Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by richg101

  1. If you read my post I said 'I have a feeling'. my feeling was wrong. Fair enough. well there you have it. sony could have made a smaller lens with performance to match the shite canon offering, but instead used that extra space for further elements. the result? a lens that delivers resolution good enough for the 42mpx a7rii.
  2. I have a feeling the reason the sony is so large is that it might be a re-purposed lens. probably originally designed for a-mount, or at the very least designed to be onfigured to be used with a a-mount camera, and then the optical design has been translated into e-mount. the additional 30mm length to make up for the lack of mirror. yep. micro lenses, cover glass etc. all make shorter back focus distances a potential problem. The Loxia lenses take leica style designs and apply correction for micro lenses and cover glass.
  3. a 80mm/2 designed for what looks like the sony 50mp cmos would be small and lightweight - no heavier than a 50mm/1.4 for full frame. The lack of mirror means the system benefits in the same way a leica M system benefits - small lenses due to not needing to be placed 45-75mm from the sensor to clear the mirror. think scaled up Loxia lenses. fast, compact, very high quality.
  4. A MF to FF speed booster is not a viable product because of a few problems:- 1. a good quality optic will be very expensive. the Kipon unit won;t perform as well as the speed booster ultra, and as shown on my tests a few pages up, even the speed booster ultra negatively affects the overall image quality when compared to a straight lens on full frame. add to that the need for electronic contacts to use lenses like the contax645 or rolleiflex hy6 'digital ready' lenses. the cost will mean the customer base will be limited. 2. Most speed booster purchasers do so to get around having
  5. the magic comes from the available optics for a given format. 1. you cannot buy a 60mm/1.4 aps-c lens equivalent to an old leica summicron 90/2 when used on full frame. yes you can stick a 0.7x focal reducer on there, and I have done so (with the sb ultra on a a7rii). the amount of defocus is the same but the rolloff is quicker on the focal reduced lens on aps-c. the in focus areas are also drastically inferior, and there is significant reduction in fov, and added distortion. all of these attributes contribute to the advantage of the larger sensor. 2. you cannot buy a 50mm
  6. I agree with this to a point. my 9year old leaf aptus ii 10 at 80iso (56mpx ccd, 16 bit) destroys my sony a7rii for colour in situations where there is good light. Still I think you are wrong to disregard the effects of a large sensor on dof rolloff. the new Phase 100mpx back is a sony cmos sensor. being 16bit and developed to mimmic the desired look you get from a ccd in its comfort zone has created the best mf sensor ever apparently. in good light I expect my ccd will deliver just as beautiful images, but in bad light the phase 100mpx cmos makes me wanna cry at how good it performs.
  7. you need to burnish the casing back to gloss with a very fine polishing pad. i think a 4000 abralon pad will work well on this. leave the taking lens on for protection of the rear element and to use as a handle to hold onto, then rotate the iscorama in the abralon pad. make the abralon pad moist but ring it out so it's almost totally dry - just damp. a good quality black marker pen like a sharpie will darken the grooves on the grip. I'd avoid wax based products since these are nearly impossible to remove from glass if they end up on the elements. i would however maybe
  8. point of focus is the text on the front of the lens. bokeh bubbles are the same for both shots meaning the ratio between the in focus and fully out of focus areas is the same. HOWEVER, on the aps-c shot the canon text on the camera body, the underside of the tripod head, and the text on the flash are are more blurred than the full frame image. so for a bigger sensor the dof rolloff is slower and therefore more of the camera is in focus. as distance increases and focal length is lengthened this attribute is magnified.
  9. i'm gonna have to start working hard to get some points. anything to make up for my 1.5" fully extended. this opinion is one of the main reasons certain very good photographers miss out on the better work - the disregarding of how important equipment really is from separating two equally good photographers. naturally the one who decides to go that little further - investing in equipment you need to pay a lease to use, rather than saying to themselves they can spend the extra money on a holiday or a new car and carry on using run of the mill canon crap. shooting medium format digital
  10. yes, this is true. but a speed booster is a focal reducer. the ultra is a marvelous piece of glass and as a rule a basic 50mm f2 + speed booster ultra (creating a 35mm/1.4) will vastly outperform most true 35mm/1.4's. Technically a sigma 35/1.4 will meet or exceed, but at the cost of losing all sense of soul and character.
  11. Full frame https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7697/27662722381_982d10fc99_o.jpg APS-C + SB Ultra https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7272/27737331565_423e3503be_o.jpg now I'm gonna say that in order to view the differences you should download the full size files, and bring them into photoshop so you can flip from one layer to another. the differences wont be apparent without. The main thing is overall image quality. shorter focal lengths just don;t deliver the same refined in focus areas - the point of focus on the aps-c shot is drastically harmed by the purple fringing. S
  12. DOF does look odd. As a general rule we're not used to seeing relatively wide shots from a distance that provide such shallow dof, and refined in focus areas. view in full size and you;ll see the point of focus was the text on the boat. makes the front of the boat jump out. I'm happy to send the mos file from the camera if you want proof that no added blur was applied! every person who sees this image asks what lens was used. I always feel bad trying to explain that no matter how much they spend on a lens for a full frame dslr they'll never be able to replicate the dof rolloff and fov.
  13. give me a shout when you find a lens/sensor that will replicate my leaf afi-ii 10 and a 180mm/2.8 https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7506/26997678725_133cd94b63_o.jpg
  14. definitely. On a side note the stacking of two off the shelf 2x units presents quite a few limitations. length of units dictate longer taking lenses or smaller sensors in order to keep field angles small enough to avoid mechanical vignette. both of which have and adverse effect on dof - meaning the effects from the system don;t show up as much. also the longer focal lengths require larger diameter glass to provide adequate transmission of light. I expect a 135mm on full frame, in combination with two 2x anamorphics will result in no faster than f5.6 apertures - even with the ta
  15. richg101

