the OM-1) but in the end decided I wished to stick with full-frame stills but would go back to shooting S35 for video. Which is what I am doing. -
Settled on getting a combo of the Panasonic 12-35 2.8 II and the Panasonic/DJI 15mm 1.7! I figured 12-35 2.8 would be enough for a lot, and for the few times I know I need more shallow DOF, that 15mm 1.7 would give me a 30mm equiv which is a SUPER versatile focal length, while having very decent DOF. -
Exactly. It does so much for such a cheap price. I am currently very torn between getting a Panasonic 12-35 2.8 II or a Sigma 18-35 1.8 & Metabones 0.64x speedbooster. I know both will autofocus well. I am unsure...would I prefer the small size of the Panasonic 12-35 or would I appreciate the 2 stops extra lowlight I'd get with the sigma combo. DOF is far from everything, so I think I could live with the DOF of the 12-35...decisions decisions.
-
By Eric Matyas · Posted
Hi Everyone, What a year...ugh. In these troubling times, I thought I'd finish out the year with a music track that maybe offers a little bit of hope: "THE MEADOW WE CALL HOME" (looping) You can listen to it here: https://soundimage.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/The-Meadow-We-Call-Home.ogg And download it here: https://soundimage.org/fantasy-13/ Have a safe New Years Eve. -
By Andrew - EOSHD · Posted
Once they brought the price down it made so much more sense to me, $2k region was always asking just a tad too much for a Micro Four Thirds camera, at least that was the perception. But this now has the specs of a $6k camera, only it's a Micro Four Thirds size sensor. So even at $2k it's a good deal. At nearly half that it's a total must-have. In the old days, the smaller sensor lacked dynamic range, low light performance and decent autofocus. This is just not the issue it used to be, gap has closed up.
-
