Jump to content

17,183 topics in this forum

    • 4 replies
    • 358 views
    • 540 replies
    • 241.6k views
    • 31 replies
    • 31.2k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 1.7m views
    • 3 replies
    • 70 views
    • 21 replies
    • 580 views
    • 3 replies
    • 145 views
    • 3 replies
    • 182 views
    • 3 replies
    • 366 views
    • 456 replies
    • 102k views
    • 2 replies
    • 116 views
    • 5 replies
    • 632 views
    • 101 replies
    • 51.3k views
    • 1 reply
    • 403 views
    • 19 replies
    • 450 views
    • 700 replies
    • 271.8k views
  2. How to mount Isco

    • 3 replies
    • 560 views
    • 31 replies
    • 2.4k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 25 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 32 replies
    • 11.6k views
    • 9 replies
    • 822 views
    • 11 replies
    • 834 views
    • 32 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 355 views
    • 1 reply
    • 383 views
    • 16 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 16 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 355 views
    • 136 replies
    • 33.8k views
    • 243 replies
    • 132.3k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 6 replies
    • 779 views
    • 6 replies
    • 857 views
  3. The D-Mount project 1 2 3 4

    • 61 replies
    • 31k views
    • 64 replies
    • 31.9k views
    • 14 replies
    • 9.5k views
    • 5 replies
    • 667 views
    • 9 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 22 replies
    • 3.8k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.2k
    • Total Posts
      350.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,327
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    Bukletduemo
    Joined
  • Posts

    • "I think some of the faster sensor readouts are losing something important. They all look like 60p in their 24p modes."   probably this is why people complain about the clinical images of the latest crop of cinema cameras, the high res, plus the lack of motion blurs.  probably it is better to have 24p mode only in a camera. nowadays, high frame rate modes and 24p mode are in the same camera, not good for 24p optimization.  f35 has only 24p, its 60p is rarely used. probably this is why f35 is so good at motion cadence other than its global shutter.   
    • "The best motion cadence I've ever shot was on the Digital Bolex with the CCD sensor."   i wish i have a digital bolex. 
    • Well, with Venezuela.  As of now, there's minimal/no saber rattling with any of the other 11 other countries.
    • I think anyone can submit? Nikon probably curates the top ones based on social media reach. Honestly though it's not great. It isn't in the same league as a Panasonic Real Time LUT. All the processing seems to be in 8bit. I'll release what I've been working on soon but only when it can be made to look absolutely 100% right unlike the shitty shot above with its two green tones.
    • Motion cadence for me, is matching the target frame rate with the sensor and shutter speed-sensor interplay. It is also about rolling shutter vs global shutter as that plays into the look of motion. The less distortion or jello the better. I wish people would SHOW things again. Where are all the tests on the a9 III with global shutter showing what it's like in video mode at 24p vs the a1 II? I miss the Vimeo days of being able to compare with meaningful shots rather than the standard YouTube guff of a candle for low light, ridiculous whip pans for rolling shutter that nobody ever does in proper cinema, a model staring blankly at the camera for skin tones and a crazy underexposed shot with the shadows lifted until everything looks flat and dirty with no tonality - yeah that's a dynamic range test, sure. The best motion cadence I've ever shot was on the Digital Bolex with the CCD sensor. I think some of the faster sensor readouts are losing something important. They all look like 60p in their 24p modes. For 60p and 120p motion cadence has less meaning. Since there's no motion blur subtleties that need taking care of.
×
×
  • Create New...