    A7SII Error

    are you using a third party lens/ adaptor? if so, it could be that the contact piuns are being shortcircuited
  16. The fact that you are regularly using the usb port on the camera to charge a battery would imo go some way towards explaining why you;re having issues. basic logic tells me to avoid using a delicate connection like a micro usb port for everything except firmware update. it's NOT a professional port. When using a Sony camera for professional use you have to consider which functions are genuinely right for pro use. canon use common sense and don;t provide in body charging for the exact reason that if they do, people will use it and knacker their usb port. Since the A7Rii sits within the
  17. fantastic idea. though I'd suggest starting with a small high quality 2x, then install a 1.5x iscorama on the front. The problem is that since your taking lens now needs to be longer, the front element is also going to be a lot bigger. a 150mm f2.8 lens for full frame has a front element way larger than a 85mm/2. I expect a rather good combo would be a kowa b+h and a isco54. on full frame you'll need around a 135mm in order to keep field angles low enough on aps-c an 85mm will be a good match. it's funny, I was actually talking to someone a few days ago about using a sensor in por
  18. It appears that it's only the action sports/skater guys who still use canon dslr's for movie making.. they're so busy enjoying their full throttle lives they don;t have the time to sit browsing the web for the latest and greatest gear. The only other camera the action guys seem to know about is gopro and if they're happy with the ghastly image from that, a crippled 5dmk4 will be a dream. If canon didn't reach out to this crowd then they'd not sell any dslr's for video stuff
  19. I don't know.. The image from your f35 will always be special, not to mention the motion. I'd take fullhd upscaled to 4k from an f35 over any camera below an alexa. what lenses are you using predominantly?
  20. That review really shows how the lack of c-log impacts on the 1dxii being usable to produce images good enough for todays demands. that blown window for example, would be blown on a 1dc, but the rolloff would be drastically more filmic. i tell you what.. that tokina 11-16 doesn;t half produce vile images! - i don;t think that helped the piece. You can see he needed a wide, and because the camera doesnt give good results in full frame mode, the stellar wides available in the L series are no longer wides due to needing to go for a sensor crop. for a film about craft, a handycam feel to the
  21. imo the xdcam 35mbs files from the f3 are more 'solid' than the higher mbs xavc-s from the a7s. colour and motion feel right from the f3 too. s-log was perfectly implemented within the pmw f3, f35 and f65. usable dr is more on the f3 from what I've seen too. Love my F3.
  22. Die Hard With a Vengance is probably top for me for overall entertainment. But films like Predator will always stay close to my heart
  23. older summicrons.. 35 (snooted front), 50 (snooted front) and 90. for s35 i don;t think there are a better matched set. serials starting before 28xxxxxxxx tend to have coatings that work well with the single coatings of the isco.
  24. IMO it's dependent on whether you;re willing to invest in a speed booster ultra for the a7rii. if you can handle the extra $500, the a7rii wins for both video and stills unless you;re shooting 6400iso and higher all the time.. 12mpx isn;t quite enough for still photography IMO. it's ok for shallow dof stuff, but when you want a wide shot with everything in focus I find the 42mpx makes for way more pleasing images - particularly landscapes. I had an a7sii temporarily and decided the low light advantage and s-log3 wasn;t worth getting rid of the a7rii. I'm a still photography hobbyist w
  • Create New...