Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,179 visits to this link)
17,278 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 455.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 700 replies
- 301.7k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 745k views
-
- 79 replies
- 54.3k views
-
- 10 replies
- 287 views
-
- 36 replies
- 816 views
-
- 4 replies
- 171 views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 26 replies
- 19.1k views
-
- 118 replies
- 61.4k views
-
- 125 replies
- 55.5k views
-
- 69 replies
- 33.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 105 replies
- 41.5k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 260 views
-
- 15 replies
- 720 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 408 views
-
- 4 replies
- 453 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 44 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 313 views
-
- 56 replies
- 5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 412 views
-
- 14 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 377 views
-
- 59 replies
- 18.6k views
-
- 32 replies
- 6k views
-
- 122 replies
- 24.4k views
-
- 10 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 5 replies
- 754 views
-
- 470 replies
- 139.9k views
-
- 8 replies
- 848 views
-
- 27 replies
- 5.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 494 views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.5k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.6k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
I’ve also had an email this week trying to get me to rush down to London for the MPTS broadcast show lest I miss their headline speaker…..erm…. Michael Gove The irony/shamefulness of having him as an expert speaker when his most famous contribution to political discourse in the UK was this. -
It’s the Frank Sinatra of camera review retirements then.
-
By John Matthews · Posted
This looks like a really cool set-up. One thing I would definitely be worried about is the lens though design. Optically, from everything I've seen it looks great, but it has been well-known to have issues with dust getting trapped inside and that was the reason I never really went after the LX100(I or II). However, it's the same problem with almost all POS cameras. Did Lumix say anything about this? -
By Ilkka Nissila · Posted
Presumably, the h.265 quality is better on the Canon. The vertical mounting hole is so you can use as much as possible of the sensor (for the lowest noise and shallowest DOF, if desired) when 100% committed to vertical video. The extra resolution is for when you want to shoot both horizontal and vertical content and crop the latter from the content. Presumably billboard screens can display higher resolution video content if they are really 4K TVs mounted vertically. Of course the extra resolution is not really necessary and the vertical orientation in 16:9 aspect ratio is quite badly suited for video but for narcissistic content showing only the creator rather a person in an environment, it is what seems to be used. In my opinion, a less narrow vertical aspect ratio would work much better but the pocketability, hand-holdability, and availability of devices seems to dictate the aspect ratio. Above all, the manufacturers need increased specs to sell more cameras than are truly needed for any practical purpose, and they don't care about the e-waste, because they are not forced to care. -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
As of now, RF mount is the only one they're promising, but who knows after that? I'll just need to grab one quick before Canon's lawyers get to them. 😅
-
