newfoundmass
-
Posts
2,191 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by newfoundmass
-
-
1 hour ago, kye said:
DON'T COMPARE LENSES WITH DIFFERENT MAXIMUM APERTURES ON THEIR "WIDE OPEN" RESOLUTION!!!! You wouldn't compare a 50mm F0.95 at F0.95 with a 50mm F3.5 at F3.5 would you? The f3.5 lens would kill the faster one, but that's just ridiculous.
I phrased what I was trying to say incorrectly. What I meant to say is that the Leica is still pretty sharp wide open, while the Voigtlander needs to be stopped down because the f0.95 isn't very useful and is more of a gimmick. The Leica wide open at f1.4 is sharper than the Voigtlander is at f1.4.
-
The Leica is sharper wide open while the Voigtlander is pretty useless at f/0.95 because of how soft it is.
Still the Voigtlander will match your other lens so I'd say probably go that route.
-
I think it's a couple of things, possibly a combination of them:
A lot of YouTubers come from money. Some come from wealthy families, others had/have good paying jobs that allow them to indulge in an expensive hobby, etc. Even if they have gotten to the point where they're self sustainable off of YouTube revenue and freelance work, it's likely they started from an advantageous position to begin with. Living in NYC or Los Angeles isn't cheap, you need a lot of money just to get set up there.
I also think the ease in which you can get credit to buy stuff probably has a lot to do with it. Literally every time I order something off of Amazon, eBay, B & H, etc. I get credit offers. Wouldn't shock me to find out a lot of YouTubers are going into debt.
Then there's the freebies/sponsored content. A lot of them have built up relationships with B & H so they'll get loaners, which I don't really object to and prefer over them getting freebies. But a lot of them just get stuff sent to them. I remember Tom Antos did a video where he unboxed like 30+ things he'd been sent and had been sitting on that he never bothered to review. No clue what he did with all of it, probably sold it? But it really opened my eyes to how freely all this equipment gets sent out and is viewed by the companies as the cost of doing business. Then of course you've got your Canon, Sony, etc. sending people review copies, flying people out, etc.
Potato Jet I think probably comes from a well to do family, because even though I know he's a working professional it's very hard for me to believe that he can afford everything he has while living in Los Angeles, even with a profitable YouTube career and his freelance work. His house alone has to cost half a million or more! But in general I feel like he's honest, and he gives away most of the stuff he reviews.
Once a YouTuber starts to feel like they're compromised I start to gravitate away from them and their content. It's why I enjoy smaller channels (see my thread dedicated to them ?) because they're not big enough to be getting stuff from companies and instead use/review things they've spent their money on. In general they're a lot less biased.
14 minutes ago, MurtlandPhoto said:Potato Jet has access to all that gear through a variety of ways. He is an active video producer so he has access to rentals and other equipment used for that. He has many filmmaker friends that loan him stuff. He has many sponsors that send him items for review. And he is has a healthy case of G.A.S as well that leads to many of his own purchases.
If you watch enough of his videos, he eventually tells you how/why he has basically every piece of kit. Sometimes he'll reference a RED he rented or borrowed for a video from months prior, for example.
TBH Potato Jet is my favorite Youtuber right now. He feels very genuine and I legitimately like watching his stuff.
Yeah that's another thing he has to his benefit by living in LA. The availability of equipment, whether it's from rentals or friends, is on a completely different level.
He seems like a very kind person so I don't wanna come off as too critical. There aren't a lot of people that'll go out and buy equipment for their friend that's starting a YouTube channel, and then give that same friend his bike as a gift.
-
Does it shoot raw?
-
4 hours ago, Geoff CB said:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/video/news/capture-pro-style-4k-in-compact-form-with-panasonics-new-hc-x2000-hc-x1500-ag-cx10?BI=4906&fbclid=IwAR2-uoLi-MY4FvPjomqGdgho9KmwdtKRi-LH-2Q9TkYWfCukF7OG1n_t0VU
Panasonic has three new camcorders, interesting specs and price for what they offer.Agreed. It's just hard to go back to a camcorder
-
-
Yeah I know the European one has the limit. I'm in the US though.
-
This might have been covered in one of the posts in this thread but...
I'm getting conflicting info on whether the Gx85 has unlimited recording or not. I'm in need of a C cam and I figured it'd fit in nicely with my GH5 and G85, especially given the price, but if it has the recording limit its not good for my work.
I know the GX80 has the limit, and I know that the B & H specs say it has the 30 minute limit, but some videos and forum posts I've read say it doesn't.
????
-
-
4 hours ago, Mako Sports said:
I said it when the s1/s1r first came out. The overpriced lenses with their Leica tax (even the Pansonic ones) will keep the L mount system from being a popular choice.
I think as Sigma and Panasonic release more lenses it'll pick up, but until then it'll go through the same thing Sony went through a few years ago when they didn't have the lens lineup they have now. Problem is, is it too late in general to play catch up if you're Panasonic? I think for video shooters no. I think the S1 has done pretty good for them, and I think the S1H will do good for that audience. For photographers though? I think it's a real uphill battle to gain much of a market share there.
