Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (24,025 visits to this link)
17,325 topics in this forum
-
- 5.8k replies
- 2m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 516.4k views
-
- 706 replies
- 336.4k views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.8m views
-
- 0 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 802.6k views
-
- 32 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 202 views
-
- 7 replies
- 180 views
-
- 29 replies
- 50.4k views
-
- 57 replies
- 8.9k views
-
- 7 replies
- 483 views
-
- 22 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 117 views
-
- 74 replies
- 12.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 36 views
-
- 5 replies
- 314 views
-
- 11 replies
- 664 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 173 views
-
- 3 replies
- 846 views
-
- 18 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 32 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 517 replies
- 174.4k views
-
- 315 replies
- 150.7k views
-
- 47 replies
- 22.7k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 549 views
-
- 109 replies
- 47.6k views
-
- 573 replies
- 275.4k views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 92 replies
- 16k views
-
- 14 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 14 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 28 replies
- 16k views
-
- 24 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 847 views
-
Internal 32-bit float stereo paired with lossless 120mm reach from a 20mm lens — all inside a genuinely pocket-sized 10-bit 1-inch sensor gimbal camera? 1 2 3 4
- 74 replies
- 9.3k views
.thumb.jpg.dd92759bb2822fdc7e13dd70abd53569.jpg)
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts352.5k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By newfoundmass · Posted
Very soft but cool none the less! -
Not sure I’m experimenting with it but that’s certainly where I end up… -
By John Matthews · Posted
I'm curious to know how that turns out. That kind of magnification requires near-perfect conditions for decent results. -
Thanks for your comments. I'm looking forward to mounting the ils to a fd 500mm mirror lens which will sit on a sky watcher mount for moon shots. i could add in a 2x teleconverter but i prefer a 1.4 converter. They just seem to have an edge to me. Which is something i don't have at the moment. Isn't it ironic, how companies decide on how to implement features. Some critical thinkers might go with the word crippled but i like to be more polite usually. -
Honestly i thought i was generalizing, i don't believe i was accusing you of piracy. Apologies to you, if you thought that. Well not a music concert but we just had kylie Minogue do the half time entertainment at the afl grand final. I would expect out of the 100 000 crowd probably 95000 filmed that section with their smart phones. I doubt any of them would be accredited, I would have too, if i'd been there... 🥰 Hopefully the emoji displays properly as i been having issues with those little suckers.. I presume there would be licencing agreements and financial arrangements between the afl and tv stations about video copyright. I suppose neither group like the idea of having potentially a 100 000 smart phones or a smaller amount of cameras at the event but there's probably not much that can be done about it within reason. I could certainly see them getting agitated at someone wandering in with a 600mm lens without prior arrangement and i don't have a problem with that. I suspect a 600mm lens comes under "professional use" rather normal use or casual use. Personally i can see three use cases, for cameras at events, maybe you can think of more. 1) I can show my friends and family without issue that i was there having a good time 2) I could take a ten second selfie of my ugly mug and a very small pixelated kylie strutting her stuff in the background for a vlog, again no real issues. 3) I could conceivably somehow sneak a small monopod, a modern mirrorless camera with two forms of stabilization and a 10 times zoom and have at it, without paying a large chunk of money to either company and reproducing it on my social medium of choice. How to make money out of it, i have no idea. Maybe its not about the money, it could be the likes i guess or even giving the finger to the establishment. What people do and why, continues to amaze me at times. But i think we could both agree, due to intent, option 3 is wrong (probably on many levels) Initially i read this and had no idea what you were alluding to. Blame linguistics. semantics, continental drift.. In hindsight i missed the emoji as it didn't display for me properly, i now suspect what you said was tongue in cheek, it seems i misunderstood your meaning and jumped to the wrong conclusion, which may have led to the piracy issue you raised, sorry about that. Any time there is money involved or to be made, people are going to get antsy if they think their missing out. I suspect if you hosted an event free or otherwise and were the only person organised to cover that event and expected a financial return from publishing online and i rock up with my 8k gopro on a gimbal and wave it around and you find my video online for a small fee or even free later that evening, you'd be a little agitated, your not going to give me a medal.
-
