Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,189 visits to this link)
17,279 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 456k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 700 replies
- 301.9k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 745.6k views
-
- 42 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 162 views
-
- 559 replies
- 255.8k views
-
- 13 replies
- 425 views
-
- 9 replies
- 328 views
-
- 79 replies
- 54.5k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 26 replies
- 19.2k views
-
- 118 replies
- 61.5k views
-
- 125 replies
- 55.6k views
-
- 69 replies
- 33.3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 105 replies
- 41.6k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 295 views
-
- 15 replies
- 757 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 435 views
-
- 4 replies
- 480 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 44 replies
- 3k views
-
- 1 reply
- 336 views
-
- 56 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 435 views
-
- 14 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 394 views
-
- 59 replies
- 18.6k views
-
- 32 replies
- 6k views
-
- 122 replies
- 24.5k views
-
- 10 replies
- 4k views
-
- 5 replies
- 772 views
-
- 470 replies
- 140.4k views
-
- 8 replies
- 879 views
-
- 27 replies
- 5.2k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.6k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Typing that reply certainly did make me warm even more to the LX100 and L10, but considering I have the GX85 and 14mm F2.5 already (and are therefore a FREE option!) it's pretty hard to beat for a number of reasons.. The size with the 14/2.5 is similar, and it doesn't get larger when you turn it on: As I edit in 1080p and am softening the image in-post rather than sharpening it, the 14/2.5 on the GX85 can be a 31mm and a 62mm (with the 2x zoom function) which are both absolutely awesome focal lengths for shooting how I like to shoot. I can easily bring other lenses if I am shooting something worth putting some effort into shooting (ie, it's not just an EDC opportunity). I've shot an absolute ton of tests on the GX85 so I know it inside and out. Like most of us here, I both crave the simplicity of having a fixed-lens setup that would do most of what I want, but I crave the choice and freedom of the options that an interchangeable lens mount provides! -
Your right of course. I did forget to mention that some skill is involved I was being slightly facetious. I can see how its a win for oppo to send him a smartphone to "vlog" with. Less clear to me is how brandon li wins ? I guess you could call playing with a 8k smartphone a win. Theres only a link to take you to the oppo site. Am i over thinking it, if i presume theres some code in the link that tells oppo i have come from a brandon li youtube ? Ok i had a look at some of his other vids there are some affiliative links for gear and there's a camera course and gimbal course to purchase if that interests you. I guess his approach is slightly more refined / tasteful than the usual here's the links to everything i use youtube shrill. -
By Eric Matyas · Posted
Need some custom music created special for your game or project? I'd love to help out! I've worked with around 100 game developers so far...mostly small indie game studios and solo developers. You can read about their experiences working with me here: https://soundimage.org/custom-work/ That said, my quest continues to make every single looping music track on my website available in Ogg format. This week's tracks are: "QUIRKY RUNNER" https://soundimage.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Quirky-Runner_Looping.ogg "NEON RUNNER" https://soundimage.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Neon-Runner_Looping.ogg You can freely download them here: https://soundimage.org/dance-techno/ So why do this? Because Ogg tracks loop a lot better in game engines. Plus they sound more rich and full than Mp3. (I deliver all client work in Ogg format.) WHAT ABOUT THE MUSIC PACKS? If you're wondering, all of the looping tracks in my music packs are already in Ogg format. These genres are: Fantasy Sci-Fi Action Funny Chiptunes Dark/Ominous Horror/Surreal Puzzle Music You can check out my packs here: https://soundimage.org/ogg-game-music-mega-pack/ https://soundimage.org/ogg-music-packs-2/ Eventually, I'd like to add genres like "techno" to the packs (once all the looping tracks in those genres are in Ogg format.) Other genres will be "Quiet," "Nature/Science," "Technology," and hopefully, "Epic/Battle." Anyhow, that's the rational behind the madness. 😉 Finally, I want to thank the kind content creators who help with the fundraising dimension of what I do. If you'd like to help out, you can contribute here: https://soundimage.org/donate/ As always, enjoy, please stay safe and keep creating! 🙂 -
By Marcio Kabke Pinheiro · Posted
Already looked a ton of reviews for this one, since is (almost) the camera I was waiting since 2014, when I got my OG LX100 - it was my first 4k camera. Still have it here, internal batery dead, but still functioning well. For years tried to get an MK II, but the used prices are insane (should drop now). This one solves a lot of problems of the LX100 I and II: - Finally it have a PDAF sensor on it, and with more resolution to boot (12mp on the OG, 17 mp in MK II, 20 mp in this one). - The sequential field EVF is gone, is a proper OLED now, the same 2,36mp panel that everyones uses. Never had the tearing issue with my LX100, past in the day it was on par of the others, but now you see the resolution difference. - Movable LCD. I would prefer a tilt screen instead of a flip, but in todays market, I undersatnd the decision. - More controls, more customization, LUT support (this is a MUST), switch for stills / video / S&Q, and now is a PASM model (In the LX100 you had to remember to set the shutter speed manually every time you wants to record a video). I was 100% sure to get one, and I saw the price. Ouch. But newer cameras are pricier each day. And after I saw some things: - The camera is much larger than the LX100 models - in fact, have almost the same size than a S9. Ok, they fitted a much larger battery, but...for m43, it could be much smaller. Battery aside, it could have the old size (even with some video lenght cap, like 30 mins - not the 15 min of the LX100)...and than I realized. - Panasonic now have the tendency to share body design between cameras (S5II and G9 II, for example). Then my prediction - this body will be shared with the S9 II, EVF and all. - About the lens - is exactly the same, but the PetaPIxel guys said that Panasonic told them that the dust problem was addressed. And the stills appear much sharper than the MK II, looks like there were som optimization. - No IBIS - Probably it would cause trouble the the "multi-aspect" of the sensor. The lens does not cover the whole sensor, and vignette would appear if the sensor moves (which does not occur with the lens OIS). Internal space for an IBIS they have for spare - the GX9 is much smaller and have a very good IBIS. They should keep the lens formula the same, just make it larger (to cover the whole sensor) but...profits. It is a very good camera, and I still want it badly. But is expensive, and for an EDC camera, for my use cases, an RX100 VII is a more versatile and smaller proposition (and costs the same new, much kess used). The X-E5 is almost a dream camera to me too, and I did not bought one, again for the price. And I shoot less and less, hard to justify it. -
By fuzzynormal · Posted
Yeah. That's why marketing is so important to the companies trying to sell 'em.
-
