ntblowz

A7RII have PDAF and A7SII doesn't have it, A6500 have but not RX100 V, so yeah i doubt it, Sony have their own way of differentiate product line My A5100 have touch screen phase detection af and it has been out for how long now?

dont think so, even FS7II doesn't have hybrid AF and that thing cost a lot more Maybe the A9 will have it all!

I think u mean A7RIII lol A7S is CDAF only

Lowlight is not much better on A6500, I got both G7 and A6300 and their lowlight is not bad but cant hold candle to A7RII or A7S/A7SII, FHD on A6300 is soft which is a problem when I paired with camera which are sharp (ie fs5/a7sii/c100 mkii etc) over the past years I got 2~3 cards fail (all using sandisk extreme card btw) so I definitely prefer dual cards for safety,

True, but then again IS on the A7 seems weak to me, not sure about A6500 Olympus is definitely the most stable now that I got e-m5 ii to play with.

It should be the same regardless, only 5 Axis with Sony lens, well that my experience with A7SII A7RII, less stable using adapted Canon lens than Sony native

A7II is 5 Axis IBIS

http://briansmith.com/sony-a7ii-hands-on-review/ No X/Y Compensation with 3rd party and selective A mount lens, leaving only 3 axis

Sony only uses 3 Axis IS when using non natives, vs full 5 axis when using non native on M43 body. You can do walks with just handheld, ninja walk, trained arm and warp stabilizer works wonders, not as good as gimbal (especially for long distance) but close enough

Pretty sure it will be called FS5 II and cost $5000+

My friend is selling his XC10 right now and try to get A7SII instead, he used to have A7S but sold that to get XC10 because of the "image quality" touted by online forum and easier match to his C100, turns out quality is crap to his C100, he really dont want to deal with Sony colour I guess he have no choice lol

Since they use same sensor tech, we can expect GH5 to be similar score, like GX8 got 75 and Pen-F got 74, they both use same sensor, I guess this 20MP is indeed different than the previous one

Horses for courses For the stuff I do gh5 is more suited, live events (like conference) that goes for hours, music video with proper lighting (use 3x arri 650 usually), I don't really need low light much except for occasional astro photography My FS5's lowlight is not as good as my A7S/A7RII but it is my mostly used camera, ergonomic on that is much nicer. I will get 2x anamorphic adapter when I got my gh5, should be interesting to play with.

is 180fps unlimited time like gh4?

Whats wrong with A6500 for stills if you considering D5500, pretty sure their DR is similar?

Yes it will have 5 axis even with old glass (unlike Sony u only get 3 axis with manual lens), just if u use compatible Panasonic lens it will get Dual IS 2 which is even more stable

Still find hard to belive ISO12800 is usable on GH5

Panasonic haven't use MPJEG since GH3, I think they probably use AVC-Ultra for high bit rate? From Varicam :: AVC Intra 4K 422 25p 388 mbps

Well I still like Oly color more even with EOSHD Pro Color on my A6300, and pro color only works on video but not still.

Yeah as stated on their spec sheet C-DNG RAW 5.2K: 5280×2972 23.976/24/25/29.97p, up to 4.2Gbps 4K: 4096×2160, 3840×2160 23.976/24/25/29.97p, up to 2.4Gbps 4K: 4096×2160, 3840×2160 50/59.94p, up to 4.0Gbps

Yes you are right, I can set it but doesnt change anything, must be a bug for Sony's part or they purposely cripple it

Just purchased EOSHD Sony color, I can set Color Depth when selecting S.Gamute3.cine on my A6300 Here is the compare Pro color is a bit too red for me, while S.Gamute3.cine is about right

E-m10 have rolling of 10ms, beating even the FS7

Hmm didn't have plug for Sony mirrorless cameras, that one big fail

Only 20m with wifi is really short distance, interesting though it uses 28mm f2 same as on mavic