Jump to content
Nikkor

Sony a6300 4k

Recommended Posts

Just shot a few tests with the A6300 in 4K.

Sony have completely changed their noise reduction and the way the codec handles noise...

Behold... A fine noise grain in video mode!!

56e1c02aef7f1_a6300noise6400.jpg.90a53a4

This is really nice to see.

Shot at ISO 6400 by the way.

One thing I have noticed with the copper sensors (X Pro 2, NX1, A6300) is that they really hold onto colour and dynamic range well at high ISOs.

More coming soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
5 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said:

Just shot a few tests with the A6300 in 4K.

Sony have completely changed their noise reduction and the way the codec handles noise...

Behold... A fine noise grain in video mode!!

56e1c02aef7f1_a6300noise6400.jpg.90a53a4

This is really nice to see.

Shot at ISO 6400 by the way.

One thing I have noticed with the copper sensors (X Pro 2, NX1, A6300) is that they really hold onto colour and dynamic range well at high ISOs.

More coming soon.

looks stuningly good for a 100mbit codec!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AF in stills mode with Canon lenses on Metabones adapter is mindblowingly fast in good light.

Can't seem to get them to track an object in video mode though.

The Sony lenses track but rather unreliably in low light.

So mixed bag with AF but I am loving the image so far.... seems better than expected... mainly due to NR and codec improvements? The rolling shutter is pretty severe though, like NX1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Andrew Reid said:

AF in stills mode with Canon lenses on Metabones adapter is mindblowingly fast in good light.

Can't seem to get them to track an object in video mode though.

The Sony lenses track but rather unreliably in low light.

So mixed bag with AF but I am loving the image so far.... seems better than expected... mainly due to NR and codec improvements? The rolling shutter is pretty severe though, like NX1.

Yes, have the same problem. Ultra fast in photomode, but not working in videomode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the Sony 16-105 F4 and it wasn't exactly working well with that either... recognises people, but then slips to the background occasionally if you're not in optimal lighting or the background is more detailed and brighter than the subject.

It doesn't seem as bullet proof as the 1D X Mark II's dual pixel AF.

I am sure it is just a case of learning to work within the limitations of it.... sometimes it's amazing and a BIG improvement on before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People are saying the 1080p 120fps looks soft.

Doesn't look to bad to me...

a6300-120fps.thumb.jpg.3bc46f6e4c0664ef9

Also colour in the Vivid profile is very "Fuji-like"

S-LOG may give you dynamic range, but if you want the most effortless out of camera colour just set it to Vivid.

In 120fps with centre-spot AF and enough light to feed the phase-detect pixels it rocks... locks on superbly to what is in the centre of the frame, no hunting.

Dim the light and contrast detect AF kicks in and it's still a bit poo.

Rolling shutter is the biggest issue I have had so far with the 4K 24p.

It's the most I've ever had. Locked down shots no issue but this definitely isn't a tool for violent handheld camera work.

However in the 1080p modes especially 120fps the rolling shutter issues almost disappear...

And 30fps is a BIT better...but crops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Jordan Drake said:

Hey Andrew,

I appreciate the response, and I'm glad you like the content Chris and I put out. We look forward your feedback on anything we produce, and I've gained a lot of useful information and insight from this blog and the message boards.

However, I feel that essentially calling out the entire review community for being in Sony's pockets is excessive. If you were in North America and wanted to test a production A6300 before launch, the only way to do it was to fly to Miami for the press event. I wish that it was an option to have the camera shipped to us in Calgary for testing at that time, as I have other productions and a family to focus on outside of my TCSTV work. But the A6300 is such an important camera that we agreed to spend a few very busy, not at all relaxing days testing the camera out. You have to remember that this is a time when a huge number of enthusiasts pre-order their camera before launch, so these pre-release videos can serve a very useful purpose.

Most of the other journalists and reviewers I spoke with felt similarly. I'm sure a few odd ones didn't use the time to properly test the camera and wrote puff pieces about the camera and G-Master lenses, but many of us spent 16-20 hour days trying to make sure we had accurate impressions. I'd hate to see all of these people lumped together as shills for Sony.

It's a huge compliment that you see us as an honest, respectable source, and we appreciate you embedding our video on the blog post. Chris appreciates your beard-envy.  We hope you keep watching!

Absolutely, we all owe you one for the early A6300 coverage and you guys went out of your way to deliver...

Yes very unfair of me to make it sound like I was lumping people together.

