Jump to content
BrorSvensson

1dx mark ii, 4k 60fps?

Recommended Posts

The DXmk2 is a dream camera for a breaking news videojournalist like me. Weather sealed and robust as a tank with 4K, 120fps 2K and Dual Pixel AF, it's perfect for shooting riots, sports or any action scenario where a C300mk2 would be too big and obtrusive. With custom picture profiles I don't think CLOG would be missed. But deciding not to include focus peak, when we've been using it in the 5Dmk2/3 for almost three years thanks to the Magic Lantern team, can only be described as one of the biggest GREEDY and I-don't-give-a-f*ck-about-my-customers movements in the history of the camera industry. The could make the best camera in the market for the same money, but they want you to buy 2 cameras or spend more than twice the money in a C300mk2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

Besides not being computer intensive, other than size, an added bonus is it allows for clean 8mb frame grabs every time.

Exactly, shoot the finish of the 100m finals at the Rio Olympics at 60fps for the perfect shot of the winner breaking the tape. Mjpeg makes a lot of sense for the people that will be buying his camera. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The DXmk2 is a dream camera for a breaking news videojournalist like me. Weather sealed and robust as a tank with 4K, 120fps 2K and Dual Pixel AF, it's perfect for shooting riots, sports or any action scenario where a C300mk2 would be too big and obtrusive. With custom picture profiles I don't think CLOG would be missed. But deciding not to include focus peak, when we've been using it in the 5Dmk2/3 for almost three years thanks to the Magic Lantern team, can only be described as one of the biggest GREEDY and I-don't-give-a-f*ck-about-my-customers movements in the history of the camera industry. The could make the best camera in the market for the same money, but they want you to buy 2 cameras or spend more than twice the money in a C300mk2.

I would imagine Canon will have to drop the price on C300II, which currently is more costly than more capable RED Scarlet-W package.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine Canon will have to drop the price on C300II, which currently is more costly than more capable RED Scarlet-W package.

"More capable"? That is very much determined on what you need/don't need.

Even in terms of IQ, each have pros and cons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So just a recap on the crops... The 4K is APS-H crop, no full frame and the 1080p is pixel binned full frame.

I heard some criticism that it shoots 4096 x 2160 instead of the more usual Ultra HD. Can only laugh at that. So trivial to place DCI 4K on a 3840 x 2160 timeline in any NLE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Incredible AF.... I know it is not everyone's thing, but that could be really helpful for gimbal work, interviews etc.

Canon, add C-log then take my money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So just a recap on the crops... The 4K is APS-H crop, no full frame and the 1080p is pixel binned full frame.

I heard some criticism that it shoots 4096 x 2160 instead of the more usual Ultra HD. Can only laugh at that. So trivial to place DCI 4K on a 3840 x 2160 timeline in any NLE.

So, is that mean 120fps full frame 1080p? That would be really great. No crop like a7sII od c300 II in 120fps? I wonder if they improved 1080p codec quality. Something like in 5ds would be nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Focus peaking isn't really needed given touch-screen PDAF. If PDAF-assisted manual focus is provided (as with C300 II), peaking is also not needed.

Full-frame cameras have super shallow depth of field; video shooters really need all the focus aids they can get.

For stills plus occasional movies the 1DC is I'm sure a fine camera.  For folks primarily making movies, there are better and less expensive options out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

- Could have recording times of max. 3 minutes and shoot cropped by 'pulling a Nikon' too of course...

nah don't call it "pulling a Nikon"

They simply were not ready to implement it back when they announced it. But longer length recordings will be coming from Nikon in a future firmware update :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Incredible AF.... I know it is not everyone's thing, but that could be really helpful for gimbal work, interviews etc.

Yup, stuck that thing onto a Ronin-M and you could shoot dancers with the face tracking pretty goddamn well! (I think).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So just a recap on the crops... The 4K is APS-H crop, no full frame and the 1080p is pixel binned full frame.

I heard some criticism that it shoots 4096 x 2160 instead of the more usual Ultra HD. Can only laugh at that. So trivial to place DCI 4K on a 3840 x 2160 timeline in any NLE.

Hmm. I computed 1.42 crop from the diagram, others stated 1.3 and here 1.4 is stated: http://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/19104-canon-1dx-ii-video-camera-perspective-mini-interview-on-the-missing-details/. Also sounds like 1080p will be pristine and alias/moire free- so no pixel binning? This camera is starting to look good as a B-camera for the C300 II.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Focus peaking isn't really needed given touch-screen PDAF. If PDAF-assisted manual focus is provided (as with C300 II), peaking is also not needed.

