Jump to content
sanveer

GH5 Prototype

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, sanveer said:

I believe he said it will be introduced in the 1st Quarter of 2017. So about 6 months or (much) less. I hope the option to have IBIS On and Off is an option, especially considering the recording time, the noise picked up by the on-board mic etc etc

I think he said first half of 2017 but we could get lucky. It's just that when they give these sorts of estimates it usually ends up shipping right at the end. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

No IBIS. No PADF. 

Does a nice job of filling the spec sheet though, looking forward to footage ... sometime next year.

Despite the impressive spec, leaving out IBIS and PADF may make this a non-starter for me.

Lets see what Olympus drops with the EM1mmkII

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, resso said:

panasonic_gh5_hands_on_photos_14.jpg

2-ch xlr input hotshoe

Whoa !!! Where did you get this pic from? Is it for real? Have Panasonic REALLY listened to smart users, instead to fools who were praising the Brick Yaaaaagggghhh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, sanveer said:

Whoa !!! Where did you get this pic from? Is it for real? Have Panasonic REALLY listened to smart users, instead to fools who were praising the Brick Yaaaaagggghhh

Rogers urls above

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Chris said:

No IBIS. No PADF. 

They really only highlighted specs that aren't in any other Lumix camera at the moment. IBIS very likely falls under the "And more..." category.

I would like to see better AF performance in video though, at least on a par with what's already in the DVX200.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Mckinise said:

Pre-orders for the GH5?  I see links for the other 3 cameras, but not it.

Yes, at cyberphoto.se
No idea about other countries.

That XLR-thing made it a bit more interesting. But now I can only think about the new MF Fuji and hoping it will be within a reasonable budget for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is depressing reading on other places on the internet how quick the anti-MFT trolls are out, and of course their first red herring is "but it sucks at low light".

This low light argument reminds me of the megapixel race, sure there was big benefits from going from 2 megapixels to 5 megapixels, 12 megapixels, but then at around 16 megapixels to 24 megapixels range... the arguments got a *lot* weaker. And for 99.9% of users we don't need 50 megapixels!Ditto low light, not being constrained by 50 ISO film is *AWESOME*, then getting to 200 ISO... great! And now we can do workable 800 and 1600 and even 3200 ISO!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyeKIOV-EZw

Let's assume GH5 carries on and is one stop better even than that? How is that not a very workable ability to handle?

Do we NEED to have clean 100,00 ISO?? Nah, that is over the top in nearly all cases. 

I'd rather pass on the unnecessary over the top extreme high ISO capabilities and have instead the well polished and extensive range of features that the GH5 will have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...