Jump to content

17,179 topics in this forum

    • 2 replies
    • 160 views
    • 540 replies
    • 240.1k views
    • 31 replies
    • 29.4k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 1.7m views
    • 17 replies
    • 196 views
    • 10 replies
    • 208 views
    • 451 replies
    • 101k views
    • 700 replies
    • 271.2k views
  2. How to mount Isco

    • 3 replies
    • 393 views
    • 31 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 11 replies
    • 972 views
    • 0 replies
    • 147 views
    • 25 replies
    • 2k views
    • 32 replies
    • 11.4k views
    • 9 replies
    • 682 views
    • 0 replies
    • 147 views
    • 11 replies
    • 626 views
    • 32 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 2 replies
    • 312 views
    • 0 replies
    • 202 views
    • 1 reply
    • 231 views
    • 16 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 16 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 1 reply
    • 208 views
    • 136 replies
    • 33.4k views
    • 243 replies
    • 132k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 6 replies
    • 624 views
    • 6 replies
    • 712 views
  3. The D-Mount project 1 2 3 4

    • 61 replies
    • 30.7k views
    • 64 replies
    • 31.7k views
    • 14 replies
    • 9.3k views
    • 5 replies
    • 510 views
    • 9 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 22 replies
    • 3.5k views
    • 29 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 111 replies
    • 50.3k views
    • 13 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 7 replies
    • 1k views
  4. new camera purchase 1 2 3 4 5

    • 91 replies
    • 69.8k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.2k
    • Total Posts
      350.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,323
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    Theofanis
    Joined
  • Posts

    • This is my point. If a 20 year old varicam 27h can can do a lot that 35mm film rolls can do, the modern crop of mirrorless and cinema cams are much better, the gap between these new ones and the 35mm film rolls is really not that much, hard to justify the 100x cost and the much long time for processing.
    • The woman with bubbles at 1:00 or so or the sun behind the mountain at 1:50 or so are more challenging scenes than the baby and the rolloff in both looks really rough to me.   The image at 0:49 also looks pretty bad to me, as do the highlights in the water at 0:40ish. It's great for a camera from 20 or so years ago, but in modern terms, I'd expect better from any mid-tier hybrid.  Like with most things, in the hands of someone who knows what they're doing, it can look great - but so can a Nikon ZR or a Canon R6 III.  😃
    • seems that baby's chin area, the local dr is really high, yet the highlight rolloff seems nice by my eyes. the details in the highlight area still are kept. there is no clear dead white, no clipping on the right side of the histogram.    if this holds true, it is really hard to justify using alexa 35, or even 35mm film rolls. they may be even better in this situation, but 27h is good enough.   
    • I'm still waiting to hear from the big names about it... Guess we'll have a long wait for that. I think they're probably more tied up about being bought by a streamer, than they are about being bought by a fascist.
    • i think that baby's face is one of the challengest situations, dark shade, interwoven with the sunshine areas. this demonstrates that the 27h has some mojos.  my point is that the film rolls may have similar situation like the closing shop arri, 5% improvement vs 10-20 times cost. for the film rolls, the cost may be 100 times more, depending on the final feature's length.   
×
×
  • Create New...