Emanuel

There is some silly people on here!

Nice.
now we must have two cameras:
one for daylight, and anouther for low-light.
what next?  gh5se with 16 stops of dr, but with only fullhd and no slow-motion
gh6- same as gh5s, but with IBIS and with 6k, omg

Reliability is paramount. Nothing a bunch of batteries can't overcome. When any add-on of gear or even by software is truly PITA. Not feasible for hundreds of shooting scenarios. Mark my words, they would beg for a dozen of batteries if necessary. To be honest, I find barely unacceptable when professionals complain about handling several battery units.
Stabilization in-camera, well, is simply a game changer. They're going backwards on that one. Power supply is a weak excuse to my view.
GH5S is both a brilliant cinema camera and the best accessory to couple with GH5. Only an outdated hybrid though. Strictly because of a business decision under my perspective.

Learn to do your home lesson instead, dude... : ) Here are more LEGIT tests. FUD is over, for once, I hope.
 
(vimeo embedding is not available there:)
https://vimeo.com/227812784
 
 
What about to research a little bit before to take assumptions based on what pops up written on internet? ;-)
Let's take a look on those vimeo users:
https://vimeo.com/perfectloveweddings
https://vimeo.com/littlepotatofilms
Do they look like suspicious??! LOL :-)
Right. FUD is a bitch and never welcome. Sorry to feel the need to write it.

The most ingenious here is the fact practice redefines theory... ; ) I've learned with what I've seen :-)

Gotcha! My turn instead LOL : ) Shame my posts failed to convince him to go on my and in his own behalf ;-)

For some reason you are suppose to use a fairly wide angle lens when using it. It does look interesting. And price is certainly cheaper than a normal Gimbal, and looks less Dorky using it LoL.
Come on Panny We were hoping you would be the Ginnie Pig to buy it first and tell us about the results.

[PS]
Without mention ISO2500 (my fav top end and one of mine too) is one of their natives; BTW this dual ISO stuff is not proper of a consumer device (our old chap Don @webrunner5 is pretty accurate on the spot when properly calls it a game changer) as much as their 10-bit high bitrate codec bonus but now by default with the whole dynamic range at disposal on their high end too, well well... Well tempting.

You mean, like...
I'll be informing the authorities about this!

I don't think there's anything strange on videos like this one here:
https://vimeo.com/244689449
Besides the fact the owner seems pretty legit:
https://vimeo.com/worksmanuelpalma/videos
As much as the previous one BTW...
They've just added their shaky side-by-side sample only not sync with. That's it. Hence to look like wider. Yes, it is. Not TC sync there.
The first user also had some parts to really scream for a stab hand so...
Everything seems fine to my eyes so far. Even though I had seen only those.

Would love for that to be the case...especially given higher sensitivity..there will likely be something in the frame that's "hot". If so..that, along with timecode i/o would help in more pro setups.
Timecode is a game-changer in this camera class. Even c200 lacks it. Not just a multicam feature..more often it's for dual system audio crews.
Regarding Panny rep's comment on audio, hard to say whether there is improvement beyond the onboard mic. They need to put the monitoring latency bypass feature back in.
 

Zak, my bet is that overprocessed sharpness on GH5 also comes from its 20MP high rezzed sensor as even anamorphic samples from there show it. So the stuff must be calmer down this time, my guess. Hope not to be too naive here. I've found blur as a good workaround though. Odd to admit it.
E :-)

Just to confirm and recommend also. Temporal noise reduction segment is, in fact, pretty fast and accurate - in many case even totally adequate and sufficiеnt. With newer Resolve incarnation noise reduction is not longer so to say "pain in the ass".

+1
Cinema is inaccurate coloring the world... ;-)

You understand me, Emanuel. Thank you:)

Well, the shot looks like she was a scream queen from a Dario Argento color fest, doesn´t she? I just didn´t worry about logical color nor about polluted highlights. It still looks creamy and luscious, just not accurate but giving the estimation of a cinematic image, still miles ahead of DSLM color, being rich and luxurious.:)

oh yeah, the GH series is definitely well-suited to your needs. but the notion that one camera "beats" another is pretty dumb. we all know you choose the tool that suits your needs, and yet, we see comments like: the GH5S's low light ability "redeems" panasonic for the EVA1. it doesn't do that any more than a new coffee maker from Panasonic redeems their latest espresso machine for being too complicated -- some people need the flexibility to pull the perfect espresso shot, others want to hit one button to make coffee. it's not a competition.
FYI -- Jon, i don't know if you use Resolve but the NR they implemented in v12.5 is inches away from what Neat Video can do, but a lot easier to work with. It's pretty darn good.
hopefully youtube isn't hiding the same issue and this Venus Engine's NR is an improvement over the GH5. fingers firmly crossed.

No idea if I should be happy or sad...
 

It's a steal as matter of fact. Just wondering where and why they charge a premium (5x VLog add-on) for a bit less when they've subtracted IBIS from their original GH5 package. When we'll probably see it in a couple of years with the upcoming GH6s.  

haha well put, pal, I told you, your hilarious entries have gotten me! :-)
Done with my quota of likes for today, here's my public/personal thanks for so interesting info added here, Jon :-) 
That's quite of a camera this beast Panasonic has invented for more than half a grand they should charge for, I say.
Tell me about another manufacturer offering Dual Native ISO under 5 digits and a 2nd camera model for a fraction (a quarter BTW) of it, Glenn! @mercer  
That NY noiseless footage has sold me enough for my pre-order or whatever they call it.
So long 500 bucks! :-D

hehe you and your Canons... :D I agree with your 1st paragraph ; ) be careful with copyrights but once it is also your opinion you should be fine :-)
oh God, each post from yours, a pearl by its own... : ) I rest my case! :-) Save your energy to handhold your 8-year used RED ONE MX instead :-D
- RED ONEs #111 & #647   

Something to chew on.

Sir Adam Wilt, so to speak ;-)

Adam Wilt provides what I'd say is probably the best review of the camera. Not "best" as in positive. I mean "best" as in the most comprehensive without exaggerating the impact of its highlights or shortcomings. Just straightforward reporting of his findings. Definitely a worthy read for any owners or potential buyers.   
https://www.provideocoalition.com/review-panasonic-au-eva1-4k-cine-camera/
 

Don't sweat it! There will always be naysayers... ; ) Finding anything to try proving your grass is less greener.
@mercer Glenn, time to book your GH5 series driving test! Lucky boy, they only released two versions! ;-)