Danyyyel Posted Sunday at 11:02 AM Share Posted Sunday at 11:02 AM 3 hours ago, ND64 said: NR is stronger on ZR, but its not just NR. There should be something else. I think they have been tweaking the Sensor since they launched the Z6iii. The S1ii showed them that this sensor was better than what the Z6iii was capable of, even without the DR boost mode. Perhaps the sensor was a bit rushed for the launched of the Z6iii and since then, with Sony, they have been able to refine the settings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ND64 Posted Sunday at 04:39 PM Author Share Posted Sunday at 04:39 PM 5 hours ago, Danyyyel said: Perhaps the sensor was a bit rushed for the launched of the Z6iii That doesn't make sense. Tweaking sensor can't happen in few months, and it will be so expensive that it would be more feasible to make a new sensor from scratch. I don't believe they're different sensors. But the pipeline has been changed for sure. Maybe a new debayer algorithm and chroma noise reduction provided by RED is implemented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted Monday at 05:32 PM Share Posted Monday at 05:32 PM It is the pipeline, of course... :- ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ND64 Posted Tuesday at 09:05 AM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 09:05 AM Everything attached to this camera eclipses the body 😄 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video Hummus Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago On one hand, we have a video company (Panasonic) with a very robust video imaging pipeline, managing to squeeze an amazing amount of DR and latitude performance out of sensor that first appeared (lackluster; performance wise) in the Z6III. However, the camera was still heavily criticized for "terrible" rolling shutter performance and seemingly NOT being a SONY camera. Never-mind sony has released several cameras with terrible rolling shutter but people still shat their pants for them. The curse of being Panasonic LUMIX and not Sony Alpha. Nikon's take-2 on the same partially stacked sensor housed in a new body--apparently designed less than 1.5 years after they bought RED (Press X for doubt) for a measly 85 million (RED probably had massive debts that Nikon absorbed). It seems to me they did their best to squeeze enough RED tech for marketing purposes into a camera that was clearly just designed to be a Z6III with a new body, minus EVF, and with a huge giant screen. More like a Version 0.5 of "Z Cinema" than a V1.0, IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSMW Posted 38 minutes ago Share Posted 38 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Video Hummus said: The curse of being Panasonic LUMIX and not Sony Alpha Yup, but to be fair, Lumix has had a lot of ‘love’ recently from the shill brigade but a lot of them will now (and have already started) flipping over to the ZR. Soon though, Sony will be releasing the A7V and they will then flop back in that direction and will have gone full circle. Beyond that, perhaps DJI will have popped out their rumored MILC and that will become The Next Big Thing? It’s all inevitable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now