newfoundmass Posted Friday at 01:14 AM Author Share Posted Friday at 01:14 AM 6 hours ago, PPNS said: incredible seems a bit overstated. decent maybe I've seen some incredible looking C100 footage, and I think that it still can produce great images today. I bet if you upscaled it and uploaded it to YouTube most people wouldn't notice it wasn't really 4K. FHDcrew 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FHDcrew Posted Friday at 02:12 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:12 AM 7 hours ago, PPNS said: incredible seems a bit overstated. decent maybe It’s not overstated, they can look incredible in the right hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago The C100 would suffer from the same problem that all workhorse cameras suffer from - the best images from them are made by people who are so good at making images they don't post to social media and/or don't list their equipment if they do post. I wonder how many big budget productions have C100 shots mixed in with the C200/C300 main stuff but used the C100 as a higher-risk or mounted cam due to its size and relatively low cost if something happened to it. I've got the occasional beautiful image from my XC10 when the stars aligned and the location and lighting and composition were all working together, and that had a tiny sensor and 10x variable aperture zoom lens. The C100 almost matched it in pixel-peeing terms despite being 1080p and In similar situations the much larger sensor and ability to have nice lenses would be game over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now