Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,242 visits to this link)
17,284 topics in this forum
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 458.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 700 replies
- 304k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 748.8k views
-
- 1 reply
- 16 views
-
- 13 replies
- 644 views
-
- 120 replies
- 62.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 217 views
-
- 560 replies
- 257k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 104 views
-
- 2 replies
- 173 views
-
- 20 replies
- 966 views
-
- 57 replies
- 18.3k views
-
- 46 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 60 replies
- 19.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 653 views
-
- 126 replies
- 56.8k views
-
- 88 replies
- 57.6k views
-
- 71 replies
- 33.9k views
-
- 14 replies
- 785 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 10 replies
- 711 views
-
- 79 replies
- 55.1k views
-
- 26 replies
- 19.5k views
-
- 3 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 105 replies
- 42.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 418 views
-
- 15 replies
- 888 views
-
- 33 replies
- 6.4k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 528 views
-
- 4 replies
- 586 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 44 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 1 reply
- 420 views
-
- 56 replies
- 5.4k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.7k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
-
By zerocool22 · Posted
Hi, I am thinking if I need Ibis or not in my camera's. I think it introduces some kind of jitter when panning the camera or when on a gimbal doing slider movements.(even when ibis is turned off, the sensor might correct/wiggle). Anyhow it is driving me crazy. I see it on a lot of online videos as well, and they all say it is perfectly stable while it def is not. Or might be stable but there is some kind of jerking going around. I don't have an non ibis camera around that I can mount to a gimbal to compare directly (c500ii is too big). Can someone confirm this is the case? And this is the reason why there is no ibis on most cinema cameras, as the sensor will always be floaty? Thanks! -
Round 3. Changes include: More softening I'm currently aiming for a neg + print look, so that will be far softer than just a neg scan only. This is obviously adjustable to taste depending on what look I want. Grain is more saturated and with more blue and less red Grain engine completely rebuilt from scratch based on a grain-blur-grain-blur architecture More halation and bloom I think my previous versions were based on a 35mm preset where I adjusted the grain to 16mm but the halation and bloom were still at 35mm amounts - oops! I've applied it to some old images and some new ones. I have built a little set of S16 reference images from YT and also from PNGs people have sent me of S16 film scans, and in comparing these new grades I feel like these are closer but are in that strange space where they are too sharp and also too soft, where there's too much grain but not enough, etc. I suspect that either means these things are still missing the mark, or that there is so much variation in my references that I'm somewhere in the middle and therefore not close to the examples at the extremes. Feedback welcome... -
... Half of a grand looks like something to me: https://wondamobile.com/search?q=vivo+x300+ultra&_pos=1&_psq=viv&_ss=e&_v=1.0&type=product -
By Clark Nikolai · Posted
Good article. Interesting discussion of both the technical aspects as well as how they support the story. Thank you. At the bottom, the article shows the camera set ups in this image. https://www.afcinema.com/IMG/jpg/les_outils_du_tournage.jpg
-
