Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (23,871 visits to this link)
17,313 topics in this forum
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.9m views
-
- 706 replies
- 329.3k views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 502.6k views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.8m views
-
- 0 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 791.2k views
-
- 8 replies
- 166 views
-
- 92 replies
- 13.6k views
-
- 107 replies
- 45.6k views
-
- 14 replies
- 540 views
-
- 572 replies
- 272.5k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 27 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 5 replies
- 846 views
-
- 14 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 505 replies
- 166.6k views
-
- 28 replies
- 15.1k views
-
- 24 replies
- 3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 478 views
-
Internal 32-bit float stereo paired with lossless 120mm reach from a 20mm lens — all inside a genuinely pocket-sized 10-bit 1-inch sensor gimbal camera? 1 2 3 4
- 74 replies
- 7.4k views
-
- 26 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 5 replies
- 800 views
-
- 1 reply
- 464 views
-
- 38 replies
- 4.6k views
-
- 29 replies
- 9.1k views
-
- 39 replies
- 17.4k views
-
- 17 replies
- 2k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 14 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 3 replies
- 870 views
-
- 1 reply
- 481 views
-
- 53 replies
- 6.9k views
-
- 62 replies
- 23k views
-
- 64 replies
- 9.9k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 108 replies
- 81.9k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 42 replies
- 12.4k views
-
- 31 replies
- 8k views
.thumb.jpg.dd92759bb2822fdc7e13dd70abd53569.jpg)
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.3k
-
Total Posts352.3k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
They're the only one that could make a sub $1000 full featured super 35 cine camera and refuse to do so. -
Yes, you should title them with as many poophemisms as you can find that sound like footage they’d like to steal. Building a log cabin Clearing the pipes Cutting a cigar Decorating the White House Downloading some software Feeding the fish Laying some cable Stocking the lake with brown trout Etc etc -
By MurtlandPhoto · Posted
Lately for really long recordings like conferences and lectures I’ve been transcoding the BRAW to h.265 with a conversion LUT and minimal CC, then editing from that. I delete the BRAW once I confirm nothing went wrong. Sure it adds a step, but it keeps my Pyxis in my normal rotation of jobs rather than just brought out for the “big” jobs. For really important shoots I still keep all the BRAW, though. -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
I'll be sure to fill up any cloud storage they give me, then. Maybe I could treat them to a retrospective of my year in toilet flushes, but give it a bunch of other labels like "Doing a sick jump on my bike" -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
No surprise at all that someone grabbed it. Too bad the mount can't be user-swapped - I saw one in a bit more beat up condition, but still good for like $1,000 - but with EF mount. It is bigger than H.265, but there's also not, in my experience, a lot of reason to fear some of the higher compression ratios. I think I see some artifacts in some difficult places (narrow/flaring highlights) 8K at 12:1 on the Ursa LF, but I need to try exporting from Resolve and/or try some similar scenes with 12:1, 8:1, and 5:1. I'm not sure how well ProRes 422 bitrates compare with higher-compression braw, but they might not be too far off. For now, for later, for just about forever if you want it to. That's a hell of a camera - though it'd be nice to have something a little smaller to pair with it. The C500 II ain't tiny (though it's also not enormous).
-
