Subforums
17,152 topics in this forum
-
- 30 replies
- 28.5k views
-
- 537 replies
- 235k views
-
- 5.8k replies
- 1.6m views
-
- 2 replies
- 18.9k views
-
- 400 replies
- 86.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 124 views
-
- 0 replies
- 35 views
-
- 69 replies
- 26.4k views
-
- 92 replies
- 32.8k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.1k views
-
Blackmagic brings genlock to the iPhone 17 Pro, while Apple’s first ProRes RAW goes straight to your pocket... 1 2 3
- 48 replies
- 19.9k views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 10 replies
- 820 views
-
- 8 replies
- 731 views
-
- 63 replies
- 30.1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 489 views
-
- 10 replies
- 802 views
-
- 0 replies
- 407 views
-
- 241 replies
- 130k views
-
- 3 replies
- 725 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 31 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 32 replies
- 16k views
-
- 3 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 27 replies
- 32.8k views
-
- 192 replies
- 45.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 3.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 716 views
-
- 10 replies
- 6.4k views
-
- 681 replies
- 259.9k views
-
- 90 replies
- 68.5k views
-
- 29 replies
- 27.2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 4.6k views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2.3m views
-
- 83 replies
- 59.4k views
-
- 15 replies
- 6.2k views
-
- 123 replies
- 77.4k views
-
- 66 replies
- 43.5k views
-
Grant Petty on the future of DaVinci Resolve Studio pricing: "We'll probably eventually charge some kind of upgrade for this." 1 2
- 26 replies
- 27.5k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.2k
-
Total Posts349.8k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
Finally got ZR yesterday. After changing all the settings like I have them in Z6iii, except Zebras and Vignette for R3D, got to test it a bit too. 1st, the screen is really good, you can change almost everything needed via the touch id and new menus quite quickly and intuitively. Need to figure out still what I need to set on those 4 custom buttons really. The grip is tiny but feels ok in the hand. Still, with heavier lenses like 1kg 50 f1.2 and 135 f1.8 having the L shaped gage’s bigger grip seems to be a must, as it also has the Arca-swizz base plate for easy tripod use too. Quickly tested R3D NE vs NRaw to R3D hack with ISO 800 and 6400, and R3D NE was a bit cleaner in the shadows and seemed to hold the colors better too. The Z6iii EVF and all of it’s buttons in muscle memory seems still of course more convenient to use, but there is no going back to timy 3.2” screens after this. In various Panas and Z6iii I almost never used the screen. Cinema tools has made a false color LUT, propably have to buy and try that too, if setting the zebras to 245 for R3D highlights does not work like zebras at 255 for NRaw. The build quality seemed robust, but the shutter button needs a bit heavier press. Could not find the focus limiter in the menus either. Hopefully the weather allows to take both ZR and Z6iii outside, and see how the ZR handles, and what the footage looks like. -
By Ilkka Nissila · Posted
I think the mechanical systems that allow the back LCD to tilt behind the optical axis as well as opening to the left for selfie orientation are more complicated and require more parts than what Nikon is using in the ZR, and this would make the camera heavier, larger, and more expensive (would make it less attractive for many people, and it might not solve the problem it currently solves). Higher-end models will no doubt be made over time with different solutions to how the LCD turns into different orientations. The Z8 and Z9 offer a screen which does not tilt forwards (selfie orientation) but it does retain the LCD approximately on the optical axis. -
By Ilkka Nissila · Posted
I could never understand the "accelerated" manual focusing, it makes things just more difficult and unpredictable. Nikon fortunately have firmware updates to most of the S-line lenses (exception: 14-24/2.8) that feature what people call linear manual focusing (I'm not really sure what is linear in it, what it does is make focus ring position and focus distance correspond to each other in a bijective relationship at least within the power cycle of the camera). What's even nicer is that you can choose how much you have to turn to achieve a given focus change, so it is adoptable for different users and needs. I think the focus by wire should never have been accelerated by default in any lens. As for the priority on autofocus, mirrorless so-called hybrid cameras and their lenses are a bit more (still) photography-oriented than video, and so the needs of the stills shooters come first in most models. Autofocus is very useful when you want consistent focus on the eye, for example, or when shooting action subjects (again, stills). For some things (such as when multiple subjects at different distances have to be sharp in the frame, and the best way to achieve this is to focus in between them) manual focus is better but manufacturers chose to prioritize ease of use than the needs of skilled users. Lenses with mechanical manual focus are of course available, natively and via adapters, for those who prioritise MF. -
at certain point, the lens industry is more for other things than the iq. canon l lenses are a good example, dust free, build quality (fine for me on this), af, optical is (fine for me in certain situations). they are working horses, but not creative tools. use another example, vintage voigtlander heliar lenses are so good for portrait. not sharp, but good enough, great oof, just right on the spot for human faces, even better in bw. even 50 years ago, they did it right. -
If only they had opted for the S1H/S1RII/A7RV style mech 🙈 It’s not a dealbreaker (for me) but might just have sealed the deal for me as this kind of fundamental, but so easily could have been included. I work exclusively off the LCD for both photo & video and simply prefer it behind the camera, in line with the lens and not on top or off to one side.
-
