Jump to content

Subforums

  1. The EOSHD YouTube Channel   (23,662 visits to this link)

    Follow Andrew Reid on YouTube

17,305 topics in this forum

    • 706 replies
    • 320.4k views
    • 1.2k replies
    • 489k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 1.9m views
    • 9.1k replies
    • 2.8m views
    • 0 replies
    • 2k views
  2. Panasonic GH6 1 2 3 4 88

    • 1.8k replies
    • 781.8k views
    • 59 replies
    • 4.9k views
  3. LOFIC sensors are the future...

    • 14 replies
    • 709 views
    • 25 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 64 replies
    • 8.1k views
    • 11 replies
    • 570 views
    • 22 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 50 replies
    • 5.4k views
    • 567 replies
    • 268.8k views
    • 5 replies
    • 598 views
  4. Sony FX5 1 2

    • 30 replies
    • 2.3k views
  5. Nikon Zr is coming 1 2 3 4 24

    • 472 replies
    • 158.3k views
    • 4 replies
    • 604 views
    • 7 replies
    • 818 views
  6. new camera purchase 1 2 3 4 6

    • 108 replies
    • 80.2k views
    • 12 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 42 replies
    • 11.4k views
    • 31 replies
    • 7.3k views
    • 61 replies
    • 21.7k views
    • 4 replies
    • 928 views
  7. DJI Pocket 3? 1 2 3 4 7

    • 129 replies
    • 66.9k views
    • 83 replies
    • 11.5k views
    • 12 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 6 replies
    • 3.8k views
    • 19 replies
    • 13.7k views
    • 24 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 9 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 11 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
    • 14 replies
    • 9.5k views
    • 14 replies
    • 8.6k views
    • 2 replies
    • 902 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 11 replies
    • 2.9k views
    • 20 replies
    • 2.7k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.3k
    • Total Posts
      352.1k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,990
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    dietedcero1974
    Joined
  • Posts

    • You make excellent points, but it really comes down to your perspective. The detail from the 8K will be completely irrelevant, except in cinemas, where exactly zero people will ever watch this footage.  The extra DR will absolutely be visible, even on smartphones, even with a film emulation applied, and especially because these cameras are designed for wide FOV shooting outdoors where there is a high probability of having huge DR (and even the sun) in the frame. We can look at images in controlled lighting, this is true.  However under such conditions the vast majority of cameras from the last decade will look just fine.  In fact, if the older cameras have the same bit-depth in their codecs but less DR then they might look BETTER than the modern cameras as the bits will be less stretched!   So if we're going to compare modern cameras in very controlled conditions then the comparisons should include the vast hundreds of models released in the last decade or so, but if you do mention them then people go berserk because these older cameras fall short in other areas, and you can make a good argument that the controlled tests are nice but not entirely sufficient for evaluation.  In which case, the stunning differences in DR between these cameras is now back in the consideration and the DJI is miles ahead of the Luna. To summarise that a bit, if you're taking everything into consideration then the DR really matters and if you're not then why aren't you comparing dozens of older cameras, and if you desperately want a tiny gimbal but only shoot in controlled conditions then isn't that a niche application so narrow that it really can't be justified to evaluate the cameras overall? In terms of me reminding people that lower DR 1080p cameras are fine for many practical tasks, this is true, but modern camera releases have basically nothing to do with practical tasks at all.  There is no justification for 8K codecs.  Period.   The justification for 8K sensors that let you crop 2x for a 4K image is borderline but fine.   Then there's 17K - seriously...   Most camera discussions departed reality long ago and the discussions about this or that camera have the same rigour as discussing which super-hero can win against which other super-hero.
    • They only rely on IMATEST and it doesn't reveal everything. Especially these days that temporal NR algorithms are doing magic work. The RAW files of these devices are nothing like conventional RAW still images from a mirrorless camera, let alone their 10bit h.265 video. But even some still cameras turn on the NR on RAW from a certain ISO and above. This is S1II for example. The highest no-NR-applied ISO is ISO 5000
    • Found you another camera to play with..   Godox C100: accidentally the best new toy camera 😁  
    • Maybe. It could also be how the lens renders people, that gives me the sense of artificiality. I do see a significant image (and sound) quality reduction when uploading my own video to youtube at the settings and video format recommended by youtube. I've been trying to figure out how to minimize this issue, and one way is to use the highest-quality format as an intermediate for uploading (QuickTime with Prores HQ). I've not gotten to test this enough to come to a conclusion.    I think to evaluate noise reduction and other algorithmic processing done by the camera, one would need to look at subject detail also, and how faithful the details and color in the image are to the subject. This is affected by the lens in addition to digital image processing and compression, but when evaluating a fixed (non-removable) lens camera, it is fair since the user can do nothing to change the optics. Anyway, if this sensor and optics available for 1" sensors satisfy the video community then a lot of money can be saved by not having to invest in larger sensor cameras. It also means making videos of satisfactory quality (or quality that is perceived as very good by the public) will become much more accessible to the general public and thus worth less in the job market, as has become the case for still photography. However, I'm not really convinced just yet. 
    • The one thing I have not tried is the e stab, but straight out of the box with zero set up other than a quick balance, on the RS4 mini with the optional tracking module, it worked superbly. Not even close to anything like overheating, but then so far, I have only really been shooting stills with it. Start up time must be fine as I have not noticed anything other than it takes a second or so for the zoom to find it’s last setting, either; 28, 50 or 75mm as I have it set. Battery life excellent. I just came back from a week long trip to Scotland and shot well over 1000 frames and battery still showing 2 bars.
×
×
  • Create New...