Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,685 visits to this link)
17,219 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.5m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 427.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 850 views
-
- 700 replies
- 286.3k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.7m views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 711.1k views
-
- 28 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 85 replies
- 7.3k views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 29 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 34 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 124 views
-
- 466 replies
- 121.6k views
-
- 3 replies
- 553 views
-
- 549 replies
- 248.2k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 19 replies
- 807 views
-
- 57 replies
- 5.3k views
-
- 67 replies
- 34.5k views
-
- 87 replies
- 63.8k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 560 views
-
- 10 replies
- 6.4k views
-
- 9 replies
- 807 views
-
- 1 reply
- 456 views
-
- 5 replies
- 6.5k views
-
- 55 replies
- 27.5k views
-
- 34 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 75 replies
- 50.9k views
-
- 3 replies
- 559 views
-
- 336 replies
- 122.6k views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 7 replies
- 11k views
-
- 0 replies
- 538 views
-
- 26 replies
- 11.2k views
-
- 104 replies
- 54.8k views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 92 replies
- 72.3k views
-
- 21 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 140 replies
- 41.1k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts351k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
I am planning to use it on my custom phone with a Linos Mevis c mount 16mm lens. But it will work also with a bigger sensor. In the past I have used super 8 babies on full frame with great results. -
Agreed. I felt the same about the G9II. Lowlight is good. Full frame cameras seem to just be INSANELY good. And seems like the crop of full frame cameras for the most part has been this way for the last few years. I owned the Nikon Z6 OG from 2020-2025. It has the same IMX410 sensor found in the Sony a7iii, Panasonic S5/S1/S5II/S5IIX. That sensor despite being used in 7 yr old bodies like the z6 or a7iii is great in lowlight, 12,800 ISO and 25,600 ISO never looked bad to me I used to push the z6 so hard with wedding films even dipping into 51,200 ISO and noise was always usable. I dabbled a bit with the G9II in January and lowlight seemed noticeably worse, but at the same time it wasn’t BAD per se and cleaned up well in post. Again I think it’s just that full frame cameras are insanely good. But then again so are crop sensors lol…I was just running some lowlight tests with my friends $649 Canon R50V. With some Denoise in Davinci resolve, 12,800 ISO looked great to my eye. Nuts! 12,800! $649 used to get me a Panasonic G7 and decent lens…how far all these cameras have come. I couldn’t dream of getting that type of result on the G7. But this $649 R50V was extremely impressive lol. We are so dang spoiled. I ended up getting a used canon r6 OG for a very good price ($929), overheating aside its a wonderful cam for $1k average. And looks great at ISO 25,600… I think my biggest isssue with the g9II was PDAF seemed to shut off or be used a lot less when above ISO 2500 or 3200 in a lot of cases. Meaning if you want to rely on autofocus it’s hard to really push things. Because I did find that with some Denoise ISO 6400 and 12,800 were honestly not bad. Maybe I also didn’t have the most optimal lens choices…but when I was recently filming at a summer camp where they had a canon r5 (so I could use the r5 when I wanted and my G9II when I wanted), the r5 seemed to wipe the floor with the g9II at 3200ISO and above especially when pushing things. And unfortunately I just seem to have times where I need to shoot in very very lowlight settings. So full frame is a big help. -
Nice! What formats and focal lengths is it compatible with? and what camera and taking lens combos are you planning to use with it? -
My take on the situation is that I'm super-happy with the GH7. It basically does everything I want, and apart from having ultra-sharp ultra-shallow DOF, pretty much does most things that FF does. It does low-light very well, and is only behind the low-light from FF cameras because they have gotten crazy good.
-
Yep that's the kind of intermediary codec that the ZR needs. But only if Nikon doesn't cook it with that aggressive noise reduction. You know the drill, Fuji had similar issues I seem to remember you pointing out. Thing is, I don't buy cameras based on promised or wishful features anymore. Been burned too many times waiting for "coming soon" updates that arrive late, incomplete, or not at all. So as of right now, the ZR is off the table for me. It's not just the codec situation though tbh, the unreliable view assist/exposure tools and first gen quirks also give me cold feet. Good to know LT is officially on the roadmap, though.. great for early adopters but I think I'm done gambling on "maybe later".
-
