Subforums
17,077 topics in this forum
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.4m views
-
- 517 replies
- 160.9k views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 10.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 71 views
-
- 8 replies
- 344 views
-
- 25 replies
- 868 views
-
- 756 replies
- 162.5k views
-
- 38 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 11 replies
- 404 views
-
- 0 replies
- 171 views
-
- 64 replies
- 7.2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 227 replies
- 83.4k views
-
- 23 replies
- 4.9k views
-
Grant Petty on the future of DaVinci Resolve Studio pricing: "We'll probably eventually charge some kind of upgrade for this." 1 2
- 20 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 35 replies
- 6.3k views
-
- 12 replies
- 746 views
-
- 2 replies
- 330 views
-
Anyone with a Panasonic S5 II or S9 interested in testing my in-cam ARRI compatible LOG C3 profile? 1 2
- 25 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 616 views
-
- 14 replies
- 865 views
-
- 163 replies
- 7.1k views
-
- 56 replies
- 8k views
-
- 6 replies
- 873 views
-
- 605 replies
- 36.8k views
-
- 69 replies
- 4.8k views
-
- 55 replies
- 6.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 407 views
-
- 45 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 4 replies
- 564 views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 85 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 13 replies
- 675 views
-
- 62 replies
- 13.5k views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 14 replies
- 11.5k views
-
Ursa Cine 12K now available as camera body only with option for recording to dual CF Express for only $7,000 1 2
- 31 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 15 replies
- 1.9k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.1k
-
Total Posts347.2k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
-
A7iv IMO might be a better hybrid unless prioritising low light video over stills? Tamron 20-40 + 28-75 + 70-180 would make a pretty sweet 3x compact zoom set up. I know this because it was my set up last year for stills and is again for this year. Next year, pretty sure I will trade the 28-75 and 70-180 for the new boy 50-150 f2, both for the convenience and extra stop, albeit sacrificing a bit of reach. But then with my A7Rv I can crop quite hard if required. Personally, I’d go for an A7Rv over an A7iv as it’s a better camera pretty much every department, but A7iv’s are cheaper. All this stuff is available used of course. -
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
Davide is 100% correct. Pair that GH7 with one of the cheap Panasonic/Olympus kit servo zooms and you have a tiny camera that works great for street work. Or bring the Olympus 12-100 if you're willing to tolerate the extra weight. Add a couple of fast primes for shooting at night and you have a fantastic usable kit. Otherwise, if you just can't stomach micro 4/3 for... some reason, there's nothing wrong with the A7S III. If light weight is a concern, I'd swap for the f/4 versions of both lenses. You'll still be able to get pretty nice shallow DOF and the lenses will be substantially smaller/lighter. Plus if you're shooting on the street in some of the cities, having smaller lenses won't be shouting "rob me" as loudly as a big white f/2.8 70-200, for example. I'd also give serious consideration to super 35. Fuji has a lot of great options and Sony has the FX30 (or whatever the non-cinema camera version of that is - A6700? Something like that?). -
-
