Jump to content

Subforums

  1. The EOSHD YouTube Channel   (23,655 visits to this link)

    Follow Andrew Reid on YouTube

17,305 topics in this forum

    • 706 replies
    • 320.1k views
    • 1.2k replies
    • 488.3k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 1.9m views
    • 9.1k replies
    • 2.8m views
    • 0 replies
    • 2k views
  2. Panasonic GH6 1 2 3 4 88

    • 1.8k replies
    • 781.4k views
    • 62 replies
    • 7.9k views
    • 57 replies
    • 4.7k views
  3. LOFIC sensors are the future...

    • 12 replies
    • 531 views
    • 8 replies
    • 458 views
    • 567 replies
    • 268.7k views
    • 5 replies
    • 565 views
  4. Sony FX5 1 2

    • 30 replies
    • 2.1k views
  5. Nikon Zr is coming 1 2 3 4 24

    • 472 replies
    • 158.1k views
    • 4 replies
    • 575 views
    • 7 replies
    • 794 views
  6. new camera purchase 1 2 3 4 6

    • 108 replies
    • 80.1k views
    • 12 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 24 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 42 replies
    • 11.4k views
    • 31 replies
    • 7.3k views
    • 61 replies
    • 21.6k views
    • 4 replies
    • 899 views
  7. DJI Pocket 3? 1 2 3 4 7

    • 129 replies
    • 66.7k views
    • 83 replies
    • 11.3k views
    • 20 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 12 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 6 replies
    • 3.8k views
    • 19 replies
    • 13.6k views
    • 24 replies
    • 2.5k views
    • 9 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 11 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
    • 14 replies
    • 9.4k views
    • 49 replies
    • 5.3k views
    • 14 replies
    • 8.6k views
    • 2 replies
    • 882 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 11 replies
    • 2.8k views
    • 20 replies
    • 2.6k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.3k
    • Total Posts
      352.1k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,970
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    isronteno1985
    Joined
  • Posts

    • I was very impressed with the results I saw from various people testing it.  The GH7 sensor is good, the lens in the L10 is also good, and V-LOG and the codecs available are more than enough, so it should be a great combo. In terms of the lack of IBIS, that's definitely a thing, but if you're able to steady it with almost anything (tripod, gimbal, monopod, even just a large handle of some kind) then it should be pretty stable.
    • One has 16 stops of DR (or 17.2 with SNR=2) with little if any NR, and the other has so much NR that the DR is measured as 13 stops for both SNR=1 and SNR=2, which is a completely ridiculous result. One has 10+ stops of latitude and the other has something like 4-5 stops of latitude. Considering that the primary purpose of these cameras is to shoot wide scenes in uncontrolled situations, DR is always a major challenge.  NR is normally the issue with cameras like this too, and one has results that are remarkably good for cameras of any price, and the other is remarkable for how heavy the NR is. When the one that scores better in all of the above is the cheaper one, that's also saying something. I don't think that "completely and utterly" is overselling it at all. Hey, if someone else wants to publish lab tests on these things then I'll link to them instead. Unless you think they're lying about the lab test results, then the discussion is normally better when it involves actual objective measurements than if it doesn't involve any at all.   I'm not saying that measurements are the only thing that matters, but if you're comparing two cameras that have a difference in performance of 4 stops then that's an incredible amount and when shooting outside in available light on wide angle lenses then that is something that really matters in real-world situations.
    • The CineD lab tests disagree with you about there being NR.  Below I have linked to where they talk about NR test results and they say "very little if any noise reduction" (linked to timestamp): I believe your impressions about how the final images look, but Nr can happen anywhere in the pipeline, so maybe it was something done elsewhere in the process?  YouTube compression is absolutely brutal on grain, acting as a pretty serious form of NR that is applied to every upload, so maybe that's part of what you're seeing too?
    • Unfortunately, not everyone cares. - EAG :- )
    • No, I have only viewed DJI's and various youtubers' material of the Pocket 4P. I assume everyone will use settings that will make the footage look its best as they would for their normal work, what would be the point of using settings that produce subideal results? Some of the youtubers did mention tweaking the settings to their preferences. A lot of cameras don't have any settings that would reduce noise reduction of their video files to zero, I would not be surprised if this is the case here as well.  
×
×
  • Create New...