Jump to content

17,168 topics in this forum

    • 539 replies
    • 238.5k views
    • 30 replies
    • 29k views
  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 289

    • 5.8k replies
    • 1.6m views
    • 2 replies
    • 19k views
    • 15 replies
    • 841 views
    • 10 replies
    • 819 views
    • 439 replies
    • 96.9k views
    • 0 replies
    • 61 views
  2. How to mount Isco

    • 0 replies
    • 39 views
    • 126 replies
    • 31.5k views
    • 4 replies
    • 345 views
    • 694 replies
    • 266.6k views
    • 6 replies
    • 402 views
    • 6 replies
    • 558 views
    • 15 replies
    • 771 views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.3k views
  3. The D-Mount project 1 2 3 4

    • 61 replies
    • 30.1k views
    • 64 replies
    • 31.2k views
    • 12 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 14 replies
    • 9k views
    • 5 replies
    • 358 views
    • 9 replies
    • 923 views
    • 22 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 29 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 111 replies
    • 49.2k views
    • 242 replies
    • 131.3k views
    • 13 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 7 replies
    • 874 views
  4. new camera purchase 1 2 3 4 5

    • 91 replies
    • 69.5k views
    • 9 replies
    • 725 views
    • 0 replies
    • 373 views
    • 92 replies
    • 34k views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 48 replies
    • 23.6k views
    • 25 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 10 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 8 replies
    • 1.1k views
  5. Lumix flow

    • 4 replies
    • 772 views
    • 10 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 709 views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      17.2k
    • Total Posts
      350.1k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,315
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    KnutL
    Joined
  • Posts

    • I think it CAN be the most important choice for SOME films, but for MOST films, I genuinely think it matters less now than ever before. I'm not going to say that the ARRI Alexis 35 doesn't have a place and that everything can just be shot on a GH7 or FX3, because that's not true at all either. But how many of them could have been shot on something else and not been any worse for the wear? One of my favorite films of the year is "The Long Walk." It's shot on the ARRI Alexa 35 with Panavision anamorphics (just like the much uglier "Terrifier 3" I mentioned in a previous post!) and looks very good. But if you had switched that ARRI Alexa out for something else, I don't think it'd have had any impact on the film because the acting and story was that good and was what stood out the most about the film. That's not a reason to NOT to film with an ARRI, but it's an example of how less important it is today than ever before. "28 Years Later" is one of the highest grossing films of the year and was shot on an iPhone. Can anyone honestly say that it would've been more successful, financially or artistically, if it'd been shot on an ARRI? Probably not. Conversely, you can't really say that "The Conjuring: Last Rites" would have been less successful if it had been shot on something other than an ARRI, say a PYXIS or lower end Sony. 
    • Hey Andrew, how about this one? Would be quite the deal if it could be fixed. Camera is about an hour from me so I am tempted to experiment. Otherwise an expensive paperweight. Salt water damage is probably up there with one of the worst things to do dona camera.         
    • I'd lime to know why the GH7 was used for this particular movie/documentary. Practical reasons regarding size? Cost? Absolute technical image quality? We just don't know. I also think camera choice is the most important reason any creator is going to make, aside from script. If the piece doesn't look right no one will watch it, even if it's Citizen Kane Part Deux. That's why some Hollywood creative trios are almost set in stone: director-writer-photographer.  If I go to an IMAX I expect to see something spectacular. If I go to the cinema for an indie doc, my expectation changes. If I turn on my TV and watch channel 6 I pretty much expect soap opera visuals.  
    • Finally someone used trees as resolution test chart instead of his own face
    • GH5 GH4 EM10iii OM-1 5Dii XPRO2 XT-5 P1100 DSC-RX10 iPhone15 iPhone12 Xiaomi12 Ultra DJI Mavic Pro GoPro Hero All those different cameras were used to make our latest indy documentary on-and-off over the last 3 years.  We finally finished post-production (for real this time) last month.  Not to mention all the different ridiculous vintage lenses and modern lenses employed along the way.  So that happened.   My advice?  Yeah, don't use so many cameras...and then try to make all that cohere somehow with no legitimate color grading skills... Surprisingly, I found the EM10iii footage the most pleasant looking color-wise when exposed correctly.
×
×
  • Create New...