Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,137 visits to this link)
17,274 topics in this forum
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.6m views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.8m views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 452.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 700 replies
- 298.8k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 738.9k views
-
- 12 replies
- 313 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 61 replies
- 32.2k views
-
- 9 replies
- 895 views
-
- 0 replies
- 205 views
-
- 4 replies
- 307 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1k views
-
- 44 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 217 views
-
- 56 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 309 views
-
- 14 replies
- 7.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 272 views
-
- 59 replies
- 18.3k views
-
- 32 replies
- 5.7k views
-
- 122 replies
- 23.8k views
-
- 10 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 5 replies
- 639 views
-
- 470 replies
- 136.9k views
-
- 16 replies
- 976 views
-
- 8 replies
- 706 views
-
- 27 replies
- 5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 372 views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 121 replies
- 54.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 4 replies
- 520 views
-
- 61 replies
- 9.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 447 views
-
- 1 reply
- 264 views
-
- 558 replies
- 254.5k views
-
- 3 replies
- 519 views
-
- 1 reply
- 440 views
-
- 5 replies
- 724 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts351.5k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By fuzzynormal · Posted
No doubt. I have a 5DMII that I think still delivers in this regard as well. What I have is good enough for me, so I've decide, "Eh, I'll stay where I'm at." (for now) 😉 -
TBH I never really noticed any improvement in the IBIS between the GH5 and GH7, although I didn't really use them that closely together so maybe I missed it. The IBIS (and Dual IS with compatible lenses) on all the MFT cameras I have is pretty incredible actually, GX85, GH5 and GH7. -
I'd add IBIS upgrades to Kye's list of improvements - as I normally shoot handheld, that's been my main reason to upgrade my M43 cameras over the years. I still own an original G9 (derived from the GH5), but the Oly E-M1 iii and OM-1 I bought more recently have better IBIS. Although I've been a faithful M43 user for about 15 years (starting with a Pana G3), due to the lack of a modern video-orientated small M43 camera I ventured into full-frame with an S9 recently (when the price dropped a lot). Now I've had enough time to get used to it, I have to say the video quality from it is noticeably better than the M43 cameras I own - it seems to have a 'richness' that is attractive. I usually put a Smallrig leather half-case and Sigma 18-50 F2.8 APS-C lens on it, and it's great as a run-and-gun camera (even though it's only using about half the sensor area in APS-C mode). -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
This is a real thing and a very good point. To give a personal and recent example, I was asked on Thursday of last week to jump in at the last minute to help finish someone's feature over the weekend. I'm not sure of the details for why their DP became unavailable. The filmmaker had a shot list for Saturday that was 15 pages long taking place in 7 different locations - and both I and the other guy they brought in had a hard out at 4 or 5 in the afternoon. Sunday's agenda was similar, but without either of us needing to leave. We didn't finish the list for either day. Likely, we'll be shooting again next Saturday. It was all outdoors in parks, usually a several hundred meters from our cars. None of our usual suspect gaffers were available/handy. We had basically 0 time to light things and the director wanted a bunch of wides and tracking shots (both tend to take longer to light). Controlling the light in any meaningful way was not a realistic option. These are exactly the situations when an extra stop of dynamic range is nice to have to keep the sky at least a bit blue, but yet also still have some detail in some of the harsh shadows. Real tough situation for the filmmaker - they definitely want to keep quality high and have they great ideas, but there are also budgetary and delivery date realities - the difference between a real indie film set and a reddit comments section. 😉 (Also, RIP colorist - there are like 5-6 different color profiles in play across all of the cameras that were used between the original DP and both of us last weekend, hopefully they only have to match 2 or 3 within any given scene) I'm not sure what ASA 50 has to do with needing extra light on a sunny day. Assuming ~24 fps, that'd give a proper exposure at approximately F/16 in bright sunlight (1/48 second for 180 shutter + sunny 16 rule indicating a 1/50 shutter speed = close enough) and you'd still need to use ND to open up the aperture beyond that. I suspect those lights are for filling in the faces/front of talent in a wide, given that the sun is actually at about a 60-90 degree angle from the lights (judging by shadows). From where the cameras are pointed, the subjects will be backlit. -
By Aussie Ash · Posted
colour movie film in the 1960s was only ASA 50 so they used extra lighting out doors on sunny days !! This is on set Hitchcocks "The Birds " 1963 with two carbon arc lights in the back ground now Fijifilm make a colour film rated at 1600 ISO (5 more stops beyond 50 ISO) and full frame sensors are way beyond the limitations of 50 ISO so yes it is far easier now !
-
