Subforums
-
The EOSHD YouTube Channel (22,324 visits to this link)
-
- 57
- posts
17,183 topics in this forum
-
- 4 replies
- 368 views
-
- 540 replies
- 241.6k views
-
- 31 replies
- 31.2k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.7m views
-
- 25 replies
- 641 views
-
- 4 replies
- 204 views
-
- 8 replies
- 394 views
-
- 457 replies
- 102.1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 90 views
-
- 3 replies
- 151 views
-
- 2 replies
- 125 views
-
- 5 replies
- 636 views
-
- 101 replies
- 51.3k views
-
- 1 reply
- 412 views
-
- 19 replies
- 462 views
-
- 700 replies
- 271.9k views
-
- 3 replies
- 562 views
-
- 31 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 25 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 32 replies
- 11.6k views
-
- 9 replies
- 825 views
-
- 11 replies
- 841 views
-
- 32 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 360 views
-
- 1 reply
- 385 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 361 views
-
- 136 replies
- 33.8k views
-
- 243 replies
- 132.3k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 781 views
-
- 6 replies
- 859 views
-
- 61 replies
- 31k views
-
- 64 replies
- 31.9k views
-
- 14 replies
- 9.5k views
-
- 5 replies
- 669 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 22 replies
- 3.8k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts350.3k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
The canal is not in South America. It's in Central America which is considered to be part of the North American continent. There's basically no part of South America where a canal would make any sense. As far as oil, I wouldn't be surprised if we decided to take a real interest in Guyana, given the recent coastal oil discoveries there. Brazil's oil is already more or less in the hands of multinational companies. For minerals, I'm sort of surprised that we haven't taken a more active interest in Bolivia's lithium reserves, but I suppose that Chile and Argentina have both commercialized their adjacent ones enough to sate our appetites for the time being. -
By newfoundmass · Posted
I think there are reasons for even video folks to choose the A7V over the FX2. It's interesting, because they could put that A7V sensor into a cine camera body and mark it up $500-800 and have a successful release. Maybe they still will? Still makes the FX2 feel like a weird release that, even if it hadn't received a lukewarm reception, they undermined almost immediately. Almost feels like one hand doesn't know what the other is doing at Sony. -
By Andrew Reid · Posted
Are you talking about the US or Venezuela? 🙂 -
By Andrew Reid · Posted
By the way the collapse in price of the vintage stuff is extraordinary, you can get an Iscorama close to 500 euros now, almost back to 2010 pre-DSLR video prices -
By Andrew Reid · Posted
Yeah, thanks this shot is exactly what I'm talking about - the muted way it handles the sun is not what a good cinema anamorphic should look like. They don't have the big stretched ovals in the horizontal flare, the fatter flare lines and blooming. All these kids putting down pretty significant $$$$ for all this sterile stuff from China No question is it more practical though.... But better image it ain't 🙂
-
