Jump to content

New Nikon D5300 with Expeed 4


Aussie Ash
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest 89e2bdf5797fbbdc17c2cc6da1413fa0

Bucketload of D5300 + Atamos Ninja videos. Shame they're on MushTube and compressed to within an inch of their life. My best guess is that the footage is indeed sharper (no surprise), but still not really sharp.

 

I don't know how the Ninja works, but I think I'm seeing interlacing during pans + tilts, which I don't like at all. Perhaps the shooter had the Ninja set up wrong?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. We are very new to a filming world, but trying to progress and improve. At the time we shot this music video, we were not familiar with Flaat and other picture controls, which can give more dynamics and a more suitable image for later colour corrections. Now we have started to use it. Before we bought the D5200, we had done an extensive analysis and we are happy with both decisions now. So it was easier to decide on the D5300, which could be worth a deeper review by Andrew Reid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DSLR video camera that I've been wanting for years still does not exist -- especially from Nikon. But I think the 5300 is really close.

 

Is it my imagination, or does 720p @ 60fps almost jello-free? (Such minimal rolling shutter that it's not even noticed?)

 

I need to read the specs agaon for storage, burst shooting, etc. Very tempted!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Great stills, indeed. It has a superb sensor for that.

 

But taken purely from the perspective of video, it's all very 2010.

 

The $799 doesn't really excuse it from being so low on innovation either. For this you can almost get a Pocket Cinema Camera and a much more cinematic image. Or you can get a more video optimised mirrorless camera with more features.

 

The D5300 does not even enable me to properly mask off the LCD to 16:9, that's how little thought Nikon have put into it for video.

 

OK say you have $1999 to spend in total. If you're not too serious about video you might be happy enough spending $799 on the Nikon and spend the rest on lenses. But in light of the upcoming GH4 it makes no sense to invest in the D5300. I understand well that $799 might be the budget and nothing more. In that case, get the older D5200 for $400 and spend the rest on a lens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got at least a dozen quality lenses for the Nikons. And I want the 35mm look for what's shot, not the camcorder look. What I want doesn't yet exist, but it gets closer to every generation.

 

Yeah, the 5300 is a cheap camera (my main body is a Nikon D3s), and DSLR makers are rather slow to compared to other video camera tech. But there's some appealing things to the 5300 -- (1) the video shooting and (2) the lack of low-pass filter for shooting.

 

If I wanted a truly better camera, I'd grab a Canon or Sony in the $5k to $15k range. But I want to cut some costs corners. Shooting video is mostly hobby. (Just the shooting part,)

 

I need to look at the Blackmagic cams more -- lens option especially. So-so lens would be a killer for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

I felt the same way you do about the D5300, when the GH2 came out, so I understand where you're coming from. The D5300 does have an attractive price and it gets the job done. But seriously, think about the future and where things are heading. Wouldn't it be far better to wait until after NAB and to see what else is on offer? Even if you end up having to push towards the $1999 range or get the GH4, it would be money well spent in my book.

 

Want Super 35mm, 1080/60p, good low light? Consider GX7 with Nikon Speed Booster or a used Sony FS100.

 

Also I'd question why so much importance is placed on Super 35mm sized sensors, 1080/60p. Good low light I can appreciate more and the D5300 certainly has that.

 

I think when people see the review, it might be divisive and start a few arguments... Remember it is just my opinion and what works best for me might not necessarily be right for you, so consider your own views ahead of mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew - I purchased a D5300 after taking a careful look at the BMPCC.  It came down to the kind of work I am doing, and the kind of look and feel I want from the resulting footage.  I do not want a "cinema" look - I shoot documentary, and the D5300 is delivering that for me very effectively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's really a shame they didn't at least put a headphone jack on the D5300. 

 

When I use my Ninja II for an external recorder, it has a headset jack that you can hear either the incamera mic or the external one thru the HDMI port.

It can also hear recorded sound from an ampified mic or other sound system plugged into the Ninja mic port

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://***URL not allowed***/?p=23465

 

Cinema 5d has done a little review and states that it is the best image out of an Apsc dslr and very frustrating to use. Unfortunately for me as always we read more than we see. It seems that putting this camera side by side of another camera to show how it behaves in terms of DR, resolution, low light etc is too much. I hope someone does a good thorough test of this camera, looking at the response I guess the Nikon is starting to get some momentum in the video dslr users even if it is not fancy enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to laugh at the Cinema 5d review Danyyyel.A guy like Brandon Li accepts the quirks of using a 5200/5300

and is happy to  shoot interviews with it.!!

