Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,765 visits to this link)
17,224 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.5m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 432.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 955 views
-
- 700 replies
- 288.8k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 717.3k views
-
- 95 replies
- 37.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 106 views
-
- 12 replies
- 9.3k views
-
- 8 replies
- 545 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2k views
-
- 551 replies
- 249.1k views
-
- 45 replies
- 15.7k views
-
- 36 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 64 replies
- 34.8k views
-
- 468 replies
- 124.8k views
-
- 11 replies
- 6.7k views
-
- 48 replies
- 11.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 318 views
-
- 0 replies
- 368 views
-
- 0 replies
- 235 views
-
- 28 replies
- 4.4k views
-
- 85 replies
- 8.3k views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 29 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 335 views
-
- 3 replies
- 713 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1k views
-
- 57 replies
- 5.9k views
-
- 67 replies
- 35k views
-
- 87 replies
- 64.4k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 781 views
-
- 9 replies
- 957 views
-
- 1 reply
- 594 views
-
- 5 replies
- 6.8k views
-
- 55 replies
- 28.1k views
-
- 34 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 75 replies
- 51.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 710 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts351k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
These days, my travel setup looks a bit different, but with a similar goal of traveling light. I just bring the GFX 100 II and for lenses, the EF 35/1.4L II and the Fujinon 110/2. I used to bring the Fujinon 32-64/4 instead, but then I needed to bring something for lower light/night shooting. Plus a 2x zoom makes less sense when I can just crop anyway. I was looking at the GFX 100RF, but it's really not all that small and when I realized I was willing to accept a fixed 35 with that, I decided to just do the same thing, but, y'know, fast. For video, the GFX also makes it more like I have 4 lenses instead of 2. I can record in 4K or 5.8K at full sensor width - so effectively a 28mm or 80mm lens in FF terms - but if I switch to 8K, the crop is close to FF so I also have a 35 and 110mm lenses - with plenty of resolution to crop in if I want to. The fact that it's 8K is less interesting than it being a bit cropped. 😅 I don't really need to get all that wide so the 35 is usually enough, even if I crop in a little when IBIS darkens the corners a little. For photos, there's enough room to crop in that I can get reasonable results going anywhere from around 27-28mm on full frame to... something like 200-300mm after cropping. For ND filters, I just bring a set of Kase clip-in filters - ND8, ND64, and ND1000. The entire set fits in a tiny little box and weighs almost nothing. For a tripod, I... don't. The IBIS in the GFX is decent enough that I can get sharp photos handheld as long there's at least some light (if it's too dim for around 1/15second at f/1.4 at ISO 6400, that's rough - but it's just not a scenario I'm optimizing for these days). Limitations? Longer exposures for waterfalls are hit and miss. I usually just turn on the 2s timer at about a 1 second exposure and shoot it like 5 times and if I don't get something that's sharp with smooth water, I decide that wasn't meant to be. I have a lot of pictures of waterfalls already (I really like waterfalls). The camera and lenses are obtrusive - the GFX 100 II is smaller than my GFX 100 was and that's nice, but it's still not small. Rolling shutter in some modes is enough to be noticeable even with relatively small movement. The fact that it's obtrusive can be a really big problem - in a lot of cities, it's not a camera to casually hang around the neck and stroll around. I'm in Sao Paulo right now - there are only a few parts of the city where I'd even bring it out. BUT the good news is that my phone (iPhone 16 Pro) works absolutely fine in all of the places where I wouldn't take out my big obtrusive camera. The iPhone is good enough that I take out the big camera less and less, even when it would be totally safe to take it out. -
By John Matthews · Posted
My take: Panasonic’s Head of Imaging practices a rare art: saying almost nothing with exceptional stamina. The translator deserve a standing ovation for turning sprawling verbal marathons into neat, meaningful summaries. I read each phrase 3 times before moving on to the next. -
This is awesome - thanks for sharing! What kind of DCTLs are you writing? -
By Clark Nikolai · Posted
This reminds me of using my old Sony camcorder with the 5.1 surround sound microphone. I would shoot with it, then in post be able to isolate each channel and choose which one to use and ignore the ones that were just location noise. Pretty handy without much effort when shooting. This might be similar in that sense. -
By John Matthews · Posted
Fair enough. I just wish they'd spent time and resources elsewhere. I want a small, up-to-date, Panasonic M43 camera, not an overly complex version of a on-camera mic. This seems like a great product for 2010. But what do I know, maybe this THE MIC, the one that everyone was waiting for. What I can tell you with 100% certainty, people are ready and willing to pay vast sums of money for old gear, only because it's small. What happened Panasonic? The whole miniaturization of components thing has been apparently disregarded.
-
