DBounce Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 11 minutes ago, Orangenz said: Lovely 6K anamorphic. Makes my 4K screen feel small. 6k? Then talk of lower resolution is premature, as this image would likely be downsampled to 6k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JordanWright Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 3328x2496 I assume was the capture resolution + the 2x desqueeze Orangenz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBounce Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 7 hours ago, JordanWright said: Yeah I still think it could possibly be a paid hardware/firmware upgrade or an add-on to enable more features Yes, it’s feeling a bit like this might be the case. And if so my wallet thanks you Panasonic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 I think @jonpais already made the astute point that if this is merely a firmware update, then Panasonic physically sent it with a bottle of red paint to touch up the body... jonpais and anonim 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonpais Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 @mercer Meanwhile, B&H is on backorder... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBounce Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 1 hour ago, mercer said: I think @jonpais already made the astute point that if this is merely a firmware update, then Panasonic physically sent it with a bottle of red paint to touch up the body... Yes, but some have speculated that the red button is actually a button enhancer, that is readily available online. They postulated that it is on the camera as he is wearing gloves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 1 hour ago, DBounce said: Yes, but some have speculated that the red button is actually a button enhancer, that is readily available online. They postulated that it is on the camera as he is wearing gloves. Then why would he photoshop it out? Anyway, if you look at Luke's video..... no red button. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PannySVHS Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 One thing is the heavy lens. Luk stated its weight of about 5 pounds. It looks to be mounted without any lens support, which would be a statement to the strength of the camera mount, even moreso since an additional adapter has to be mounted as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaylee Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Katrikura and EthanAlexander 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangenz Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 3 hours ago, Jonesy Jones said: Then why would he photoshop it out? Anyway, if you look at Luke's video..... no red button. And yet every GH5 has a red dot on the button which you can't see either... in that shot... Anyway, on something completely different, has anyone seen my black marker pen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neumann Films Posted November 29, 2017 Author Share Posted November 29, 2017 Me thinks you guys are looking for the wrong things here. It's mildly comical ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangenz Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 7 minutes ago, Neumann Films said: Me thinks you guys are looking for the wrong things here. It's mildly comical ? I'm just going with the flow with the hope you find it entertaining. :D It's something with the tripod isn't it? What I can't work out is how you point the camera at the robot, with the sun apparently behind his head, without lighting, and yet his face is lit up like crazy with no noise. Neumann Films 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 5 hours ago, Jonesy Jones said: Then why would he photoshop it out? To fvck with our heads and stir the pot? :-P ha 1 hour ago, Orangenz said: What I can't work out is how you point the camera at the robot, with the sun apparently behind his head, without lighting, and yet his face is lit up like crazy with no noise. it is a new Panasonic Lens Filter that bounces light back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaylee Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 @Neumann Films just tell us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Oh, I get it now, so... there's an XLR hotshoe adapter, without any cables running into it. It is... because the 2nd gen XLR hotshoe adapter... doubles as A RAW RECORDER !1!! It takes the signal from the hotshoe interface! Incl. Dolby Atmos audio from the onboard mic they've added to the XLR unit (Vesku...). Dúh. And RAW has 3 straight elements in the 'R', the 2nd letter 'A' has 3 as well, 3+3=6, more so: the W of course has 3 peaks at the top and 2 at the bottom, 3*2 is 6. And RAW is three letters, so 666. Illuminati* confirmed! *Illuminati is a Panasonic trademark, all rights reserved Liszon, Neumann Films, IronFilm and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liszon Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Yeah, I've been magnifying the crap out of the XLR module too, I think I can see Rick Astley in there.. Orangenz, Cinegain, kaylee and 2 others 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBounce Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Are the bts shots also done with the new camera? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangenz Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 4 minutes ago, DBounce said: Are the bts shots also done with the new camera? GH5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neumann Films Posted December 1, 2017 Author Share Posted December 1, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 Another stunning image Luke. Everything about these images is so creamy. I'm guessing it has something to do with the cheap lens you used. What else is interesting is that the last dimensions were 6656x2496. This one is 3840x1440. An exact proportional decrease by a factor of 1.733333. Any reason for that? That's an odd resolution shift. I dunno. It's late. Maybe I'm missing something simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now