Inazuma

Wow.

I watched a Jared Polin video today and he said there's no 24p in 1080p?

Can you shoot with DR400 mode in 1080p and 4k?

Reason 9: You're paid by Canon /s Nah this camera does look pretty tasty to be honest

But only on a 10mp image

GH line is dead in the water if they don't introduce more marketable features, such as good AF, better low light.

Uses SD cards? HOLY SHIT take my money ? Look, you do you. That's fine For me it's a no

About on par with a 16mp m43 camera https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=canon_eos6dmkii&attr144_1=panasonic_dmcg85&attr144_2=canon_eos80d&attr144_3=nikon_d750&attr146_0=100_4&attr146_1=200_4&attr146_2=100_4&attr146_3=100_4&attr177_1=off&normalization=compare&widget=542&x=-0.34231387549198966&y=0.20912767186597336

The dynamic range on that sensor blows

As good as the image is on the EOS R, I just don't see how it's a practical camera with that big crop and slow readout, unless you're on a planned shoot where you purposely take the required lenses. I won't take this product line seriously until they remove the crop and also improve the battery life.

What did I say huh ? They've announced the lenses now. $2299 for a 50mm f1.4

Ehh well said

One of the reasons I'm still really interested in shooting Nikon asp-c is because of their lens lineup. They have a lot of smallish, F1.8 primes between 16 and 50mm. They also have that 16-80mm f2.8-4 (which at 50mm is f3.5) and unlike Fuji, have the Tolima 11-16mm f2.8 at a very reasonable price. Other than lenses, I loved the ergonomics and image quality of the d5500. If they're going to do a real upgrade this year then I hope they add good phase detect autofocus in live view, a better rear LCD (oled?), Better preamps (d5500 had garbage) and slightly better OVF (without sacrificing body size). I can take or leave 4k personally.

Don't forget high end cameras like the D4 used to cost over £3000. And they barely even had any video features (if at all?)

Can the sharpening in video be turned off or reduced?

hey guys, here is a behind-the-scenes type music video I made earlier last year for my friend's band. I decided to shoot it with a mix of a Hi8 cassette camcorder and the Sony A7III with a mixture of profile settings Lenses Sony 50mm f1.8, Sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4, Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 I hoped to do more with this band but they're quite on-off with different band members coming and going

Can someone give me the short of why they decided to go with 48mp?

I want to see you steal something

Merry Christmas. May you all receive NX1's this year.

Ok

Mostly you'll be wanting to loads of hard drive space so you can make prores/dnxhd proxies of your footage which are much faster to use during the editing process. I have an Intel I7 and Nvidia 1070 8gb and its still a bit choppy with h264 4k footage.

Put the camera on a large gorillapod and use it as a chest/shoulder mount

Why does Canon hate EOSHD??

Seems like a camera for quite a niche market (wildlife?). Hope it works out for them

Your raw processor can make a huge difference to colour though. For example, Panasonic and Sony RAWS look far better in DXO PhotoLab than in Lightroom