Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (24,017 visits to this link)
17,324 topics in this forum
-
- 5.8k replies
- 2m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 514.4k views
-
- 706 replies
- 335.8k views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.8m views
-
- 0 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 800.8k views
-
- 28 replies
- 817 views
-
- 3 replies
- 51 views
-
- 57 replies
- 8.7k views
-
- 7 replies
- 409 views
-
- 2 replies
- 53 views
-
- 22 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 2 replies
- 63 views
-
- 74 replies
- 12.4k views
-
- 5 replies
- 271 views
-
- 11 replies
- 606 views
-
- 5 replies
- 950 views
-
- 0 replies
- 147 views
-
- 3 replies
- 811 views
-
- 18 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 32 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 517 replies
- 173.5k views
-
- 315 replies
- 150.2k views
-
- 47 replies
- 22.6k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 525 views
-
- 109 replies
- 47.4k views
-
- 573 replies
- 275.3k views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 92 replies
- 15.8k views
-
- 14 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 14 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 28 replies
- 16k views
-
- 24 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 822 views
-
Internal 32-bit float stereo paired with lossless 120mm reach from a 20mm lens — all inside a genuinely pocket-sized 10-bit 1-inch sensor gimbal camera? 1 2 3 4
- 74 replies
- 9.1k views
-
- 26 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.2k views
.thumb.jpg.dd92759bb2822fdc7e13dd70abd53569.jpg)
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts352.5k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By John Matthews · Posted
I'd say it's a similar experience to your Olympus (I've had many of those, too). I will say that the colors look rather strange on the back of the screen when using peaking. I start with the lens's distance scale, then confirm with peaking. If you need critical focus, use the double-tap method. Of course, it all depends on your resolution. 8K is much harder than 4K. Shallow DOF can be achieved with this camera, but you will undoubtedly miss shots. Still, I prefer the simplicity of being intentional rather than fighting "AI" algorithms. It's far easier for me to live with screwing it up myself than having some engineer "imagine" what I'll be shooting 10000km away and program the computer to do it—and have it fail sometimes. -
Lets just remember its basically an action camera that had fixed focus for the longest time. Gopro are to be lauded for giving us a mount that allows different lenses, maybe not every lens in the world, but an improvement on what came before. I look at like, baby steps, its a start. Getting af and every other modern lens feature would be akin to putting another man on the moon i think. Probably not doable for $700 us I suspect electronics and af motors in the lens would probably drain the battery pretty quick. The mission 1 does have better battery life, i guess GoPro didn't want to jeopardise that for a pretty niche product. Well i think of af as a pretty niche product, for the longest time cinema cameras didn't have af, realistically af is a fairly new development. No doubt lots of people will argue about it but i have gotten used to peaking and for me no af is a abit of a non event anyway. -
Emanuel, drop anything from a suitable height and you'll get results... although i wont go into detail about how to maximise your results... pink floyd once did a bootleg of the bootleggers taken from their concerts. Considering the price of tickets for these events these days aren't cheap. I feel it should probably come with a digital download after the event. I don't condone for want of a better phrase err... event video piracy however if its a 1 off event and its for personal use like nostalgia then i feel thats ok, however it you make a living from filming events and aren't accredited then thats just wrong.
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
I don't know if I have any cameras that record in 8-bit at this point, but I can certainly poke around a little. Worst case, I could go even lower-fi and just shoot it on the PXL-2000. -
No clue what it is for you but to me and maybe in fact or, definitely, not for the usual naysayers ; ) it is OOAK (EAG :- )
-
