mercer Posted Saturday at 12:55 PM Share Posted Saturday at 12:55 PM I'm at a point where I ALMOST see no point in shooting log profiles. There are a few good ones, but most require more grading after a utility LUT is applied and/or creates scenarios where everybody's footage looks pretty much exactly the same. So if you're just slapping on a LUT and calling it a day, for 9 out of 10 shots, you could just use a standard rec709 picture profile and get similar results. With the advent of 10bit video, in recent years, most standard picture profiles look even better than they ever have with thicker color and near perfect skintones. Sure there are instances when you may need the extra stop or two of dynamic range a Log profile offers, or a specific LUT gets you a relatively quick look by shooting Log, but again... 9 out of 10 times, a slightly tweaked Rec709 picture profile will end up looking better and get you there so much easier without worrying about CSTs and color pipelines... especially since damn near ever Log profile is just trying to emulate Arri LogC which in turn was designed to emulate film. Speaking of, I have the Arri LogC3 software key on my GH6 and it's pretty good... better than vLog but it's still noisy as hell with ugly chroma noise in the midtones and shadows so I recently went back to CineLikeD and V and I am back to making a couple contrast and saturation adjustments and being happy with it. I'm sure there is a slight hit in DR, but nothing so drastic that I'm surprised or wish I shot in Log instead. So Log is cool, I'm glad it's available, but it's fairly unnecessary in most situations and can cause a bigger headache. kye, John Matthews, Emanuel and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted Saturday at 01:08 PM Share Posted Saturday at 01:08 PM Love your insights, you should post more :- ) mercer and sanveer 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted Saturday at 07:55 PM Share Posted Saturday at 07:55 PM Definitely agree.. especially considering that if you really want to push the image around, you can convert it to LOG and make changes and then convert it back again. mercer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSMW Posted yesterday at 06:19 AM Share Posted yesterday at 06:19 AM I also get where you are coming from and that is why I bake the LUT into my footage. I set up all my cameras with 3 basic profiles based on ISO and WB for outdoor, indoor and low-lowlight scenarios. I say LUT, but there are actually 2x LUTS stacked; the conversion LUT and then my own custom ‘Look LUT’ which can be dialled in anywhere between 10-100%. It gets the look I want SOOC and it’s as unique to me as these things can be, is easy in the workflow and allows me to concentrate more on the interesting side of editing a film rather than the boring to me, more logistical grading. Only really works if no one else has a say in the end result and I’m fortunate that I’m my work, the grade is 100% my call. newfoundmass, kye and mercer 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzynormal Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago On 10/10/2026 at 5:55 AM, mercer said: I have the Arri LogC3 software key on my GH6 and it's pretty good... there is a slight hit in DR I just bought a used G9 without the LOGkey. That little bit of extra LOG DR I'm used to on my GH5 is leaving me wanting to go buy the key for the G9. It's not much increase in DR, you're right about that, but I do miss not having that little bit of extra juice to squeeze ... and, ironically, I do a lot of Standard profile 8-bit. So I ain't exactly super discriminating about my footage. mercer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted 30 minutes ago Author Share Posted 30 minutes ago 25 minutes ago, fuzzynormal said: I just bought a used G9 without the LOGkey. That little bit of extra LOG DR I'm used to on my GH5 is leaving me wanting to go buy the key for the G9. It's not much increase in DR, you're right about that, but I do miss not having that little bit of extra juice to squeeze ... and, ironically, I do a lot of Standard profile 8-bit. So I ain't exactly super discriminating about my footage. The GH6 is odd because they introduced the Dynamic Range Boost setting that supposedly does a dual iso meld like the Alexa does but it stretches the already stretched image so much that it introduces horrific chroma noise in the shadows and the low mids. So it's basically unusable without post noise reduction... well to be fair, the in camera noise reduction might fix it but I always dial it down. They fixed the function in the GH7 supposedly. But for an open box GH6 for $900, I can't complain. That said, I do think there's a hair more DR with the Arri Log than vLog and probably +1-2 stops compared to CineLikeD or my new favorite Flat profile. I must say the ProResHQ in every resolution is such a great codec. The files are thick and juicy. If you're ever looking for an upgrade without paying GH7 prices, the GH6 is a weird, yet fun camera. The screen mechanism is a dream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now