Brandon Li used it for the last several months to shoot interviews for the Yahoo! original web series â€œThe Girl’s Gameâ€. He has also been testing it a bit for run-and-gun documentary-style shooting. Audio is Sony ICD-SX712u portable recorders and Azden lavalier mics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Review now published - '?do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>>

 

Please post further discussion on that thread.

 

Cheers

Not sure why you butchered this video by downgrading it and reducing it to 24P unless you hate Nikon.

I am not a film maker but am getting better results than this with my D5300 at 1080P 60

even at 6400 and 12800 ISO.

What lens was used and at what f stop?

Was the glass even clean?

 

I agree that the GH4 should be much better, at twice the price.

Even so, I have ordered one to get better ISO, AF, Monitors, Processor, etc. than my GH3.

However, if Nikon could just activate continuous shooting in their firmware I would be back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By BruyereHansen
      So I am about to purchase Canon's C100 Mark II.  just a question about the slow motion options on the camera.
      I want to make a clip that shoots in slow motion but while recording at 60 Fps i want to transition back to normal velocity while recording is it possible to do this? without any type of Atomos Ninja device? I don't want to have to go into video editing either to do it because it can diminish the quality of the slow motion and the transitioning. 
    • Guest
      By Guest
      I'm selling my D5300 as I've just bought a GH4 and can't justify 3 cameras. I love the D5300 but the GH4 image, especially with a speed booster, is capable of being very similar in colour and low light terms (and of course superior in many ways). I do in a lot of ways prefer the D5300 image - particularly the colour science - but I know that in reality, next to my GH4 and BMPCC, it won't get much use.
       
      Anyway, if anyone is interested it's on ebay starting at £299, auction closing this evening. There are no bids at the moment so if anyone here is sure they want it, message me and you can have it for £270 not incl. P&P (£11 to UK for next day delivery, I'll calculate worldwide costs if needed). Ebay listing:
       
      http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/161521116555?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
       
      It's in excellent condition - mechanically perfect and cosmetically I can't see anything to complain about at all. Shutter count is 2499. 1 year old. Still under guarantee for another year. 3 batteries.
       
      I shot these on it soon after I first got it. It's a great video camera. I'm going to miss it. *sniff*
       

       

       

       

    • Guest
      By Guest
      This is a promotional reel I've just made for the small videography business I'm currently setting up (one-man-band doing local community organisations, weddings etc). Everything in it was shot on low-end/cheap cameras, several of which have been discussed and compared extensively on this forum over the last year or two. To boot, other than the Tokina 11-16mm all of the lenses were each bought for under $300.
       
      After a couple of enquiries about the gear I used for this reel, I've decided to add subtitles to show each camera (and lens) each shot was taken with. Just click the 'CC' button in the Vimeo play bar to turn the subtitles on.
       
      I'd welcome feedback on my reel, but this is mainly posted here in the hope it might be of use to others:
       

       
      Sorry the subtitles aren't synched perfectly to each edit (it's not easy with Amara). You'll work it out though I hope ...
    • Guest
      By Guest
      I'm starting to set myself up a small videography business: just a one-man-band doing local stuff - community group promos, weddings, etc. I'm still working on the website (www.lintelfilms.co.uk) and have just finished the 2nd draft of my promotional film. I'd really appreciate your feedback on the film. I don't mind at all if you are brutal!
       

    • By EvanPerkins
      Hey guys!
       
      I'm looking to get into video work, and I'm trying to figure out which camera would best suit my needs. I'm looking for a camera with great stills as well as video. The 3 main contenders for me are panasonic's gh3 and g6 and Nikon's d5300. All of them offer full HD at 24 at 60fps, which is crucial for me. They also all have a 3.5mm jack for external microphone. These specs are similar, but Panasonic's seem to be better for video. If it was video alone, I would choose the Panasonic cameras. But, I'm also looking for great stills. Right now I have the sony a58, and I don't want anything under the quality of its stills. The d5300 has better dynamic range, AF, sensor size, and low light performance. I've heard that the d5300 is one of the best APS-C sensor cameras for video, but it's also one of the most annoying to use. I don't want to sacrifice any stills/video quality. Which would you guys suggest? 
       
      Here's a post by eoshd themselves against the d5300. 
      http://www.eoshd.com/2014/02/nikon-d5300-review/
       
      I would really appreciate the help!
×
×
  • Create New...