Panasonic LUMIX V1

[DBounce 1,270]

This new thread is here because the other thread is apparently wrong. The new camera is NOT FULL FRAME... it’s APS-C. 

Now things are getting interesting.

Specs:

Name: Panasonic Lumix V1

24MP APS-C sensor

L-mount

Internal: 6K 10bit 30p, 4K 10bit 60p, 2K 10bit 60p, 2K 8bit 120p

External via SDI: 6K 12bit 60p, 4K 12bit 120p, 2K 12bit 240p

14bit RAW Photos

12fps shutter

All-I & LongGOP compression

Prores & Prores RAW compression

[Oliver Daniel 1,286]

8 minutes ago, DBounce said:

This new thread is here because the other thread is apparently wrong. The new camera is NOT FULL FRAME... it’s APS-C. 

Now things are getting interesting.

Specs:

Name: Panasonic Lumix V1

24MP APS-C sensor

L-mount

Internal: 6K 10bit 30p, 4K 10bit 60p, 2K 10bit 60p, 2K 8bit 120p

External via SDI: 6K 12bit 60p, 4K 12bit 120p, 2K 12bit 240p

14bit RAW Photos

12fps shutter

All-I & LongGOP compression

Prores & Prores RAW compression

This has to be fake. I’d be very surprised if it isn’t. 

[DBounce 1,270]

6 minutes ago, Oliver Daniel said:

This has to be fake. I’d be very surprised if it isn’t. 

Well think about it... why kill their already under selling full frame bodies by adding yet a third? Meanwhile, Fuji has been having a runaway success with their X-T3 sales.

[thebrothersthre3 859]

It kind of makes sense to me.

If it had a low MP sensor I'd be more interested. Right now it just is too much like an XT3. The external recording options are very nice though. 

Still it'll have really good IBIS and and a classic tough built Panasonic body. 

[AlexTrinder96 167]

 

 

[kye 2,123]

Shame, I could have done with 4k120 in 12-bit!

[DBounce 1,270]

Just now, kye said:

Shame, I could have done with 4k120 in 12-bit!

It's all speculation at this point. If full frame, I think it harms the sales of the S1/R cameras. And sales are already dismal. If APS-C and priced right, it could be a breath of fresh air. Frankly Idk which it will be. Honestly, I don't think Panasonic should stick with this big and heavy mirrorless format. I think they should adopt a XC15 type format for this camera. So I guess I hope both are incorrect. 

[UncleBobsPhotography 78]

The * comments in the bottom left of the picture is written in broken English, which makes me think it's fake

[Amazeballs 92]

It doesnt make any sense for Pany to go APC-S L-Mount when they already have FF and M43 and zero APC-S lenses. It makes sense to make a S35 sensor with a M43 mount though. 

[DBounce 1,270]

3 minutes ago, Amazeballs said:

It doesnt make any sense for Pany to go APC-S L-Mount when they already have FF and M43 and zero APC-S lenses. It makes sense to make a S35 sensor with a M43 mount though. 

That would have some potential, if the lenses have the coverage.

[Chrad 197]

Chances of Panasonic putting SDI on a DSLR style body are maybe a smidge above zero.

[hoodlum 80]

This image was posted a week ago in the comments at 43rumors by the person who created it.  It was just based on his wish list and actually included his signature at the bottom right but that was removed by that rumor site.  It is a total fake.

https://www.43rumors.com/ft5-panasonic-will-have-a-cine-lumix-announcement-on-may-31/

 

[DBounce 1,270]

6 minutes ago, hoodlum said:

This image was posted a week ago in the comments at 43rumors by the person who created it.  It was just based on his wish list and actually included his signature at the bottom right but that was removed by that rumor site.  It is a total fake.

https://www.43rumors.com/ft5-panasonic-will-have-a-cine-lumix-announcement-on-may-31/

 

Good catch, but this camera makes more sense imo... especially if it was M43. Remember, atm everything is still rumors, including full frame. I really hope the body is different.

[Andrew Reid 8,001]

Fake news.

Thread closed.