Jump to content

AaronChicago

Members
  • Posts

    2,223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AaronChicago

  1. 19 minutes ago, Damphousse said:

    There are at least two problems with that.  The first is keeping your child off of Youtube and Facebook is going to be a tough struggle and turn them into an outcast.  The second is you will deprive them of the good content on Youtube...  There is no good content on Facebook.

    I didn't mean keep your kids off of YouTube, but just show them the better content and hope it sticks. It's the ole adage "no one knows what they want until you show them."

  2. 49 minutes ago, Sage said:

    Hehe, looks great. Main and Soft are recommended overall as a base, because like Arri's Rec709, they have a special saturation recipe that isn't in LogC natively (its almost 'part' of the color science). The result is a much improved starting point to Arri's 709 look up table, in my estimation.

    I tried Main but when I add a LogC LUT it looked too saturated and contrasty. What do you recommend using after applying MAIN?

    50 minutes ago, austinchimp said:

    Looks nice. I like what it's done to the highlights, and the skin looks great. How does it compare to how you'd graded it before?

    I haven't had a lot of time with it but it's nice. Log C is a nice starting point in my opinion.

  3. I would recommend Aputure as well. The 300d, and 120d/t lights are extremely versatile. They can be transformed from a fresnel, to an area, to a large soft source - thanks to the bowens mount. If you're shooting mostly indoors you could get away with 2 of the 120s. Maybe add a couple of Quasar Science 4' dimmable tubes. You can literally gaff tape those to a ceiling or wall for backlight/fill.

  4. These comparisons always come up and what we end up comparing are static shots with comparable contrast and color. That's awesome for a phone, but the small sensor is still evident when EVERYTHING is in focus on the iPhone. f22 or bust.

×
×
  • Create New...