Jump to content
GreekBeast

Sony a7 III discussion

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, anax276 said:

The biggest argument (apart from some specialised video features of the GH5) for me in favour of M4/3 versus FF is the size of the lenses. I don‘t like carrying around heavy stuff und found M4/3 to be a good compromise... But maybe the times have changed?

Are Sony lenses comparable in size and weight with the equivalent m4/3 lenses?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
50 minutes ago, anax276 said:

The biggest argument (apart from some specialised video features of the GH5) for me in favour of M4/3 versus FF is the size of the lenses. I don‘t like carrying around heavy stuff und found M4/3 to be a good compromise... But maybe the times have changed?

Are Sony lenses comparable in size and weight with the equivalent m4/3 lenses?

Well of course the whole equivalence argument tends to mean different things to different people. But I found that I was increasingly looking for bigger and more expensive lenses with M43 than what I considered their equivalent with FF....

http://camerasize.com/compact/#579.639,482.683,ha,t

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Robert Collins said:

I guess that is also debatable with speedboosters etc. But I do think that Sony is making a powerful argument that FF is where we are going to eventually end up....

True, speedboosters get you closer optically, but move you further away in terms of size and weight equivalence. And if we are talking native lenses then AF might be an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Robert Collins said:

...But I found that I was increasingly looking for bigger and more expensive lenses with M43 than what I considered their equivalent with FF....

@metoo  :) , but on the wide side. My only lens now - FF 35mm/1.4 would be 18mm/0.7 on m4/3.. and it was soo cheap..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NOW he should make EV equivalents.   I hate it when the light isn't "weighed" the same.

>>> Max Yuryev has done the first ISO comparison: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rumors before the announcement suggested a price tag of $1899. I wonder if the XH1 price actually persuaded Sony to increase the price of this a little bit :o They've really hit it out of the ballpark with this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Inazuma said:

Rumors before the announcement suggested a price tag of $1899. I wonder if the XH1 price actually persuaded Sony to increase the price of this a little bit :o They've really hit it out of the ballpark with this one.

Well the Sonyalpharumors rumors were pretty wide of the mark

167 autofocus points (actual 693)

No 1080 120 fps

So I am guessing the source really didnt know anything. I would be seriously surprised if those specs were ever planned for US$1899 - they seem incredibly reasonable at the US$1999 price point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Robert Collins said:

Well the Sonyalpharumors rumors were pretty wide of the mark

SonySPAMrumors are often of the mark. Like when a7siii was ranked highest in there stupid ranking system last year. Then we got the riii instead. 

Pretty sure I have enough cookies to open a bakery after I visit that site!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Robert Collins said:

Well the Sonyalpharumors rumors were pretty wide of the mark

167 autofocus points (actual 693)

No 1080 120 fps

So I am guessing the source really didnt know anything. I would be seriously surprised if those specs were ever planned for US$1899 - they seem incredibly reasonable at the US$1999 price point.

It  does have 1080 120 though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no way that is not temporal NR
It looks to be pretty decent at handling noise without color breakdown but it's no longer apples to apples comparison.
Now if it's aimed at the "baseline" it might not be a bad thing since NR is very hard to get right. But what happens if we turn it off(if we can)? Can't really say cleaner 20 times and that makes it so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...