CFast 2.0, while (currently) expensive, rocks. Copying CFast 2.0 to the computer over USB3 is insanely fast. It's not possible to bend pins on CFast 2.0 as with CF.

If Adobe (or Apple) add GPU accelerated MJPEG support, MJPEG will be less of a bummer (real-time editing will be possible with no transcoding).

Focus peaking is important for controlling your field of focus. Not just for video, but for stills as well.

what do you guys think about this

Screen_Shot_2016-02-02_at_12.12.46_AM.th

I think it is what the D5 was panned for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Focus peaking is important for controlling your field of focus. Not just for video, but for stills as well.

I think it is what the D5 was panned for.

After using the PDAF on the C300 II, peaking and manual focus is way too slow (and clunky) compared to full AF with face tracking (works amazingly well). For manual focus, PDAF assist is superior to manual with focus peaking. For live, unrehearsed shots, PDAF is amazing and peaking isn't useful. A full 1080p display and viewfinder are more helpful for fast, accurate focus vs. peaking in my experience (peaking is based on contrast/edges and is not always accurate or easy to see).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After using the PDAF on the C300 II, peaking and manual focus is way too slow (and clunky) compared to full AF with face tracking (works amazingly well). For manual focus, PDAF assist is superior to manual with focus peaking. For live, unrehearsed shots, PDAF is amazing and peaking isn't useful. A full 1080p display and viewfinder are more helpful for fast, accurate focus vs. peaking in my experience (peaking is based on contrast/edges and is not always accurate or easy to see).

My experience is with the NX1, and my old Canon did not have PDAF, so I can't comment on that. But personally, I have found that when it comes to critical focus with narrow depths of field, peaking is an important tool for ensuring that what you want in your field of focus actually is in focus. Perhaps you might not use it, but others may.

Given the options of having the tool and not having the tool on a 6k camera, it is IMO sort of mind boggling that they would leave it out. There is no good reason for leaving those sorts of tools out. It's applications are not just for video, but stills as well, especially if you are doing macro work. I would rather not guess or rely on what the camera thinks is right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience is with the NX1, and my old Canon did not have PDAF, so I can't comment on that. But personally, I have found that when it comes to critical focus with narrow depths of field, peaking is an important tool for ensuring that what you want in your field of focus actually is in focus. Perhaps you might not use it, but others may.

Given the options of having the tool and not having the tool on a 6k camera, it is IMO sort of mind boggling that they would leave it out. There is no good reason for leaving those sorts of tools out. It's applications are not just for video, but stills as well, especially if you are doing macro work. I would rather not guess or rely on what the camera thinks is right.

If Canon were to render the PDAF pixels showing which pixels were in focus (instead of traditional edge-detector algorithms which mathematically cannot ever always work reliably), that would indeed be very useful and blow away edge-peaking. Perhaps a future feature someday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Below, full picture is 1D X Mark II at 20MP

Largest white box is entire frame of 1D C at 18MP

Smallest white box is DCI 4K.

It's a shame the still can't do a full pixel readout at 5.5K or 6.5K like Samsung have been able to do on the NX1.

I am sure the 1D X Mark II sensor could do 5.5K if they let it!

1d-x-ii-crop-vs-1d-c.thumb.jpg.d3b7440bf

Crazy there is no C-Log.. 2 extra stops of DR and nice highlight rolloff unavailable because of a marketing decision? 

Yeah it's crazy and I really dislike this kind of 'marketing'. They may have lost a few sales here.

Very hard to go back to standard picture profiles after you have spent so much time and effort on your own looks / LUTs.

Canon need to re-consider this...

What exactly would they cannibalise by adding just one Cinema EOS feature to their non Cinema EOS camera!? And it isn't as if the 1D X Mark II is exactly cheap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience is with the NX1, and my old Canon did not have PDAF, so I can't comment on that. But personally, I have found that when it comes to critical focus with narrow depths of field, peaking is an important tool for ensuring that what you want in your field of focus actually is in focus. Perhaps you might not use it, but others may.

Given the options of having the tool and not having the tool on a 6k camera, it is IMO sort of mind boggling that they would leave it out. There is no good reason for leaving those sorts of tools out. It's applications are not just for video, but stills as well, especially if you are doing macro work. I would rather not guess or rely on what the camera thinks is right.

I have used the focus peaking feature on an external monitor. And, to be honest, on a run and gun situation.... I would use it over the old method of magnifying and checking focus, but the new PDAF.... It's just simple... I would definitely use it over peaking any day. If you haven't used it... Trust me... You are missing out. Borrow, Rent a 70D... Also, get yourself a 50/1.2. Play around with the touch screen for day... And it will definitely change your opinion of peaking versus PDAF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...