JaeM Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Hi there - here's a link to download this test: http://vimeo.com/jaemorrison/iscorama54test01 I was interested in seeing what Apertures were sharp with different Achromats & Diopters. Rather than waste even more time cutting a boring video, I've just uploaded a boring image sequence for you to download and step through frame-by-frame. The Achromats and Diopters tested were: Redstan +.25 Achromat Tokina +.4 Achromat Voightlander Focar A Voightlander Focar B And some stacked combinations of the above. Apologies if the test isn't ideal (h264 certainly isn't) - thought it was worth sharing as I've learnt a lot from people posting stuff here. Cheers, Jae. Rudolf, Tito Ferradans and ch_d 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bioskop.Inc Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Hi there - here's a link to download this test: http://vimeo.com/jaemorrison/iscorama54test01 I was interested in seeing what Apertures were sharp with different Achromats & Diopters. Rather than waste even more time cutting a boring video, I've just uploaded a boring image sequence for you to download and step through frame-by-frame. The Achromats and Diopters tested were: Redstan +.25 Achromat Tokina +.4 Achromat Voightlander Focar A Voightlander Focar B And some stacked combinations of the above. Apologies if the test isn't ideal (h264 certainly isn't) - thought it was worth sharing as I've learnt a lot from people posting stuff here. Cheers, Jae. Nice one Jae, that will make a good reference guide - since i have the same set up. Nice to see that the Focars hold up quite well in comparison to the Tokina. Which Redstan +0.25 do you have - is it a doublet? The only problem is that the Helios 40-2 is v.soft wide open (I love it, but for a test...), have you tried it with something like a Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 - so far that seems to be my sharpest combo with the 54. Thanks again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaeM Posted March 12, 2014 Author Share Posted March 12, 2014 Yeah, it does go a bit crap wide open, you're right. I've got some other Helios 58s / Super Taks 50s that I'll do it again on too - just ran out of energy after that one. Will link a Prores4444 version to this too on a dropbox link. Yes, it's the doublet from Redstan. I'd be interested to hear what lenses you've found the sharpest combos - had a Mir-1b on a scarlet with this adapter at 4K, was soft round the edges, but in a good way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaeM Posted March 12, 2014 Author Share Posted March 12, 2014 Here's a prores4444 version: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5e0e6o8q1668wnu/Iscorama54_Diopter_Aperture_Test_prores4444.mov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bioskop.Inc Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 I'd be interested to hear what lenses you've found the sharpest combos - had a Mir-1b on a scarlet with this adapter at 4K, was soft round the edges, but in a good way. As I said the Super-Tak 55mm f1.8 & 35mm f3.5 are v.good for sharpness. The Russain lenses can be a bit of a crap shoot quality-wise & the Mir 1b does seem to be the weakest link (still nice though), but have you tried the Mir 24 35mm f2 (it comes in Nikon or M42 & is MC) its much better. The other Russains that i like are the Tair 11a, Jupiter 9 ( a 85mm f2 - dreamy wide open like the Helios 40-2) & the classic Helios 44-2. The Yashica ML lenses are good on a budget or if you've got the money Zeiss Contax (obviously). I've recently switched cameras to the BM Pocket & have been using a Nikon 24mm f2.8 ai-s which is proving to be excellent (will post a grading test soon), so am really tempted to go the whole hog & get a set. However, I love my Russain lenses & would rather wait a little to see if the Canon EF Speedbooster gets released. On a slightly different note, I got the chance to see the original box for the 54 & it did state that it was optimised to be used with Zoom lenses as well as Primes. So I've been really tempted to try this out with either the Angenieux 35-70mm + speedbooster or the Meteor 5-1 16-69mm f1.9 (a 16mm film lens) - probably the later as its way cheaper & Russain. The Helios 40-2 is a lovely lens & the swirly bokeh wide-open is to die for & a test chart isn't the same as actually filming with it - love it, just can't use it with the Pocket cam. I've got one of his Angenieux single +0.25, but your doublet really sharpens things up nicely - i was really tempted to get one. Anyways, nice test & thanks for the ProRes version! Lucian 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaeM Posted March 14, 2014 Author Share Posted March 