New L-Mount Lumix (cinema?) Camera

[ita149]

6 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

Who needs an S1H II when you have an S1 Mark ?E?E?E?E?E

E for electronic shutter, to save costs.

E for Exactly the same body as the cheapo camera from 2022 to save costs.

E for enamoured with accountancy.

E for enormous lack of creativity.

E for eeee dear.

E for End, as in the brand, and soon the entire system as well.

E for E-mount which has a 3 year old model that's twice as good.

E for erm, do I want to sign an NDA and go to some fancy Knightsbridge business lunch to see it.

N for no fucking thanks!

I was a long time Panasonic user who have bought most of their high end cameras and lenses, but not anymore.
I had some issues with their full frame lenses developing white dots inside the internal elements, including a 2500$ 50mm S Pro lens. This is something well documented everywhere from Facebook groups to Dpreview forums with many users having the same issue on the same lenses.

All what they was able to tell me is it was probably mold, implicitly saying it was caused by my fault because of bad storage or use.
Of course this is my fault, I have used a lot (really a lot) of lenses from Canon, Sony, Sigma, Tamron, Samsung, Olympus etc, I always stocked them in dry place and never used them in the rain. I just never seen anything like this.
I have even seen this issue out of the box on a new Lumix S 35mm f1.8 lens, someone on Dpreview also had its Lumix S 35mm lens exchanged because of the same issue, he should have returned the lens immediatly for a refund like I did. But yes it's probably my fault to have bought too much of their craps. 
It's also probably a coincidence if only their Lumix S lenses are affected ...

The only similar case I've seen was from a 50mm Sony FE Zeiss Planar which had a recall by Sony. And like on the Panasonic S lenses, it didn't looked like mold or fungus at all, just bad internal elements degrading over time and affecting contrast. I don't particularly like Sony either but at least they were more honest.

I have zero confidence in buying their products again.

[BTM_Pix]

8 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

E for erm, do I want to sign an NDA and go to some fancy Knightsbridge business lunch to see it.

N for no fucking thanks!

One of the key parts of what makes an NDA enforceable in the UK is the consideration of a power imbalance between the parties.

”Parties should not attempt to take unfair advantage of any imbalance in power during the negotiation of an NDA”

I’d like to see the outcome of “$58Billion Revenue/230K Employees company Vs Blogger” in respect of trying to make that fine stick.

There is also a part in excluding its enforcement if you divulge the contents to law enforcement.

So if it was re-using the same S5ii body shell then you could legally have walked out of the restaurant and into the nearest police station and announcing to the duty officer “I would like to report a crime”.

[Simon Young]

Specifications on the S1iiE leaked:

https://latam.connect.panasonic.com/mx/es/productos/lumix/lumix-s1iie

Not very exciting apart from the Arri logC information. Between the lines this seems to carry a tweaked IMX410 once again. 

[zerocool22]

11 minutes ago, Simon Young said:

Specifications on the S1iiE leaked:

https://latam.connect.panasonic.com/mx/es/productos/lumix/lumix-s1iie

Not very exciting apart from the Arri logC information. Between the lines this seems to carry a tweaked IMX410 once again. 

Well most of us were just waiting on 50fps 4k full frame. I hope everything else improved as well. 

Like a better monitor, better colors etc. Prores raw internal is a bummer as resolve does not support it natively. 

[Simon Young]

5 minutes ago, zerocool22 said:

Well most of us were just waiting on 50fps 4k full frame. I hope everything else improved as well. 

Like a better monitor, better colors etc. Prores raw internal is a bummer as resolve does not support it natively. 

Yes but that's is what the S1ii is supposed to deliver, the 50fps 4k. But it's a piece if shit if it suffers from the same moiré that plagues the Z6iii and the s5ii anyway. And supposedly for 3500 euros 🤣

[MrSMW]

1 hour ago, Davide DB said:

What we all loved about Panasonic was its ability to stand out from the rest. In a market completely dominated by the usual players, it was able to innovate. Now that drive has been completely lost.

That is where I am at with old Pannyboy.

Moved over to them from Fuji as I felt I wanted to be in full frame rather than APSC for both stills and video.

Initially continued with APSC video, albeit in L Mount flavour and in non-log before upping my game in that regard also.

I feel I have now reached 'peak set up' for my video needs with L Mount and just about there on my stills needs with a combo of Sony & Nikon.

I don't need Lumix/L Mount to develop any further.

I would have liked to have seen them do so, but the signs are now that they have stagnated. Big time.

The S9 was and is OK and works for my needs.

I could make a case for the S1Rii, but it would be a sideways move.

For video, lens-wise, I'm covered.

For stills though, I have one last fairly big decision to make. Well not so much make as I have already made it and that is re. a specific lens and when that happens, it also makes sense to go over whole hog, to Sony/e-Mount for both stills and video.

It could not work for me in the other direction ie, there are still big holes for me in the stills department with L Mount.

So sorry Lumix, the writing is on the wall. My wall at least. Nothing wrong with what you are currently providing for me, but I doubt very much whether I will be with you beyond October of this year. And that is on you.

[John Matthews]

27 minutes ago, Simon Young said:

Yes but that's is what the S1ii is supposed to deliver, the 50fps 4k. But it's a piece if shit if it suffers from the same moiré that plagues the Z6iii and the s5ii anyway. And supposedly for 3500 euros 🤣

All cameras will suffer from moiré in some contexts even with an OLPF. There are numerous examples of this. Also, the Z6iii had way bigger problems at launch (shadow-flicker gate). Higher megapixel cameras, in general, will have fewer problems with moiré in my opinion.

[eatstoomuchjam]

5 hours ago, ND64 said:

Why this €25k fine doesn't work in mainland China? 99% of all the leaks are from China, and mostly by distributors, not by an independent journalist or a reviewer who wants to find the bugs and send feedback to the engineering team before the release. Can't they distinguish between friend and foe? 

In many cases, I'm pretty sure that the leaks are actually part of the marketing strategy for the manufacturers.  They just want to be able to control how and when the leaks come out.  Look how the trickle of leaks has inspired discussion on this forum.

If Panasonic simply said they were releasing a camera on May 14 and then released it on that day with no leaks, it would be discussed here for maybe a week after (maybe less judging by the reactions above) and then a bit more when real people start receiving them.  Instead, it's discussed for more than 2 weeks.

The latam leak seems legit accidental, though - and I can't see it now.  Judging by the discussion around it, I don't think I care much about that.  Guessing it'll be a 6K camera that looks a lot like a camera (to judge by the leaked photos) and will have some fans and some detractors.  

[mtol]

I would tend to disagree with a lot of users here. The price seems outrageous for what you get, but I do think a more compact S1 style image with lower rolling shutter and a body recording 32bit audio would basically check all the boxes I could think of needing. I don't need to chase other features.

I do worry about over-sharpening though, as was the case with the s5II.