Jump to content
Andrew Reid

Panasonic GH5 - all is revealed!

Recommended Posts

EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

Both are closer than one would think, but there are so many good LuTs out there now, just about anything is possible. But I would think Raw on the Ursa would be, well, better.

But to the average person I doubt they would see it, or even care about it.  :frown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am having major issues with V-Log on the GH5. I see significant ghosting and some sort of banding when I pan left and right. It only happens in V-Log, regardless of frame rate, aperture, or shutter speed. I am familiar with S-Log so maybe I am missing something obvious with V-Log?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, zmarty said:

I am having major issues with V-Log on the GH5. I see significant ghosting and some sort of banding when I pan left and right. It only happens in V-Log, regardless of frame rate, aperture, or shutter speed. I am familiar with S-Log so maybe I am missing something obvious with V-Log?

Post frame grabs.

Does it happen at all ISOs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, hyalinejim said:

Post frame grabs.

Does it happen at all ISOs?

I can do even better than that, I will post test videos:

Natural: http://files.hdrcolorgrading.com/2017-04-GH5-Tests/natural.MP4

V-Log: http://files.hdrcolorgrading.com/2017-04-GH5-Tests/vlog.MP4

These are UHD 60fps, straight from the camera and untouched. The videos were taken seconds from one another. The only difference between them is the picture profile.

The natural profile has issues as well, but the V-Log problems are quite severe. I hope it's something really simple that I am missing.

I don't know the value of the ISO, I will try more detailed experiments tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, hyalinejim said:

 Have you tried turning Noise Reduction all the way down?

Yes. I tried with 0 which is the default and with -5, which is the minimum. No major difference. Will try more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hanriverprod said:

Some off the cuff comparisons between um4.6 and gh5.

Would like to see skin off different types of interior lights, wide and cu, and also mixed lights.

Unfortunatelly he didnt said which codec he used with UM46K. One of the strongest features of UM46K is compressed 4.6K raw, not prores so i would like to see how the cameras best codecs compares: 4:1 4.6K raw 60fps vs 10 bit vlogL h.264 30fps (and vs 8bit 60fps) - i would like to see shadow/highlight recovery abilities with the best codecs of both cameras (there is really lots of recoverable information in UM46K highlights).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, kgv5 said:

Unfortunatelly he didnt said which codec he used with UM46K. One of the strongest features of UM46K is compressed 4.6K raw, not prores so i would like to see how the cameras best codecs compares: 4:1 4.6K raw 60fps vs 10 bit vlogL h.264 30fps (and vs 8bit 60fps) - i would like to see shadow/highlight recovery abilities with the best codecs of both cameras (there is really lots of recoverable information in UM46K highlights).

 

ok, he now answered, that  it was prores HQ UHD422 on UM46K. 

So we can see, that GH5 is holding up nicely with dynamic range until you unleash RAW in UM46K and play with shadow/highlight sliders in resolve. Than you can gain additional DR steps where GH5 codec is struggling and cannot really keep up. Raw settings in resolve with highlight/shadow, midtones etc. are much better than just using curves on compressed codec, gives much more clarity according to my tests. It is nice to see that 10bit GH5 codec looks the same like UM 10bit prores HQ422. I wonder what about UM 444 12bit proress though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, zmarty said:

I can do even better than that, I will post test videos:

Natural: http://files.hdrcolorgrading.com/2017-04-GH5-Tests/natural.MP4

V-Log: http://files.hdrcolorgrading.com/2017-04-GH5-Tests/vlog.MP4

These are UHD 60fps, straight from the camera and untouched. The videos were taken seconds from one another. The only difference between them is the picture profile.

The natural profile has issues as well, but the V-Log problems are quite severe. I hope it's something really simple that I am missing.

I don't know the value of the ISO, I will try more detailed experiments tomorrow.

I also tried outputting to an external monitor, both in 8 bit and 10 bit, at 24, 30 and 60 fps. The ghosting is still very visible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's any consolation, having been through this issue with the XC10, ghosting is a hell of a lot more noticeable in a still image than a moving image. But once you see it, it's hard to unsee it. I don't have a GH5 yet so I can't corroborate for you. But if you'd like others to test if their units are affected (and my guess is that it's universal) then you need to tell us what ISO you're seeing ghosting at.

To minimise it:

1. Keep ISO low where possible
2. Turn NR to minimum (theoretically this should decrease it)
3. Find the profile that has the least ghosting
4. Keep movement to a minimum
5. Try not to worry too much about it. 99% of the population won't be able to see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, hyalinejim said:

If it's any consolation, having been through this issue with the XC10, ghosting is a hell of a lot more noticeable in a still image than a moving image. But once you see it, it's hard to unsee it. I don't have a GH5 yet so I can't corroborate for you. But if you'd like others to test if their units are affected (and my guess is that it's universal) then you need to tell us what ISO you're seeing ghosting at.

To minimise it:

1. Keep ISO low where possible
2. Turn NR to minimum (theoretically this should decrease it)
3. Find the profile that has the least ghosting
4. Keep movement to a minimum
5. Try not to worry too much about it. 99% of the population won't be able to see it.

I will try that.

Normally I would agree with you that most people would not see it. It is present in all profiles and I can live with that. However, as you can probably see from my test videos above, the ghosting in V-Log is so extreme that none of my test videos have been usable. It is obvious to anybody watching the footage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, hyalinejim said:

OK, but at what ISO? I would expect to see very little to no ghosting at base ISO, and for it to increase as ISO increases.

 

I will check multiple ISO settings and will report back here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, zmarty said:

I will check multiple ISO settings and will report back here.

I checked all ISO values in the Natural and V-Log profiles (respectively), and I really don't like what I am seeing:

Natural: Ghosting is present at all ISO values, but it is less apparent at lower values. I would consider all ISO settings usable in this profile and I would not have much trouble delivering footage in this profile. But compared to my Sony A6300 the GH5 is much worse.

V-Log L: I set Noise Reduction and Sharpness to -5 (minimum values). Ghosting is present at all ISO values, but it is much more severe. More specifically, everything below and including ISO 800 is reasonable. ISO 1600 is OK but ghosting is quite visible. Anything at 3200 or above has way too much ghosting and I would not shoot anything at this ISO or higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, zmarty said:

I can do even better than that, I will post test videos:

That is temporal noise reduction. The reason that it's more visible in v-log is apparently because the GH5 applies noise reduction as one of the last steps of the image. V-LOG = less contrasty so you will see more of those double lines (in temporal noise reduction there is a cut-off point but that depends on the contrast, as the noise reduction engine sees the double images easier on more contrasty images).

Not 100% sure but it seems that's what is happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...