Jump to content

Subforums

  1. The EOSHD YouTube Channel   (23,525 visits to this link)

    Follow Andrew Reid on YouTube

17,301 topics in this forum

    • 701 replies
    • 314k views
    • 1.2k replies
    • 477.5k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 1.9m views
    • 9.1k replies
    • 2.7m views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.8k views
  2. Panasonic GH6 1 2 3 4 88

    • 1.8k replies
    • 771.5k views
    • 9 replies
    • 360 views
    • 565 replies
    • 266.2k views
    • 31 replies
    • 6.6k views
    • 61 replies
    • 20.6k views
    • 2 replies
    • 157 views
    • 4 replies
    • 392 views
    • 44 replies
    • 3.1k views
  3. DJI Pocket 3? 1 2 3 4 7

    • 129 replies
    • 64.2k views
    • 20 replies
    • 801 views
  4. new camera purchase 1 2 3 4 6

    • 106 replies
    • 78.3k views
    • 83 replies
    • 9.8k views
    • 60 replies
    • 6.3k views
    • 20 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 12 replies
    • 730 views
    • 6 replies
    • 3.4k views
    • 19 replies
    • 13k views
    • 24 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 9 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 1 reply
    • 637 views
    • 14 replies
    • 9k views
    • 49 replies
    • 4.1k views
    • 14 replies
    • 7.8k views
    • 2 replies
    • 507 views
    • 0 replies
    • 584 views
    • 11 replies
    • 2.4k views
    • 20 replies
    • 2k views
  5. Blazar anamorphics

    • 2 replies
    • 2.8k views
    • 121 replies
    • 67.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 610 views
    • 0 replies
    • 687 views
    • 0 replies
    • 702 views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 314 replies
    • 152.9k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.3k
    • Total Posts
      352k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,700
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    mensusa
    Joined
  • Posts

    • PS: That 600mm makes it interesting when/if will/would cost less than a grand... and mandatory then? OK, less than a grand and a half ! ; ) Anything other than lower than $2K would place it in a different range, for sure :- )   And not only for wild life...   Nonetheless. Disclaimer: FX30 + 16-300mm owner. Has the FX30 + 16-300mm killed the RX10 V? ; ) The FX30 gives you a cinema body: APS-C/Super 35, 10-bit 4:2:2, S-Log3, S-Cinetone, 14+ stops claimed latitude, 4K@120fps, active cooling/fan-cooled body, dual card slots, full-size HDMI, better rigging, better audio with the XLR handle, and interchangeable lenses. The RX10 V is now much stronger than the RX10 IV for video: 4K60, 4K120, 10-bit 4:2:2, S-Log3, S-Cinetone, LUT support, 4K30 USB streaming, and digital audio through the MI shoe. AI subject recognition (whatever this means...). But it has one SD slot, fixed lens, tilting rather than fully articulating screen, no IBIS, and is still more a high-end bridge/photo camera than a cinema tool. And I am far to be alone on this one: https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/cameras/sony-rx10-v-review   Sorry to be the party pooper but yes, the RX10 V has more reach (+33%), a brighter fixed zoom, an EVF and slightly less weight. The FX30 already gives you 24-450mm equivalent with that Sigma lens and everything up there plus interchangeable lenses for a similar price or even less.  
    • Looks like I came close-ish while overall being too optimistic (my guesses didn't feel all that optimistic?) and they exceeded in at least one way ((cropped) 4kp120).  Otherwise, yes, faster UHS-2 SD card (I think that's the second row of pins that I meant).  No CF Express, but memory stick is indeed gone.  No extra megapixels.  I didn't watch anything yet to see if 4k recording is now full sensor width vs slightly cropped or whether they support open gate - guessing no on open gate, at least, since it seems to be either the same sensor or a minor update to the same sensor.  I also mistyped the camera model on the USB port bit.  
    • Yes, I preferred it when it had the much shorter zoom. What was it? Something like 24-120 and constant aperture of f2.8 which on a 1” sensor was already borderline for me.
    • So basically a 1-inch video cam in a bridge body. Not so attractive to me. The previos 2.8 continuos lens of the OG and the II version of the same model truly gave it an original photo differentiator over Panny and Canon models Mercer mentioned. This newer model seems to be competing with Sony video cams.  I owned a Panny superzoom camera about 20 years ago and the 2.8 "beer can" zoom was a huge boon.
×
×
  • Create New...