Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,051 visits to this link)
17,266 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 447.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 700 replies
- 296.1k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 733k views
-
- 27 replies
- 4.6k views
-
- 3 replies
- 51 views
-
- 5 replies
- 159 views
-
- 1 reply
- 30 views
-
- 20 replies
- 593 views
-
- 121 replies
- 52.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 4 replies
- 230 views
-
- 6 replies
- 487 views
-
- 61 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 215 views
-
- 1 reply
- 95 views
-
- 121 replies
- 23k views
-
- 44 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 13 replies
- 377 views
-
- 558 replies
- 252.9k views
-
- 9 replies
- 888 views
-
- 3 replies
- 273 views
-
- 1 reply
- 253 views
-
- 5 replies
- 561 views
-
- 102 replies
- 39.9k views
-
- 29 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 272 views
-
- 1 reply
- 227 views
-
- 1 reply
- 273 views
-
- 58 replies
- 17.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 308 views
-
- 3 replies
- 382 views
-
- 0 replies
- 244 views
-
- 1 reply
- 708 views
-
- 5 replies
- 593 views
-
- 3 replies
- 349 views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 6 replies
- 564 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.4k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By Aussie Ash · Posted
ARRI has the secret life essence -there is strong parallels with this scene from Dr. Strangelove ! -
-
Fascinating, and reassuring too. This is why I concentrated on colour grading - the hardware was good enough and the gap was squarely with me. Can you shed any light on what colour grading / image processing was done to get an acceptable match? Was there any particular way you shot with the GH5, or lenses etc you used in order to get it to match? I would think (if it was me) that going out shooting with a GH5 knowing it would have to be intercut with Alexa footage would trigger lots of thinking about how to best go about it so it would be good enough. -
It's an interesting update for sure. While I find the upgrading process to be too much of a PITA to upgrade unless there's a killer feature in the next version I really want to use, there are a few things in there that are interesting from an AI perspective. The first is the AI Face tools, with AI Face Reshaper & AI Face Age Transformer. This is interesting because it shows their ability to track and understand faces is vastly improved from the previous generation of Face Refinement tool, which was obviously designed to have very soft masks because their tracking wasn't that great. I did an excellent course in Beauty Retouching which used Resolve and basically you apply different treatments to each area of the face as each has a different tone/colour/texture and you had to mask each one manually yourself. The ultimate would be for the AI face tools to detect the face and output a mask for each area of the face, automating the masking/tracking. The second is the Adjust Focus with AI CineFocus, which simulates a shallower DOF, and is a combination of a blur plugin with their depth map plugin. When the depth map plugin came out I tried it on some deep DOF shots to see how it did, and the results were worse than the iPhone 'cinematic mode' with the edges being a very obvious blurry transition, and you couldn't apply anything more than a barely perceptible blur before the edges ruined the shot. The fact this is now an integrated plugin means it's gotten better to the point they're willing to put it forward for this application. It's probably still a long way from blurring the background but keeping each hair on the subject in-focus, but it shows increased confidence. I know they are also doing tonnes of little things in the background too. I went through a phase of posting to the BM forums and suggesting features as I came upon things that annoyed me, and to my amusement I had professional colourists (including from Company3) reply and say they've been suggesting the same improvements to BM for year after year, and I notice that a number of these have gotten fixed in the last few versions. Still, there are gaps in the things I'd really like. One is the stabilisation, which can't handle any kind of shot that isn't perfectly rectilinear, and has no support for removing rolling shutter etc. This is possible, and I went down a deep dive at one point some years ago looking for a solution and there was a product that did it flawlessly, but the product was in the thousands-of-dollars price range so wasn't worth it for me. The stabilisation also lacks the ability to stabilise the tilt/pan/roll/zoom in different amounts. If I shoot with the BMMCC and an OIS lens for example, the lens stabilises the tilt/pan quite well but has zero roll stabilisation. I'd like to stabilise the roll almost to 100% to keep it almost perfectly fixed, while also stabilising the tilt/pan maybe 40% just to smooth off the rough edges. This isn't possible, except if I build something in Fusion, which apart from forcing me to learn Fusion, also requires I go into the Fusion window to track the shots as well, I can't build a custom OFX and then apply it in the Edit or Colour page. I don't know why BM didn't just make the stabilisation occur in a node, that way you could just apply it several times however you wanted, but it's a 'special' thing that happens once in the image pipeline, and once only. My biggest wish for Resolve 22 is lens emulation. Like the Face and CineFocus tools, the lens emulation ingredients are all there if you combine them yourself manually, but integrating them into one plugin would be pretty sweet!
-
-
