Jump to content

Subforums

  1. The EOSHD YouTube Channel   (24,014 visits to this link)

    Follow Andrew Reid on YouTube

17,324 topics in this forum

  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 2m views
    • 1.2k replies
    • 514.3k views
    • 706 replies
    • 335.7k views
    • 9.1k replies
    • 2.8m views
    • 0 replies
    • 2.5k views
  2. Panasonic GH6 1 2 3 4 88

    • 1.8k replies
    • 800.6k views
    • 26 replies
    • 787 views
    • 2 replies
    • 39 views
    • 2 replies
    • 37 views
    • 22 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 2 replies
    • 56 views
    • 74 replies
    • 12.3k views
    • 56 replies
    • 8.7k views
  3. The ARRI camera phone

    • 6 replies
    • 397 views
    • 5 replies
    • 267 views
    • 11 replies
    • 601 views
    • 5 replies
    • 942 views
    • 0 replies
    • 144 views
    • 3 replies
    • 804 views
    • 18 replies
    • 3.2k views
    • 32 replies
    • 3.4k views
  4. Nikon Zr is coming 1 2 3 4 26

    • 517 replies
    • 173.3k views
  5. Lumix S9 1 2 3 4 16

    • 315 replies
    • 150.2k views
    • 47 replies
    • 22.5k views
    • 4 replies
    • 1k views
    • 2 replies
    • 523 views
    • 109 replies
    • 47.3k views
    • 573 replies
    • 275.3k views
    • 13 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 92 replies
    • 15.8k views
    • 14 replies
    • 1.2k views
  6. My new lens?

    • 7 replies
    • 2.8k views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 14 replies
    • 3.2k views
    • 28 replies
    • 16k views
    • 24 replies
    • 3.8k views
    • 3 replies
    • 821 views
    • 74 replies
    • 9.1k views
    • 26 replies
    • 3.6k views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.2k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.3k
    • Total Posts
      352.5k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      35,651
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    heshosavo1981
    Joined
  • Posts

    • Good to know, i have gotten used to the peaking on the e-m1 iii. Occasionally  i can still mess it up however but most times it works ok and i have to add its not the camera, its me with my Goldilocks syndrome, it has to be just right... I presume that if i use a fast aperture then the corresponding zone of focus is narrower too for the peaking and with a wider aperture then the peaking occurs across a wider zone of focus thats my thinking, although i cant say i have ever seen anything on youtube to confirm or deny that.
    • I actually kinda like it. Don't think it needs it, but you could easily add some sprocket holes to one side and some hair/dust/grain and I think it would pass for a bad digital 8mm film look... the micro shakes just adds to it.   Could use those shots as transitions in your edits.
    • Hey Panny, hope all is well! Yeah that was shot on Arri LogC, but I have been kinda anti-log lately so the next time I take her out, I think I'm going to mess around with CineLikeD/V. Log is kinda boring and the noise in the shadows is just atrocious. I'm thinking of selling the GH6 and FP to fund a Nikon. N-Raw with SDR Tone sounds like an amazing concept to me. All of the benefits of raw and 12bit color with a rec709 picture profile like Nikon Flat or one of the new Red Picture Profiles really interests me.  That said, the GH6 is a great camera and overall I much prefer Arri LogC to vLog!
    • Take a better look at the video, Stephen, where the reviewer explains why this is actually an entirely new product concept... ; ) But let me answer you on this new one now: Have you ever been to a music concert with a camera in hands without being accredited as often happens but just not all the time? : ) Maybe not or perhaps you've already been asked to leave your telephoto zoom at the cloakroom, assuming there even was one... ;- ) Or then, going to the middle of the crowd with your gear after the first three songs... : X I bet you're able to pay for it in just a single gig! : P - EAG
    • Nothing new under the sun. Sony tried this concept 13 years ago with Sony DSC-QX100 and Sony DSC-QX10. It didn't work / sell well.  Maybe their implementation was not good, maybe smartphones were not fast enough or price was too high. I somehow doubt it will work now.   99.9 percent of the people are quite happy with the cameras on their smartphones. Those who want something more are a tiny minority and they have plenty of other toys to play with. So again I doubt this will sell. Same as those telephoto 300mm,400mm  and more add on lenses. Who the heck needs those ? Bird shooters, sports shooters ? They are a tiny minority of a tiny minority and they will buy a mirrorless camera for those tasks. Smartphone manufacturers will soon realize they waist time and money.  I am quite happy that we now have :     1. RAW video and basically great video IQ from smartphones with 3rd party applications     2. Finally one company broke the mold and produced a flagship smartphone with 35mm focal lenght main camera
×
×
  • Create New...