Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,176 visits to this link)
17,278 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 455.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 700 replies
- 301.6k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 744.4k views
-
- 29 replies
- 613 views
-
- 2 replies
- 59 views
-
- 3 replies
- 150 views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 26 replies
- 19k views
-
- 78 replies
- 54.3k views
-
- 118 replies
- 61.3k views
-
- 125 replies
- 55.4k views
-
- 69 replies
- 33.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 105 replies
- 41.5k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 248 views
-
- 15 replies
- 712 views
-
- 9 replies
- 995 views
-
- 0 replies
- 398 views
-
- 4 replies
- 448 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 44 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 308 views
-
- 56 replies
- 5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 406 views
-
- 14 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 373 views
-
- 59 replies
- 18.6k views
-
- 32 replies
- 6k views
-
- 122 replies
- 24.4k views
-
- 10 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 5 replies
- 750 views
-
- 470 replies
- 139.7k views
-
- 8 replies
- 840 views
-
- 27 replies
- 5.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 488 views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.5k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.6k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Same intern that is currently doing their marketing is also in charge of product naming. -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
I now think that calling it the L10 was also a mistake. I watched the Micro Four Nerds video about it earlier anud the camera looked very big in the presenter's hands. I looked it up the Panasonic L10 on cameradecision and compared it to some other cameras and was outraged by how much bigger it was than the LX100. Then I noticed something about 10 megapixels and realized that the Panasonic L10 was a 10 megapixel Micro 4/3 camera from 2007. The Panasonic Lumix L10, on the other hand, is quite small. Was L10 such a great name that they couldn't change it after somebody pointed out that they already had a camera called the L10 and there would be some confusion from people who looked it up? -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
There are a bunch of weird 🔨 limitations on the R6 V. Nowadays, I'd expect a $2,500 video-centric camera to have shutter angle, at least. I'm not sure if a dedicated timecode port is a reasonable expectation, but in my mind, it should have one. Those would go al long way to making it a proper B cam to one of the cinema line cameras. -
The battle of Resolution vs Common Sense was over long ago and us consumers were the losers. -
By Andrew - EOSHD · Posted
The clearest sign yet that people's critical thinking might be in a dodgy place... 7K RAW on a content creator's camera with a tripod mount to shoot in portrait orientation. Now let's remind ourselves: Why do people shoot vertical video - because of phones How big is a phone screen - Erm, about 7 inches tall How much resolution is 7K in vertical format... 1000 dots per inch! What DPI are the best flagship phone displays? Well, iPhone 17 Pro Max is 2868 ×1320, so about 450dpi, and that is overkill already because to make out the individual pixels you need a microscope. Those Instagram stories never looked so good.
-
