DBounce 1,273 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 11 minutes ago, Orangenz said: Lovely 6K anamorphic. Makes my 4K screen feel small. 6k? Then talk of lower resolution is premature, as this image would likely be downsampled to 6k. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JordanWright 318 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 3328x2496 I assume was the capture resolution + the 2x desqueeze Orangenz 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DBounce 1,273 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 7 hours ago, JordanWright said: Yeah I still think it could possibly be a paid hardware/firmware upgrade or an add-on to enable more features Yes, it’s feeling a bit like this might be the case. And if so my wallet thanks you Panasonic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mercer 4,153 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 I think @jonpais already made the astute point that if this is merely a firmware update, then Panasonic physically sent it with a bottle of red paint to touch up the body... jonpais and anonim 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jonpais 0 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 @mercer Meanwhile, B&H is on backorder... ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DBounce 1,273 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 1 hour ago, mercer said: I think @jonpais already made the astute point that if this is merely a firmware update, then Panasonic physically sent it with a bottle of red paint to touch up the body... Yes, but some have speculated that the red button is actually a button enhancer, that is readily available online. They postulated that it is on the camera as he is wearing gloves. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jonesy Jones 0 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 1 hour ago, DBounce said: Yes, but some have speculated that the red button is actually a button enhancer, that is readily available online. They postulated that it is on the camera as he is wearing gloves. Then why would he photoshop it out? Anyway, if you look at Luke's video..... no red button. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PannySVHS 925 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 One thing is the heavy lens. Luk stated its weight of about 5 pounds. It looks to be mounted without any lens support, which would be a statement to the strength of the camera mount, even moreso since an additional adapter has to be mounted as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kaylee 1,325 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Katrikura and EthanAlexander 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Orangenz 415 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 3 hours ago, Jonesy Jones said: Then why would he photoshop it out? Anyway, if you look at Luke's video..... no red button. And yet every GH5 has a red dot on the button which you can't see either... in that shot... Anyway, on something completely different, has anyone seen my black marker pen? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neumann Films 132 Posted November 29, 2017 Author Share Posted November 29, 2017 Me thinks you guys are looking for the wrong things here. It's mildly comical ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Orangenz 415 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 7 minutes ago, Neumann Films said: Me thinks you guys are looking for the wrong things here. It's mildly comical ? I'm just going with the flow with the hope you find it entertaining. :D It's something with the tripod isn't it? What I can't work out is how you point the camera at the robot, with the sun apparently behind his head, without lighting, and yet his face is lit up like crazy with no noise. Neumann Films 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
IronFilm 4,026 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 5 hours ago, Jonesy Jones said: Then why would he photoshop it out? To fvck with our heads and stir the pot? :-P ha 1 hour ago, Orangenz said: What I can't work out is how you point the camera at the robot, with the sun apparently behind his head, without lighting, and yet his face is lit up like crazy with no noise. it is a new Panasonic Lens Filter that bounces light back! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kaylee 1,325 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 @Neumann Films just tell us Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Cinegain 2,169 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Oh, I get it now, so... there's an XLR hotshoe adapter, without any cables running into it. It is... because the 2nd gen XLR hotshoe adapter... doubles as A RAW RECORDER !1!! It takes the signal from the hotshoe interface! Incl. Dolby Atmos audio from the onboard mic they've added to the XLR unit (Vesku...). Dúh. And RAW has 3 straight elements in the 'R', the 2nd letter 'A' has 3 as well, 3+3=6, more so: the W of course has 3 peaks at the top and 2 at the bottom, 3*2 is 6. And RAW is three letters, so 666. Illuminati* confirmed! *Illuminati is a Panasonic trademark, all rights reserved EthanAlexander, Liszon, IronFilm and 1 other 1 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Liszon 98 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Yeah, I've been magnifying the crap out of the XLR module too, I think I can see Rick Astley in there.. Neumann Films, Orangenz, Cinegain and 2 others 3 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DBounce 1,273 Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Are the bts shots also done with the new camera? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Orangenz 415 Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 4 minutes ago, DBounce said: Are the bts shots also done with the new camera? GH5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neumann Films 132 Posted December 1, 2017 Author Share Posted December 1, 2017 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jonesy Jones 0 Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 Another stunning image Luke. Everything about these images is so creamy. I'm guessing it has something to do with the cheap lens you used. What else is interesting is that the last dimensions were 6656x2496. This one is 3840x1440. An exact proportional decrease by a factor of 1.733333. Any reason for that? That's an odd resolution shift. I dunno. It's late. Maybe I'm missing something simple. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.