-
1 minute ago, wolf33d said:
The S1R is half the price for a reason: nobody buys that crap.
It's not crap, I just don't think there's much of a market for it. It's not ideal for video, and there are more popular options for photographers who need that many megapixels.
-
Not sure I'd get the S1R if your primary use will be video.
-
This is absolutely a scam of some sort.
Most Meike reviews I've seen have been very positive but they've also been from people that got free lenses to review, so your mileage may vary on how unbiased those reviews are. I trust some more than others.
-
18 minutes ago, Mako Sports said:
No, come to the darkside. ?
Smdh! ?
3 hours ago, SRV1981 said:Is it dumb to drop my XT2 and jump to the a7iii if this is a few months away?
Dumb? No. Unnecessary? Probably. If you're seriously considering buying this I'd wait to see when it will be released and what the specs actually are. You also might find used prices on A7iii cameras dropping on the used market once it's announced.
-
-
3 hours ago, nathlas said:
I would prefer the olympus Zuiko 40-150 f2,8 PRO hands down
Much better lens
Also over twice as much on the used market! I'm getting the 35-100 for a good deal.
-
It's great news if they've decided to bulk it up to help with overheating / allowing better performance.
-
Question: I've got someone offering me a good deal on the Panasonic 35-100 f2.8 mk I. Is anyone using it for video and is there a jittering problem like I've heard the mk II has?
-
-
7 hours ago, EphraimP said:
Moral of the story? I'd like to be a big boy someday and have lights big enough to shine through a window to light my scenes someday... Maybe.
You can buy a cheap fresnel which might help! It'll intensify the 60W quite a bit. I'm eyeing one myself.
7 hours ago, EphraimP said:Affordable he says. Good one ?
In the grand scheme of things it actually is pretty affordable! But only if you're doing this full time on a much bigger scale! Those are the kind of lights that'll last for a long, long time. Whereas if the Godox only lasts me 5 years (I don't think it will, it's really well built) I'll be really annoyed but at the end of the day I only spent $100 on it (got 3 for $100 each!) so I can't complain too much, that one you know it'll go you for years and years.
Lighting is usually a smart long term investment. An example: My buddy Matt works in NYC doing grip and lighting for TV networks in the area. He's plugged into that scene, and he regularly sees lights that are being given away as studios/networks/etc. upgrade their lighting set up. You're probably thinking "giving away? That doesn't sound like a smart investment!" The thing is these are 20 or 30 year old lights! And they still work! They've gotten their monies worth 100x over on the original investment. People have pieced together light kits that would've cost over $100k 25 years ago, for free, because there's such an abundance of these things all over the place!
-
I'm forecasted to get between 1 and 2 feet of snow while he's talking about filming on the beach! Smdh
-
5 hours ago, thebrothersthre3 said:
Yeah really odd too considering the XT3 has a similar sensor yet way better 1080p. Plus they haven't improved it yet have released like 4 different A6 cameras with the same sensor ?
I'm guessing it wasn't a sensor issue, but a processing one.
-
5 hours ago, barefoot_dp said:
I'm lucky enough that most of my shoots are happening either at the beach
I hate you. ?
Thanks all! I'm looking at these right now to put in my Adidas. If that doesn't work I'm gonna try out a pair of New Balance!
Samurai Insoles Instant Relief Orthotics for Flat Feet - Plantar Fasciitis Pain Relief Guaranteed, Arch Support Shoe Insert Insoles for Foot and Heel Pain M13 https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B00OJCPU5K/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_jLP4Db3CQGMPT
Keep any tips coming! Thanks for all the help so far!
-
8 minutes ago, thebrothersthre3 said:
Yeah the Godox looks nice but the 60ws aren't quite enough power for me. They do make their own 200w version but there are some complaints of fan noise. I heard some people have modified these types of lights with quieter fans.
Yeah, Curtis Judd reviewed the Godox 200w recently and the fan noise was a complaint he had.
It seems that replacing the fans has caused increased flickering in a lot of these lights.
People complained about the 60w's fan noise but unless your mic is like right on top of it I can't see (or hear!) how it's a problem. I love the light though, it was a lot brighter than I was expecting.
How is this funded? Mega rich YouTubers
In: Cameras
Posted
I think mega rich was a figure of speech on Andrew's part. But still a lot of YouTubers obviously come from some wealth, especially those that are millenials that are set up in major cities straight out of high school / college. It costs a lot to get set up in Los Angeles or New York; if it didn't a lot of us would do it!
It's not an attack on them, but that they're the top names on YouTube when it comes to this stuff, it kinda overshadows the rest of those channels trying to put out helpful / good content. Like I genuinely feel bad when I stumble across a channel of someone that is putting out good content and only gets a couple dozen hits. When YouTube never bothers to widely promote them a lot get discouraged and stop uploading or they'll start copying what others are doing because it's apparently what YouTube wants out of creators. Then all the sudden I'm watching people that used to put informative stuff out now riding boosted boards, drinking coffee and doing things I don't care about. ?