14, 2014 Thanks for your info, keen to try a set of Nikkors Ai-s on them too, and that's really interesting that the box said they're designed for zooms. I've updated the vimeo video and dropbox link (probably still uploading) with the following lenses: Asahi Pentax Super Takumar f/1.4, 50mmHelios 77M-4 f/1.8, 50mmHelios 44 f/2, 58mmHelios 44M-4 f/2, 58mmHelios 40-2 f/1.5, 85mm Will keep adding to it as I get through my other lenses - I have the Tair & Jupiter too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bioskop.Inc Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Thanks for your info, keen to try a set of Nikkors Ai-s on them too, and that's really interesting that the box said they're designed for zooms. I've updated the vimeo video and dropbox link (probably still uploading) with the following lenses: Asahi Pentax Super Takumar f/1.4, 50mmHelios 77M-4 f/1.8, 50mmHelios 44 f/2, 58mmHelios 44M-4 f/2, 58mmHelios 40-2 f/1.5, 85mm Will keep adding to it as I get through my other lenses - I have the Tair & Jupiter too. Thanks for doing this & the time/effort it takes to do it. Just out of interest, which camera are you using - scarlet or...? The Zoom thing freaked me out & i've seen a couple of posts where people have talked about using Zooms with the 54, but to get it from the horses mouth was reassuring. However, I wouldn't have thought it was that practical, since the 54 isn't the smallest lens & lens support is essential, especially with the tiny Super-Taks. So really need an internal zoom. > Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Hi Jae! Thank you very much for your work! Very informative and good to know especially if you are on film and doing tests like these cost you a lot of money :) On a slightly different note, I got the chance to see the original box for the 54 & it did state that it was optimised to be used with Zoom lenses as well as Primes. The 54 was (and still is) often used on Super-8 cameras. Most of these cameras have zooms. Mostly from Schneider, some Angenieux. The Schneider Optivaron for example is a very sharp lens. 6-66mm F 1.8 and has 62mm thread. The 54 had a step-ring for that size. Maybe I shoulde try my Optivaron for Leitz with an adapter on the GH3... The Angenieux lenses tend to be softer and have less contrast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaeM Posted March 15, 2014 Author Share Posted March 15, 2014 Here's a new link to an updated prores4444 version: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ef7ov6o5x52i14y/R6cSuFmo-c and Vimeo link: https://vimeo.com/88869240 ANAMORPHIC ADAPTER: Iscorama 54 ACROMATIC DOUBLETS / DIOPTERS: Redstan +.25 Achromat Tokina +.4 Achromat Voightlander Focar A Diopter Voightlander Focar B Diopter LENSES Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Flektogon f/2.4, 35mm Mir-1B f/2.8, 37mm Asahi Pentax Super Takumar f/1.4, 50mm Helios 77M-4 f/1.8, 50mm Helios 44 f/2, 58mm Helios 44M-4 f/2, 58mm Helios 40-2 f/1.5, 85mm Helios f/2.8, 135mm Tair 11a f/2.8, 135mm Jupiter 6-2 f/2.8, 180mm Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Flektogon f/2.8, 20mm (Paired with 1.33x Panasonic Ag-La7200) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Reeve Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Wow great resource! Will check it in detail soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shredflakes Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 hey there! how does the reds tan .25 compare to the tokina .4, both in terms of added sharpness and CA reduction; and focus range? I have the Tokina and it's great, but would love some more control of focus range. Thanks! Lucian 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucian Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 Interesting, I didn't know redstan's doublet had arrived! I think I may have to sell a tokina and buy one. Who's tried one? at .25 you could almost put one on and rarely take it off your anamorphic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kado Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 Interesting, I didn't know redstan's doublet had arrived! I think I may have to sell a tokina and buy one. Who's tried one? at .25 you could almost put one on and rarely take it off your anamorphic. whats the focal range (min to max) of a .25 diopter on an isco 54? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucian Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 on further inspection 82mm i'm not sure ithe 0.25 would be a good match for the iscroama 36, you'd need to add step rings which would increase vignette even further (doublets are quite chunky and increase vignette threshold quite a bit already) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now