thebrothersthre3

yes

He could get an EOS R for cheaper though which would make more sense if he's matching cameras. 

I feel like an XT3 especially used would be a great bargain. If you don't need 4k a used A7S is even cheaper plus the low light performance is the best money can buy. 

yes

form factor and internal ND's 

yes

yes

form factor and internal ND's 

I'd not be surprised. I am pretty sure he did a test(maybe it was another youtuber but they had equal experience regardless) and he left all the NR and Sharpness settings on default between like 5 different cameras. Really put some at a disadvantage. 

I decided I am going to make an adapter for the URSA mini seeing as there isn't one available for the Mini (non pro version). It honestly should be really simple. Just going to remove an EF mount off a cheap adapter and attach it to a piece of sheet metal cut to size. Than I'll just have to shim it until its the perfect distance from the sensor. 
I am a bit jealous. I wish I was able to pick that one up for $500 I talked about earlier. I might hold out and get a Z-cam S6 down the road. They have an Electronic Variable ND adapter for it and I've been really impressed with the IQ on those cameras. 

 
 
I am jealous 🤣

While not 4k, I would recommend a C100 for low light. The 1080p will be better (in quality and low light) than the EOS R 1080p and they are easy to match. You might even get away with mixing C100 1080p and EOS R 4k without anyone noticing. You can find these C100 like dirt cheap. Found myself one for 800€ with atomos ninja 2 and other stuff included.

I am planning on modifying my Minolta 35mm 1.8 to EF. 
I really love the image and it will be nice to start using it more frequently. 

I decided I am going to make an adapter for the URSA mini seeing as there isn't one available for the Mini (non pro version). It honestly should be really simple. Just going to remove an EF mount off a cheap adapter and attach it to a piece of sheet metal cut to size. Than I'll just have to shim it until its the perfect distance from the sensor. 
I am a bit jealous. I wish I was able to pick that one up for $500 I talked about earlier. I might hold out and get a Z-cam S6 down the road. They have an Electronic Variable ND adapter for it and I've been really impressed with the IQ on those cameras. 

 
 
I am jealous 🤣

Sigma fp with CinemaDNG is excellent for low light, especially if you denoise with Neat Video Pro.

Aside everything Tom has said, as far as I've seen from X-T4, Fuji's are pretty decent...

GH5S
A7S
A7SII
A73
BM Pocket 4k
BM Pocket 6k

The Fuji XT3, XT-30, and XT2 are not bad at 6400 iso. The Sony A6400/A6300/A6100 etc.. also are pretty respectable. Not sure what your noise tolerances are. I'd not use any of panasonics M43 cameras at 6400 iso besides the GH5S. 

I’m currently trying to construct a mount for it. There is more than enough room for one once you remove the PL mount. Really odd they didn’t make it interchangeable. I’d like to get the pro version but it’s a good deal more that I don’t have lol. I also like the big 5 inch screen on mine. We'll see. 

Apparently the Ursa Mini 4.6k mount isn't interchangeable, only the mini pro 🤦‍♀️

Looks like I'll be returning it 

There isn't really a file size difference between 1080p and 4k if you are shooting at 100mbps. 

I agree though, unless you are cropping you can't tell a difference, until maybe you blow it up on a big 4k screen. 

The pocket 4k is impressive for 1k, crazy

I think its just the reality for most creative jobs. Its either you know the right people or you are lucky or you are good at business or at least marketing yourself. 

I think its just the reality for most creative jobs. Its either you know the right people or you are lucky or you are good at business or at least marketing yourself. 

I got a big laugh out of that one 

For native lenses probably the older primes the 35mm 1.4, 23mm 1.4, 16mm 1.4 and the 56mm 1.2, for the longer focus throw. The 16-55 2.8 is probably nice too for that. 

The newer F2 lenses have faster Auto Focus if you'll be using AF you might want to go with those. The auto focus on the older lenses is also kind of jumpy or steppy/mechanical looking sometimes. 
Going into the last settings(marked with a wrench) and switching focus from nonlinear to linear helps a lot to with manual focusing. 

If you want to go all out see if you can get ahold of the 18-55 2.8 cine lens. 

A C100 mk3 that’s essentially a C200 without RAW and with 10 bit out would be killer. 

If he got what he needed at the show then any advantage the A73 has wasn't needed.