Subforums
17,158 topics in this forum
-
- 538 replies
- 236k views
-
- 30 replies
- 28.6k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.6m views
-
- 2 replies
- 18.9k views
-
- 8 replies
- 432 views
-
- 411 replies
- 89.6k views
-
- 90 replies
- 28.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 93 views
-
- 7 replies
- 462 views
-
- 9 replies
- 420 views
-
- 109 replies
- 47.3k views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 91 replies
- 68.9k views
-
- 9 replies
- 467 views
-
- 0 replies
- 187 views
-
- 92 replies
- 33.2k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
-
Blackmagic brings genlock to the iPhone 17 Pro, while Apple’s first ProRes RAW goes straight to your pocket... 1 2 3
- 48 replies
- 21k views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 10 replies
- 929 views
-
- 8 replies
- 884 views
-
- 63 replies
- 30.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 578 views
-
- 10 replies
- 926 views
-
- 0 replies
- 503 views
-
- 241 replies
- 130.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 805 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 31 replies
- 3k views
-
- 32 replies
- 16.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 27 replies
- 33.4k views
-
- 192 replies
- 45.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 3.8k views
-
- 1 reply
- 790 views
-
- 10 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 681 replies
- 261.9k views
-
- 29 replies
- 27.7k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts349.9k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
It's quite easy to focus. Physically it's well damped and optically it's really sharp so the limitation is in how sharp the taking lens is and what sort of monitoring and peaking you have on the camera. Minimum FD is around 60-something cm, which I think is what the spec says. IIRC I tested it on the Voigt 17.5/0.95 and didn't really notice differences between that and other lenses, although I'm not doing much close up stuff. Yep, why stop down? 😄 Test shots here: More shots here: and here: The GH7 is a dream to use. The only "downsides" are it's not FF, it's physically large/heavy/chunky, it doesn't have a 1.25x anamorphic de-squeeze (so I use the 1.33x one which works fine), and the punch-in focus assist only goes to 6x. That's literally everything I can think of. That would only let me focus closer, wouldn't it? I don't find close focus to be an issue with it, just looking for something with shallower DOF. My Takumar 50mm F1.4 arrived today, so I'll be playing with that. -
Wait so Resolve can't export trimmed R3D NE clips?!! You have to transcode to h265 before editing?? If so that's a major issue. I don't understand the workaround of "edit your project straight from the CFExpress card"? As for h265 I think it mainly has to do with the super low variable bitrate which is probably to keep thermals under control, however according to Bloom's review the ProRes HQ displays similar softness which indicates the built-in NR is set way too high. Nikon needs to give ZR some NR settings to get detail back in compressed codecs. -
By John Matthews · Posted
What happens if you know the boat has a hole in it and you know it's going to sink if it's out there? This might be the more realistic situation for Panasonic. They have the camera, but does it make sense at the price they can make it for (and still make money)? Or, perhaps even more likely, they can make a few of these awesome cameras they've designed, but there are some sort of tooling or production issues that prevent making a lot of them at the right price. -
Almost all of entrepreneurs in silicon valley are fascist, some are dumb enough to reveal it at first stage, and some are smart enough to keep it in the closet until the time is right. When your mindset is wrapped by this self generated notion of "people are too imbecile to understand what we actually do everyday", the next step is to assume they're not qualified to govern themselves! Forget Trump, the bigger one is JD Vance. They're all members of tech bro club who think they know how to rule the world. By the way, BBC is known as a outright lier in my home country now. When I was a kid it was the only alternative source to absolute garbage propaganda of the state Radio/TV. We couldn't care about the integrity as much as we had thirst for "different voice". But after the internet revolution, everything changed. Not only it was easier to see how manipulative is their practice of so called journalism, but also was possible to research about their claims, their interviewed "experts", and even the statistics. But the most stab in the back move was giving the mic to hardliner individuals, or their advocates, with this silly justification of "giving both side the chance to express themselves to let people decide themselves". I don't need to hear Bin Laden's side you assholes. Or "former" ISIS members. Or "current" Hamas member, or an orthodox settler that even IDF is struggling with. I know what's their narrative. Just tell me what they've done. As a UK taxpayer you may not very well informed about the damage BBC caused outside the west. They sometimes pushes the narrative of a Washington DC based think tank that is literally a branch of Qatar/Iran/Syria/Russia/Saudi foreign ministry, despite all these criminals call BBC the "Zionist mouth". Its a long sad story with tons of nuances that a camera oriented forum is not a right place to expand. -
By fuzzynormal · Posted
Ha! Ans it's said one is supposed to get more conservative as they get older. For me, I just can't shake capital being the vehicle for fascism. Souped up and hot-rodded to fly down the drag strip. And, yeah, since pseudo-capitalism is now global and we're on the verge on climate collapse? Woo boy. Buckle up. Yup, sure is hard not to be conspiratorial about it all. As someone once said, have a nice day "you fucking dumbasses" 😉
-
