kye Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 I hear lots of love on this forum for cameras like the 1DC, the C100, etc. The context is that they're more than just the stats, that it's something potentially involving the movement, or the sharpness (or lack thereof), or maybe the colours.. I'm sure there's other things too. Three questions: 1) Which cameras have it? 2) For each camera that has it, what is it about that camera that gives it that mojo? Movement? Colours? Highlight rolloff? .....what? 3) How much of this can be done in post? Surely if you record 13-stops DR high-bitrate in 10-bit there's enough data to get the colours, maybe the highlight rolloff? Maybe sharpness can be tailored? jonpais and anonim 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonpais Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 It’s a myth. But according to your post, only Canon has the secret. Very revealing, ES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted March 2, 2018 Super Members Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 10:13 AM, kye said: 1) Which cameras have it? 2) For each camera that has it, what is it about that camera that gives it that mojo? Movement? Colours? Highlight rolloff? .....what? 3) How much of this can be done in post? Surely if you record 13-stops DR high-bitrate in 10-bit there's enough data to get the colours, maybe the highlight rolloff? Maybe sharpness can be tailored? Expand 1) Several. And its not so much the camera imo as the camera and lens combination. 2) Sensor and lens combination. So it includes sharpness/lack of sharpness, colours, rolloff, DR, sensor texture, curve, rendition, etc and so forth. 3) Very little and it requires to much work imo. Better to get it right in camera. (All of the above is imo and according to my experience.) Inazuma 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonpais Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 As canned moderator, agreed. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted March 2, 2018 Author Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 10:31 AM, jonpais said: It’s a myth. But according to your post, only Canon has the secret. Very revealing, ES. Expand They're just the ones I've heard mentioned - I think I've heard Digital Bolex mentioned in this sense as well. What does ES mean? On 3/2/2018 at 10:40 AM, Mattias Burling said: 1) Several. And its not so much the camera imo as the camera and lens combination. 2) Sensor and lens combination. So it includes sharpness/lack of sharpness, colours, rolloff, DR, sensor texture, curve, rendition, etc and so forth. Expand In theory if you capture enough DR and bit depth, you should be able to re-create some of these in post - colours, rolloff, curve, and maybe rendition (I'm not 100% sure what you mean by "rendition"). On 3/2/2018 at 10:40 AM, Mattias Burling said: 3) Very little and it requires to much work imo. Better to get it right in camera. Expand I agree it would be better to get it right in-camera, assuming you can afford it that is! For those of us with modest means, I'm curious to have a little more understanding. Not only can understanding get us part of the way there with what we have, but it can also do that for our archive of footage that regardless of wealth cannot be shot on a different camera!! I know that many on these forums don't dip into their back-catalogue much, but for family videos its a real thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted March 2, 2018 Super Members Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 10:45 AM, kye said: What does ES mean? Expand Just a guess but is it possible that you may have been a member of The Bangles in a former life? jonpais 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted March 2, 2018 Super Members Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 10:45 AM, kye said: I agree it would be better to get it right in-camera, assuming you can afford it that is! Expand The cameras with the most mojo Ive had have all been low cost and much cheaper relative to the new releases. So it absolutley isnt a correlation between mojo and price imo. kye and jonpais 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonim Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 10:31 AM, jonpais said: Very revealing, ES. Expand What for stands abbreviation ES in English - Enough said? (imported but often used so) En suite? Erase Screen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 1:07 PM, anonim said: What for stands abbreviation ES in English - Enough said? (imported but often used so) En suite? Erase Screen? Expand Ebrahim Sadaawi. mkabi, Mattias Burling, Jimbo and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonim Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 10:59 AM, BTM_Pix said: Just a guess but is it possible that you may have been a member of The Bangles in a former life? Expand I don't understand ES also. Is it so hard to answer politely if someone ask you something? I don't know also who The Bangles are, but I believe it is part of base education which some of us here lack, when @jonpais find it so funny to put a lovely smile... But it didn't help @Kye who ask - except he now know that you didn't want to answer him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Maze Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 Of course mojo is subjective. But to me the 1DC, Fuji JPEGs, and the digital Bolex are my favs. kye 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted March 2, 2018 Super Members Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 1:07 PM, anonim said: What for stands abbreviation ES in English - Enough said? (imported but often used so) En suite? Erase Screen? Expand I think the ES that @jonpais is using is "Errata Sendorum", which is an old Latin phrase used in English contract law in reference to failing to deliver an SLR Magic Rangefinder Grimor, Parker, Mattias Burling and 2 others 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonpais Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted March 2, 2018 Super Members Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 1:17 PM, anonim said: I don't understand ES also. Is it so hard to answer politely if someone ask you something? I don't know also who The Bangles are, but I believe it is part of base education which some of us here lack, when @jonpais find it so funny to put a lovely smile... But it didn't help @Kye who ask - except he now know that you didn't want to answer him. Expand He didn't ask ME directly to be fair, I was just offering it as a possible meaning to what Jon meant. Which it was up to Jon to confirm really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonim Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 1:17 PM, BTM_Pix said: I think the ES that @jonpais is using is "Errata Sendorum", which is an old Latin phrase used in English contract law in reference to failing to deliver an SLR Magic Rangefinder Expand Than you can tell @Kye immediately how briliantly an logical you understood sentence with ES - and simply succeed to be a human at your best level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonpais Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 it actually refers to ‘amour Canon’ more than the other shenanigans. If the OP wants an open and frank discussion about mojo, why load the topic with references to his fav label? I could just as easily have written ‘I hear lots of love in this forum for cameras like the GH5, the NX1, the BMPCC, the Digital Bolex...’ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 On the multiple forums for making moving pictures I've frequented over the past decade, There are three cameras that are talked about in terms of "mojo" than any other. 1. Sony F35. 2. Digital Bolex. 3. Canon 1DC. kye and Geoff CB 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonim Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 1:29 PM, jonpais said: it actually refers to ‘amour Canon’ more than the other shenanigans. If the OP wants an open and frank discussion about mojo, why load the topic with references to his fav label? I could just as easily have written ‘I hear lots of love in this forum for cameras like the GH5, the NX1, the BMPCC, the Digital Bolex...’ Expand First, after your explanation, I'll try again - what does it mean abbreviation ES in English if you don't agree that @BTM_Pix's brilliant answer guessed right? Second, I also read ("heard") that Canon has that mojo, in very high frequency ratio respective to other cameras, at least at EOSHD. Maybe it is wrong conclusion, but it looks to me so. Third, this thread drove my attention because I wish more to learn about what exactly people see when claim that something has mojo - because mojo in canon cameras in principal refers to "cinematic" character. I like also greatly Canon look and want to more understand why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted March 2, 2018 Super Members Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 1:25 PM, anonim said: Than you can tell @Kye immediately how briliantly an logical you understood sentence with ES - and simply succeed to be a human at your best level Expand The only thing I'll be doing "immediately" and with "brilliant logic" is completely disregarding this and any other orders you might feel like giving me altogether. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 On 3/2/2018 at 1:43 PM, anonim said: Second, I also read ("heard") that Canon has that mojo, in very high frequency ratio respective to other cameras, at least at EOSHD. Expand No. good straight out of camera color yes. but not mojo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now