Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 849
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I think the main problem coming from these videos is that 90% are made from photographers that have limited understanding of video work. They think IBIS is a gimbal replacement or some sort of steady

I can see why he needs raw, wb is totally off 😄

Posted Images

18 hours ago, sanveer said:

If one were go have 2 distinct camera bodies (and 2 completely different mounts too?) for videos and photo, it wouldn't really be a hybrid camera, would it? 

A camera doesn't have to be equally good at both stills and video to be a "hybrid"

There is for instance the Nikon D750 which was an amazing stills camera, and while the video side was "good", it wasn't anywhere near at the same level. 

Likewise the Panasonic S1H has amazing video capabilities as "the best in the world" for a hybrid camera, its stills performance is "good" but isn't at #1 however. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, IronFilm said:

A camera doesn't have to be equally good at both stills and video to be a "hybrid"

There is for instance the Nikon D750 which was an amazing stills camera, and while the video side was "good", it wasn't anywhere near at the same level. 

Likewise the Panasonic S1H has amazing video capabilities as "the best in the world" for a hybrid camera, its stills performance is "good" but isn't at #1 however. 

Exactly my approach on P4K, I use it as my finest hybrid, go figure! LOL True : -)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Administrators

Yeah possible, just needs a manufacturer to get them made... I have plenty of manual focus E-mount lenses (Voigtlander, Mitakon, etc.) and adapters, that I'd like to use on X-T3 / X-T4.

I reckon demand would be there.

Anybody have a CNC machine in their garage? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Andrew Reid said:

Anybody have a CNC machine in their garage? :)

Well, I could try to dare one of my friends to do it.. 

No promises he gets it done, though. 

EDIT:// MFT -> Fuji X seems doable, whereas Sony E -> Fuji X would require a whole lot of magic to produce. The flange distance difference between these two mounts is only 0.3 mm.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, heart0less said:

Well, I could try to dare one of my friends to do it.. 

No promises he gets it done, though. 

EDIT:// MFT -> Fuji X seems doable, whereas Sony E -> Fuji X would require a whole lot of magic to produce. The flange distance difference between these two mounts is only 0.3 mm.. 

Doc, my friend, you'll have all my admiration other than the usual one I already have if you'll put some additional service on my recent Sirui 50mm f/1.8 acquisition soon to come on MFT mount towards to my next camera purchase... LOL ; -)

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, androidlad said:

Old news by now, but just to let everybody know, X-T4 uses a new battery NP-W235, likely to be 2350mAh (compared to X-T3 W126S 1260mAh).

It is good news of course but watch this space when people start complaining that the camera is too big now  :) Fujirumors , which is the defacto site for official fuji leaks is adamant that this is not the X-H2 and X-T combined and that the two lines (X-T and X-H) will remain separate, but it sure looks like a good effort  for a new X-H2. Androidlad do we have any idea about the bitrate used. Will its still be Hevc at 400mbps ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...