If I had judged everyone the same I would have had to include myself in that as I have been to Sony press events for cameras organised in Berlin. I went to one for the a7R II for instance. They served us free champagne. I drank it. Went home. Wrote that the full frame 4K image looked like a dog had done a crap. I think this is really important in the industry. The PR company hasn't been in touch since. Sony however... have. I think they prefer honest feedback above the relationship bridge building bullshit any-day.

Personally I think their influence is becoming pervasive and it is rare to see someone come back from one of these events and raise an issue with the camera in public.

When you and Chris came back from Miami though you did a balanced video on it and the information was extremely useful for everyone thinking of buying the camera or not.

In the end people can tell if we are being balanced and they can tell when a site like DPReview is going down the drain with advertorial.

Hopefully also a site which still refuses to carry advertising (like mine) still means something.

I'm not sure it does any more.

Anyway, from the bottom of my heart be sure that I did not mean to lump your superb efforts in with the real intended target of my barbed comments, which were aimed at a minority online and not the good guys like you. I mean that.

Also, it's great to see you on the forum, hope you stick around, despite my occasional rants :)

Cine 4 is looking superb on the A6300.

None of the colour issues of the Creative Styles or the vast majority of the other Picture Profiles (ITU 709 particularly horrid)

I've graded it lightly with Fujiflm Velvia in Film Convert's a7s profile for Cine4.

I am astounded by the image quality of this camera for $1000... Take a look at that detail close up in 100% view if you download the frame grab below... it is FLAWLESS. Whatever 6K to 4K scaling method they have on the new processor... it works.

I prefer this image to my FS5.

a6300-4k-cine4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said:

Absolutely, we all owe you one for the early A6300 coverage and you guys went out of your way to deliver...

Yes very unfair of me to make it sound like I was lumping people together.

If I had judged everyone the same I would have had to include myself in that as I have been to Sony press events for cameras organised in Berlin. I went to one for the a7R II for instance. They served us free champagne. I drank it. Went home. Wrote that the full frame 4K image looked like a dog had done a crap. I think this is really important in the industry. The PR company hasn't been in touch since. Sony however... have. I think they prefer honest feedback above the relationship bridge building bullshit any-day.

Personally I think their influence is becoming pervasive and it is rare to see someone come back from one of these events and raise an issue with the camera in public.

When you and Chris came back from Miami though you did a balanced video on it and the information was extremely useful for everyone thinking of buying the camera or not.

In the end people can tell if we are being balanced and they can tell when a site like DPReview is going down the drain with advertorial.

Hopefully also a site which still refuses to carry advertising (like mine) still means something.

I'm not sure it does any more.

Anyway, from the bottom of my heart be sure that I did not mean to lump your superb efforts in with the real intended target of my barbed comments, which were aimed at a minority online and not the good guys like you. I mean that.

Also, it's great to see you on the forum, hope you stick around, despite my occasional rants :)

Cine 4 is looking superb on the A6300.

None of the colour issues of the Creative Styles or the vast majority of the other Picture Profiles (ITU 709 particularly horrid)

I've graded it lightly with Fujiflm Velvia in Film Convert's a7s profile for Cine4.

I am astounded by the image quality of this camera for $1000... Take a look at that detail close up in 100% view if you download the frame grab below... it is FLAWLESS. Whatever 6K to 4K scaling method they have on the new processor... it works.

I prefer this image to my FS5.

a6300-4k-cine4.jpg

 

 

Worth the upgrade from the A6000 if the end result will be 1080? and stills.

Thanks for posting this early impressions.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hitfabryk -

Friendly forum etiquette tip... Please don't quote long posts unnecessarily, just reply straight under them, as all this quoting doubles up on itself and makes the page extremely long to scroll through.

Yes worth the upgrade from the A6000 definitely, unless you have a compelling reason to go for a different model entirely like the A7S II or NX1. Most people won't, I don't think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rolling shutter is a bit less in it but the idea of 30p and a crop doesn't really appeal to me artistically

I think this is a great camera for wide angle Super 35mm.

Telephoto not so much because of the rolling shutter. Handholding an 85mm or 135mm, forget it.

Sigma 20mm F1.4 on the Speed Booster, now we're talking! It's stunning with this and barely any hint of distortion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Andrew Reid said:

I am astounded by the image quality of this camera for $1000... Take a look at that detail close up in 100% view if you download the frame grab below... it is FLAWLESS. Whatever 6K to 4K scaling method they have on the new processor... it works.

I prefer this image to my FS5.

a6300-4k-cine4.jpg

Wow, this looks seriously impressive.  I wonder how the A6300 stacks up against the A7RII in S35 mode?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...